Process Validation for Lyophilized Drug Products: Comparing a Program for Continued Process Verification in Different Lyophilized Products: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.

Q3 Medicine
Abirami Natesh, Denise Miller
{"title":"Process Validation for Lyophilized Drug Products: Comparing a Program for Continued Process Verification in Different Lyophilized Products: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.","authors":"Abirami Natesh, Denise Miller","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The 2011 FDA Guidance for Industry, \"Process Validation: General Principles and Practices,\" emphasizes maintaining control of manufacturing processes throughout the product lifecycle through constant reevaluation. For lyophilized drug products, Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) identified in Stage 1 can be effectively trended and reported annually. However, monitoring Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) such as shelf temperature, chamber pressure, and time presents greater challenges. Methods like comparing actual variation to averages, targets, or proven acceptable ranges (PARs) are defined in Stage 1, validated in Stage 2, and continually assured in Stage 3. Demonstrating a state of control for lyophilization parameters is vital, yet complex. Previously, classical statistical methods were used to evaluate process variability by analyzing data from multiple batches of the same product. These techniques revealed actionable insights into maintaining consistent control. However, in a multiple product facility, utilizing multiple methods to analyze various products can be inexpedient. Expanding on previous research, various batches of lyophilized products were assessed to verify the relative robustness of a specific statistical methodology for the sake of efficiency. This analysis underscores the importance of continual monitoring in lyophilization to ensure product quality and regulatory compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"79 4","pages":"426-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2011 FDA Guidance for Industry, "Process Validation: General Principles and Practices," emphasizes maintaining control of manufacturing processes throughout the product lifecycle through constant reevaluation. For lyophilized drug products, Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) identified in Stage 1 can be effectively trended and reported annually. However, monitoring Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) such as shelf temperature, chamber pressure, and time presents greater challenges. Methods like comparing actual variation to averages, targets, or proven acceptable ranges (PARs) are defined in Stage 1, validated in Stage 2, and continually assured in Stage 3. Demonstrating a state of control for lyophilization parameters is vital, yet complex. Previously, classical statistical methods were used to evaluate process variability by analyzing data from multiple batches of the same product. These techniques revealed actionable insights into maintaining consistent control. However, in a multiple product facility, utilizing multiple methods to analyze various products can be inexpedient. Expanding on previous research, various batches of lyophilized products were assessed to verify the relative robustness of a specific statistical methodology for the sake of efficiency. This analysis underscores the importance of continual monitoring in lyophilization to ensure product quality and regulatory compliance.

冻干药品的工艺验证:比较不同冻干产品的持续工艺验证程序:2025年PDA周上发布的海报
2011年FDA工业指南“工艺验证:一般原则和实践”强调通过不断的再评估来保持对整个产品生命周期生产过程的控制。对于冻干药品,在阶段1中确定的关键质量属性(cqa)可以有效地进行趋势分析并每年报告。然而,监测关键工艺参数(CPPs),如货架温度,腔室压力和时间提出了更大的挑战。将实际变化与平均值、目标或已证明的可接受范围(par)进行比较等方法在阶段1中定义,在阶段2中验证,并在阶段3中不断得到保证。演示对冻干参数的控制状态是至关重要的,但也很复杂。以前,经典的统计方法是通过分析同一产品的多批次数据来评估工艺变异性。这些技术揭示了维护一致控制的可行见解。然而,在多产品设施中,使用多种方法来分析各种产品可能是不方便的。在先前研究的基础上,对不同批次的冻干产品进行了评估,以验证特定统计方法的相对稳健性,以提高效率。这一分析强调了持续监测冻干的重要性,以确保产品质量和法规遵从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信