Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review

IF 3.1 Q1 NURSING
Lara Daniela Matos Cunha , Filipa Ventura , Márcia Pestana-Santos , Mauro Mota , Lurdes Lomba , Margarida Reis Santos
{"title":"Decision support strategies for bedside nursing clinical reasoning: A scoping review","authors":"Lara Daniela Matos Cunha ,&nbsp;Filipa Ventura ,&nbsp;Márcia Pestana-Santos ,&nbsp;Mauro Mota ,&nbsp;Lurdes Lomba ,&nbsp;Margarida Reis Santos","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Proficiency in clinical reasoning is crucial for achieving positive patient outcomes in healthcare. Nurses should take an active role in fostering their clinical reasoning skills. Bedside support strategies aim to offer practical, invaluable, and easily applicable resources for restructuring cognitive processes in situations of complex clinical demands.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This review aimed to map evidence on bedside decision strategies applied by nurses to support clinical reasoning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations for scoping reviews.</div></div><div><h3>Information</h3><div>Sources Studies were retrieved from Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, RCAAP (Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), and Google Scholar. Studies published in Portuguese, English, Spanish, or Swedish, without imposing geographical or cultural restrictions were considered. Qualitative and quantitative studies on bedside decision strategies that support nursing clinical reasoning were included, while studies exclusively focused on education, case-specific content, or Artificial Intelligence applications were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1889 results, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in countries such as China, New Zealand, Norway, Brazil, Indonesia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia, involving nurses, patients, and healthcare teams, with study designs ranging from qualitative research and cohort studies to quasi-experimental and theoretical analyses.These studies identified two key strategies: normative (following guidelines) and reflective (based on critical self-reflection).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Reflective strategies are widely used at the bedside, emphasizing the importance of adaptability in uncertain clinical environments. Despite Artificial Intelligence’s role in clinical decision-making, fostering critical thinking and decision-making skills in nurses remains essential.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>OSF <span><span>https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H96VQ</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Tweetable abstract</h3><div>A scoping review identified normative and reflective bedside strategies used by nurses to support clinical reasoning, highlighting the value of adaptability and critical thinking in complex care settings. #ClinicalReasoning #Nursing #PatientCare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34476,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X25000980","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Proficiency in clinical reasoning is crucial for achieving positive patient outcomes in healthcare. Nurses should take an active role in fostering their clinical reasoning skills. Bedside support strategies aim to offer practical, invaluable, and easily applicable resources for restructuring cognitive processes in situations of complex clinical demands.

Objective

This review aimed to map evidence on bedside decision strategies applied by nurses to support clinical reasoning.

Methods

The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute recommendations for scoping reviews.

Information

Sources Studies were retrieved from Medline (PubMed), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, RCAAP (Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal), and Google Scholar. Studies published in Portuguese, English, Spanish, or Swedish, without imposing geographical or cultural restrictions were considered. Qualitative and quantitative studies on bedside decision strategies that support nursing clinical reasoning were included, while studies exclusively focused on education, case-specific content, or Artificial Intelligence applications were excluded.

Results

Out of 1889 results, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies were conducted in countries such as China, New Zealand, Norway, Brazil, Indonesia, Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia, involving nurses, patients, and healthcare teams, with study designs ranging from qualitative research and cohort studies to quasi-experimental and theoretical analyses.These studies identified two key strategies: normative (following guidelines) and reflective (based on critical self-reflection).

Conclusions

Reflective strategies are widely used at the bedside, emphasizing the importance of adaptability in uncertain clinical environments. Despite Artificial Intelligence’s role in clinical decision-making, fostering critical thinking and decision-making skills in nurses remains essential.

Registration

OSF https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H96VQ.

Tweetable abstract

A scoping review identified normative and reflective bedside strategies used by nurses to support clinical reasoning, highlighting the value of adaptability and critical thinking in complex care settings. #ClinicalReasoning #Nursing #PatientCare.
床边护理临床推理的决策支持策略:范围综述
熟练掌握临床推理对于在医疗保健中获得积极的患者结果至关重要。护士应积极培养临床推理能力。床边支持策略旨在为在复杂临床需求的情况下重构认知过程提供实用的、无价的和易于应用的资源。目的探讨护士床边决策策略对临床推理的支持作用。方法本综述遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所对范围评估的建议。研究检索自Medline (PubMed)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Web of Science Core Collection、Scopus、Cochrane CENTRAL、RCAAP (Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal)和谷歌Scholar。以葡萄牙语、英语、西班牙语或瑞典语发表的研究,不受地理或文化限制。包括支持护理临床推理的床边决策策略的定性和定量研究,而专门关注教育、特定病例内容或人工智能应用的研究被排除在外。结果在1889项研究中,有14项研究符合纳入标准。这些研究在中国、新西兰、挪威、巴西、印度尼西亚、加拿大、爱尔兰、英国、美国和澳大利亚等国家进行,涉及护士、患者和医疗团队,研究设计从定性研究和队列研究到准实验和理论分析。这些研究确定了两个关键策略:规范性(遵循指导方针)和反思性(基于批判性的自我反思)。结论反思策略在床边得到了广泛应用,强调了在不确定临床环境中适应性的重要性。尽管人工智能在临床决策中发挥着重要作用,但培养护士的批判性思维和决策技能仍然至关重要。注册osf https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H96VQ.Tweetable摘要一项范围审查确定了护士用于支持临床推理的规范性和反思性床边策略,强调了适应性和批判性思维在复杂护理环境中的价值。#临床推理#护理#病人护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信