Impact of Adjuvant Analgesics on Outcomes of Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Scoping Review.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnaf105
Yilin Zhang, Sachin Sahni, Olivia Chung, Pranab Kumar, Abeer Alomari, Salim Hayek, Anuj Bhatia
{"title":"Impact of Adjuvant Analgesics on Outcomes of Spinal Cord and Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Yilin Zhang, Sachin Sahni, Olivia Chung, Pranab Kumar, Abeer Alomari, Salim Hayek, Anuj Bhatia","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnaf105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) are used to treat refractory pain, but even well-selected patients can fail to have analgesic benefit following implantation. The analgesia afforded by SCS/PNS may be enhanced or attenuated by the ongoing use of analgesic medications that are often consumed by patients who receive SCS and PNS implants. We undertook a scoping review to scan and summarize the evidence for impact of adjuvant pharmacotherapy on SCS and PNS therapy in animal and human settings.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A comprehensive medical literature review was performed on major medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Google Scholar from inception until July 31, 2024, for both human and animal studies. Data on the effect of pharmacotherapy on SCS analgesic efficacy and adverse effects was extracted and summarized using the Arksey and O'Malley population, concept, context (PCC) model for scoping reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven studies, nine on animals and 18 on humans were identified. In human studies, SCS non-responders with neuropathic pain had analgesia restored by addition of intrathecal baclofen and clonidine. Patients who eliminated opioid use, or who were opioid naive, had superior clinical outcomes with SCS compared to those continuing opioids. Cannabinoids were associated with enhanced SCS analgesia. Patients on benzodiazepines had higher likelihood of SCS explantation. Animal studies showed intrathecal ketamine restored SCS analgesic benefits, while baclofen, clonidine, cannabinoid receptor agonists, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, augmented SCS responses while benzodiazepines were found to inhibit analgesic effects of PNS (see Figure 1-Graphical abstract).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review indicates that adjunctive analgesic therapy may play a significant role in either enhancing or attenuating analgesic benefits from SCS and PNS. By optimizing the use of analgesic medications, it may be possible to restore or enhance pain relief from both SCS and PNS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf105","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) are used to treat refractory pain, but even well-selected patients can fail to have analgesic benefit following implantation. The analgesia afforded by SCS/PNS may be enhanced or attenuated by the ongoing use of analgesic medications that are often consumed by patients who receive SCS and PNS implants. We undertook a scoping review to scan and summarize the evidence for impact of adjuvant pharmacotherapy on SCS and PNS therapy in animal and human settings.

Materials and methods: A comprehensive medical literature review was performed on major medical databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Google Scholar from inception until July 31, 2024, for both human and animal studies. Data on the effect of pharmacotherapy on SCS analgesic efficacy and adverse effects was extracted and summarized using the Arksey and O'Malley population, concept, context (PCC) model for scoping reviews.

Results: Twenty-seven studies, nine on animals and 18 on humans were identified. In human studies, SCS non-responders with neuropathic pain had analgesia restored by addition of intrathecal baclofen and clonidine. Patients who eliminated opioid use, or who were opioid naive, had superior clinical outcomes with SCS compared to those continuing opioids. Cannabinoids were associated with enhanced SCS analgesia. Patients on benzodiazepines had higher likelihood of SCS explantation. Animal studies showed intrathecal ketamine restored SCS analgesic benefits, while baclofen, clonidine, cannabinoid receptor agonists, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, augmented SCS responses while benzodiazepines were found to inhibit analgesic effects of PNS (see Figure 1-Graphical abstract).

Conclusions: This review indicates that adjunctive analgesic therapy may play a significant role in either enhancing or attenuating analgesic benefits from SCS and PNS. By optimizing the use of analgesic medications, it may be possible to restore or enhance pain relief from both SCS and PNS.

辅助镇痛药对脊髓和周围神经刺激结果的影响:范围综述。
脊髓刺激(SCS)和周围神经刺激(PNS)用于治疗难治性疼痛,但即使是经过精心挑选的患者,植入后也可能无法获得镇痛益处。接受SCS和PNS植入物的患者经常使用镇痛药物,通过持续使用这些药物,SCS/PNS提供的镇痛作用可能会增强或减弱。我们进行了一项范围综述,以扫描和总结在动物和人类环境中辅助药物治疗对SCS和PNS治疗的影响的证据。材料和方法:在MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL和谷歌Scholar等主要医学数据库中进行了全面的医学文献综述,从成立到2024年7月31日,包括人类和动物研究。采用Arksey和O'Malley人群、概念、背景(PCC)模型对药物治疗对SCS镇痛疗效和不良反应的影响进行数据提取和总结,以进行范围评价。结果:27项研究,9项动物研究,18项人类研究。在人体研究中,SCS无反应的神经性疼痛患者通过鞘内添加巴氯芬和可乐定恢复了镇痛。与持续使用阿片类药物的患者相比,停用阿片类药物或未使用阿片类药物的患者使用SCS的临床结果更好。大麻素与增强SCS镇痛相关。服用苯二氮卓类药物的患者SCS外植的可能性更高。动物研究显示鞘内氯胺酮恢复了SCS的镇痛作用,而巴氯芬、氯定、大麻素受体激动剂、三环抗抑郁药、血清素和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂增强了SCS的镇痛作用,而苯二氮卓类药物则抑制了PNS的镇痛作用(见图1)。结论:本综述表明,辅助镇痛治疗可能在增强或减弱SCS和PNS的镇痛作用中发挥重要作用。通过优化镇痛药物的使用,有可能恢复或增强SCS和PNS的疼痛缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信