An Improved Method for Determining Constriction Size Distribution Using Discrete Element Method and Its Inspiration for Corresponding Laboratory Tests

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Xiang He, Yao Chen, Haijun Hu, Shunxiang Kang, Shaohong Zhang, Meixiao Yang
{"title":"An Improved Method for Determining Constriction Size Distribution Using Discrete Element Method and Its Inspiration for Corresponding Laboratory Tests","authors":"Xiang He,&nbsp;Yao Chen,&nbsp;Haijun Hu,&nbsp;Shunxiang Kang,&nbsp;Shaohong Zhang,&nbsp;Meixiao Yang","doi":"10.1002/nag.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Constriction is defined as the narrowest passages between pores, and constriction size distribution (CSD) is a fundamental property that quantifies the soil retention capability of filters. Although three types of methods have been developed to determine the CSD, that is, analytical, numerical, and experimental methods, these approaches face limitations such as potential inaccuracies or limited applicability. In this paper, the inverse method combined with discrete element method (DEM) proposed by Sjah and Vincens (2013) was improved from several facets, that is, the characterization of the mean distance between adjacent constrictions, the generation of probe particles instead of base soils, the determination of actual path length for probe particles, and the deletion of clogged particles. Then the improved method was compared with the previous one and other analytical and numerical methods. Besides, different confidence levels, that is, maximum probability of failing to traverse through constrictions continuously, were selected in the improved inverse method to investigate the effect of this value on CSD. Furthermore, the effect of probe particles path tortuosity, the clogging of probe particles within the filter, and filter particle shape on CSD were investigated. These findings provide insights for improving the accuracy of CSD determination in laboratory tests.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 15","pages":"3422-3434"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nag.70020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constriction is defined as the narrowest passages between pores, and constriction size distribution (CSD) is a fundamental property that quantifies the soil retention capability of filters. Although three types of methods have been developed to determine the CSD, that is, analytical, numerical, and experimental methods, these approaches face limitations such as potential inaccuracies or limited applicability. In this paper, the inverse method combined with discrete element method (DEM) proposed by Sjah and Vincens (2013) was improved from several facets, that is, the characterization of the mean distance between adjacent constrictions, the generation of probe particles instead of base soils, the determination of actual path length for probe particles, and the deletion of clogged particles. Then the improved method was compared with the previous one and other analytical and numerical methods. Besides, different confidence levels, that is, maximum probability of failing to traverse through constrictions continuously, were selected in the improved inverse method to investigate the effect of this value on CSD. Furthermore, the effect of probe particles path tortuosity, the clogging of probe particles within the filter, and filter particle shape on CSD were investigated. These findings provide insights for improving the accuracy of CSD determination in laboratory tests.

用离散元法确定收缩尺寸分布的改进方法及其对实验室试验的启示
收缩是孔隙之间最窄的通道,收缩尺寸分布(CSD)是量化过滤器持土能力的基本属性。虽然已经开发了三种方法来确定CSD,即分析方法、数值方法和实验方法,但这些方法都面临着诸如潜在的不准确性或有限的适用性等局限性。本文对Sjah和Vincens(2013)提出的与离散元法(DEM)相结合的逆方法进行了改进,从相邻收缩体之间平均距离的表征、探测颗粒代替基土的生成、探测颗粒实际路径长度的确定、堵塞颗粒的删除等几个方面进行了改进。将改进后的方法与原方法及其它解析数值方法进行了比较。此外,在改进的逆方法中,选择不同的置信水平,即连续不通过收缩的最大概率,来研究该值对CSD的影响。此外,还研究了探针颗粒路径弯曲度、探针颗粒在过滤器内的堵塞以及过滤器颗粒形状对CSD的影响。这些发现为提高实验室检测中CSD测定的准确性提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信