Prospective preference assessment for the Ecstasy for Alleviating Severe Chronic Neuropathic Pain (EASE-Pain) trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mindy Lu, Victoria Tucci, Nandana Parakh, Sergio M Pereira, Mariela Leda, Gabriella Mattina, Roshni Nayar, Zaaria Thomas, Janneth Pazmino-Canizares, Karim S Ladha, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Paul Ritvo, Daniel I McIsaac, James Khan, Joshua Rosenblat, Sakina J Rizvi, Gabriel Ramsay, Cheryl Pritlove, Akash Goel
{"title":"Prospective preference assessment for the Ecstasy for Alleviating Severe Chronic Neuropathic Pain (EASE-Pain) trial.","authors":"Mindy Lu, Victoria Tucci, Nandana Parakh, Sergio M Pereira, Mariela Leda, Gabriella Mattina, Roshni Nayar, Zaaria Thomas, Janneth Pazmino-Canizares, Karim S Ladha, Duminda N Wijeysundera, Paul Ritvo, Daniel I McIsaac, James Khan, Joshua Rosenblat, Sakina J Rizvi, Gabriel Ramsay, Cheryl Pritlove, Akash Goel","doi":"10.1007/s12630-025-03031-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emerging evidence suggests that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy may be a promising intervention for chronic pain. We designed the Ecstasy for Alleviating Severe Chronic Neuropathic Pain (EASE-Pain) trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing MDMA with an active placebo (methylphenidate) for pain relief. We sought to conduct a prospective preference assessment (PPA) prior to the trial, with the objectives to 1) assess willingness to participate in the trial, 2) identify participants' motivations and concerns to enhance enrolment and acceptability, and 3) compare demographic and health characteristics between willing and nonwilling participants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited patients from the St. Michael's Hospital Pain Clinic (Toronto, ON, Canada) from July to August 2024. Each participant completed four PPA phases: 1) a trial description, 2) comprehension assessment, 3) open-ended questions exploring attitudes towards the trial, and 4) a self-administered questionnaire. We analyzed data qualitatively using thematic analysis and quantitatively using t tests and Fisher's exact test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 42 patients, with 76% willing and 24% not willing to participate in the EASE-Pain trial. White/European participants were more likely to be willing than not willing to participate (78% vs 40%; P < 0.001). Motivating factors for participation included pain relief (62%) and seeking alternatives to ineffective treatments (26%). Common concerns included side effects (43%), impacts on comorbidities (19%), and the stigma of MDMA (19%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate a strong willingness among patients with chronic pain to participate in the EASE-Pain trial. Primary concerns included side effects and impacts on comorbidities. In response, protocol modifications, including improved patient education on study drug effects, will be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-025-03031-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Emerging evidence suggests that 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-assisted psychotherapy may be a promising intervention for chronic pain. We designed the Ecstasy for Alleviating Severe Chronic Neuropathic Pain (EASE-Pain) trial, a randomized controlled trial comparing MDMA with an active placebo (methylphenidate) for pain relief. We sought to conduct a prospective preference assessment (PPA) prior to the trial, with the objectives to 1) assess willingness to participate in the trial, 2) identify participants' motivations and concerns to enhance enrolment and acceptability, and 3) compare demographic and health characteristics between willing and nonwilling participants.

Methods: We recruited patients from the St. Michael's Hospital Pain Clinic (Toronto, ON, Canada) from July to August 2024. Each participant completed four PPA phases: 1) a trial description, 2) comprehension assessment, 3) open-ended questions exploring attitudes towards the trial, and 4) a self-administered questionnaire. We analyzed data qualitatively using thematic analysis and quantitatively using t tests and Fisher's exact test.

Results: We enrolled 42 patients, with 76% willing and 24% not willing to participate in the EASE-Pain trial. White/European participants were more likely to be willing than not willing to participate (78% vs 40%; P < 0.001). Motivating factors for participation included pain relief (62%) and seeking alternatives to ineffective treatments (26%). Common concerns included side effects (43%), impacts on comorbidities (19%), and the stigma of MDMA (19%).

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate a strong willingness among patients with chronic pain to participate in the EASE-Pain trial. Primary concerns included side effects and impacts on comorbidities. In response, protocol modifications, including improved patient education on study drug effects, will be implemented.

摇头丸缓解重度慢性神经性疼痛(EASE-Pain)试验的前瞻性偏好评估。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)辅助心理治疗可能是一种有希望的慢性疼痛干预措施。我们设计了缓解严重慢性神经性疼痛的摇头丸(EASE-Pain)试验,这是一项比较MDMA和活性安慰剂(哌醋甲酯)缓解疼痛的随机对照试验。我们试图在试验前进行前瞻性偏好评估(PPA),其目标是1)评估参与试验的意愿,2)确定参与者的动机和关注点,以提高入学率和可接受性,以及3)比较自愿和非自愿参与者之间的人口统计学和健康特征。方法:我们于2024年7月至8月从圣迈克尔医院疼痛诊所(多伦多,ON,加拿大)招募患者。每个参与者完成四个PPA阶段:1)试验描述,2)理解评估,3)探索对试验态度的开放式问题,以及4)自我管理的问卷。我们使用专题分析进行定性分析,使用t检验和Fisher精确检验进行定量分析。结果:我们招募了42例患者,其中76%愿意和24%不愿意参加EASE-Pain试验。白人/欧洲人更有可能愿意参加而不是不愿意参加(78%对40%;结论:本研究结果表明慢性疼痛患者有强烈的意愿参加EASE-Pain试验。主要的担忧包括副作用和对合并症的影响。为此,将实施方案修改,包括改进患者对研究药物作用的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信