The Effectiveness of Death Education on Death Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Yawen Su, Shu Zhang, Liyang Duan, Xiaolin Hu
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Death Education on Death Anxiety, Depression, and Quality of Life in Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yawen Su, Shu Zhang, Liyang Duan, Xiaolin Hu","doi":"10.1111/jnu.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with advanced cancer can suffer from serious distress like death anxiety and depression, in addition to facing a reduced quality of life. Death education interventions have been shown to improve these outcomes, but their effectiveness remains unclear, especially in the advanced stages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy of death education interventions on death anxiety, depression, and quality of life in advanced cancer sufferers, and to explore the influence of the intervention site, duration, the age of participants, and dyadic relationships with caregivers on the effectiveness of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of 10 electronic databases identified 19 eligible RCTs with 1531 participants. Data were extracted and analyzed via Review Manager 5.4. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of the intervention site, duration, age of participants, and presence of caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In comparison to the control intervention, the death education intervention notably alleviated death anxiety (SMD = -2.11, 95% CI: -5.91 to -0.89, p = 0.008) and depression (SMD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.18, p = 0.001). Quality of life (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.39-1.33, p = 0.0003) was also significantly improved. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions with longer durations, conducted in professional settings, and targeting younger patients were more likely to be effective in reducing depression and enhancing the quality of life. Interventions without family companionship were more effective in improving depression, while interventions with family companionship were more effective in improving quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Death education interventions are effective at improving death anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Tailoring interventions to individual features and cultural backgrounds is crucial to achieving the best effect.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Death education is an effective and important intervention measure that can help patients with advanced cancer better cope with death anxiety and depressive emotions and improve their quality of life. Clinical medical workers should select appropriate death education programs based on the specific conditions of patients and provide necessary support and guidance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>CRD42024565376.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.70037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with advanced cancer can suffer from serious distress like death anxiety and depression, in addition to facing a reduced quality of life. Death education interventions have been shown to improve these outcomes, but their effectiveness remains unclear, especially in the advanced stages.

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to examine the efficacy of death education interventions on death anxiety, depression, and quality of life in advanced cancer sufferers, and to explore the influence of the intervention site, duration, the age of participants, and dyadic relationships with caregivers on the effectiveness of these interventions.

Design: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was performed.

Methods: A systematic search of 10 electronic databases identified 19 eligible RCTs with 1531 participants. Data were extracted and analyzed via Review Manager 5.4. Subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of the intervention site, duration, age of participants, and presence of caregivers.

Results: In comparison to the control intervention, the death education intervention notably alleviated death anxiety (SMD = -2.11, 95% CI: -5.91 to -0.89, p = 0.008) and depression (SMD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.18, p = 0.001). Quality of life (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.39-1.33, p = 0.0003) was also significantly improved. Subgroup analyses revealed that interventions with longer durations, conducted in professional settings, and targeting younger patients were more likely to be effective in reducing depression and enhancing the quality of life. Interventions without family companionship were more effective in improving depression, while interventions with family companionship were more effective in improving quality of life.

Conclusion: Death education interventions are effective at improving death anxiety, depression, and quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. Tailoring interventions to individual features and cultural backgrounds is crucial to achieving the best effect.

Clinical relevance: Death education is an effective and important intervention measure that can help patients with advanced cancer better cope with death anxiety and depressive emotions and improve their quality of life. Clinical medical workers should select appropriate death education programs based on the specific conditions of patients and provide necessary support and guidance.

Trial registration: CRD42024565376.

死亡教育对晚期癌症患者死亡焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
背景:晚期癌症患者除了面临生活质量下降外,还可能遭受严重的痛苦,如死亡焦虑和抑郁。死亡教育干预已被证明可以改善这些结果,但其有效性尚不清楚,特别是在晚期。目的:本荟萃分析旨在探讨死亡教育干预对晚期癌症患者死亡焦虑、抑郁和生活质量的影响,并探讨干预地点、持续时间、参与者年龄和与照顾者的二元关系对干预效果的影响。设计:进行随机对照试验的荟萃分析。方法:系统检索10个电子数据库,确定19项符合条件的随机对照试验,共1531名受试者。通过Review Manager 5.4提取和分析数据。亚组分析是根据干预地点、持续时间、参与者年龄和护理人员的存在进行的。结果:与对照干预相比,死亡教育干预显著缓解了死亡焦虑(SMD = -2.11, 95% CI: -5.91 ~ -0.89, p = 0.008)和抑郁(SMD = -0.45, 95% CI: -0.72 ~ -0.18, p = 0.001)。生活质量(SMD = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.39-1.33, p = 0.0003)也显著改善。亚组分析显示,在专业环境中进行的持续时间较长的干预措施,针对年轻患者,更有可能有效地减少抑郁症,提高生活质量。没有家庭陪伴的干预在改善抑郁方面更有效,而有家庭陪伴的干预在改善生活质量方面更有效。结论:死亡教育干预可有效改善晚期癌症患者的死亡焦虑、抑郁和生活质量。根据个体特征和文化背景量身定制干预措施对于达到最佳效果至关重要。临床意义:死亡教育是一项有效而重要的干预措施,可以帮助晚期癌症患者更好地应对死亡焦虑和抑郁情绪,提高生活质量。临床医务工作者应根据患者的具体情况选择合适的死亡教育方案,并给予必要的支持和指导。试验注册:CRD42024565376。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信