A Novel Automated Approach to Surface Swab Sampling: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.

Q3 Medicine
Keith Bader, Richard Mineo, Nicole Coller, Michael Lund, Linda Long
{"title":"A Novel Automated Approach to Surface Swab Sampling: Poster Presented at PDA Week 2025.","authors":"Keith Bader, Richard Mineo, Nicole Coller, Michael Lund, Linda Long","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analytical testing and an appropriate sampling method are instrumental in confirming that equipment surfaces have been adequately cleaned during cleaning validation or verification activities. Surface swab sampling is performed manually by directly holding the swab (hand swabbing) or attaching the swab to the end of an extension pole (remote swabbing). This study evaluated the performance of a prototype automated swabbing device constructed from configurable microcontrollers, microelectronics, and electromechanical components against representative manual sampling methodologies. Automated swab sampling of pharmaceutical manufacturing equipment offers several advantages over hand swabbing or remote swabbing, including decreased variability, the necessity for swab qualification of operators, increased accuracy versus remote swabbing, and decreased risk to personnel. To determine if automated swabbing can replace the current state of the art in manual swabbing, The Hyde Analytical Laboratory performed a comparative analysis of manual swabbing methods, hand and remote, and an automated swabbing method using a prototype device developed by Swabbot Solutions. This case study tested the three swabbing methods using multiple replicates, concentrations, representative soils, and controls to gauge the relative recovery performance of the accuracy and variability of each method.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":"79 4","pages":"446-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2025.25412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analytical testing and an appropriate sampling method are instrumental in confirming that equipment surfaces have been adequately cleaned during cleaning validation or verification activities. Surface swab sampling is performed manually by directly holding the swab (hand swabbing) or attaching the swab to the end of an extension pole (remote swabbing). This study evaluated the performance of a prototype automated swabbing device constructed from configurable microcontrollers, microelectronics, and electromechanical components against representative manual sampling methodologies. Automated swab sampling of pharmaceutical manufacturing equipment offers several advantages over hand swabbing or remote swabbing, including decreased variability, the necessity for swab qualification of operators, increased accuracy versus remote swabbing, and decreased risk to personnel. To determine if automated swabbing can replace the current state of the art in manual swabbing, The Hyde Analytical Laboratory performed a comparative analysis of manual swabbing methods, hand and remote, and an automated swabbing method using a prototype device developed by Swabbot Solutions. This case study tested the three swabbing methods using multiple replicates, concentrations, representative soils, and controls to gauge the relative recovery performance of the accuracy and variability of each method.

一种新的自动化表面拭子取样方法:在2025年PDA周上发表的海报。
分析测试和适当的取样方法有助于确认在清洁确认或验证活动中设备表面已被充分清洁。通过直接拿着拭子(手拭子)或将拭子附着在延长杆的末端(远程拭子),手动进行表面拭子采样。本研究评估了由可配置微控制器、微电子元件和机电元件构成的自动取样装置原型的性能,并与典型的手动取样方法进行对比。与手动拭子或远程拭子相比,制药设备的自动拭子取样具有几个优点,包括减少可变性,对操作人员进行拭子资格认证的必要性,与远程拭子相比提高了准确性,并降低了人员风险。为了确定自动拭子是否可以取代目前最先进的人工拭子,Hyde分析实验室使用Swabbot Solutions开发的原型设备对手动拭子方法(手动和远程)和自动拭子方法进行了比较分析。本案例研究通过多次重复、浓度、代表性土壤和对照测试了三种抽吸方法,以衡量每种方法的准确性和可变性的相对恢复性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信