Outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Wound Management in Pediatric Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Study From a Resource-Limited Setting.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162495
Vaibhav Pandey, Shashi Prakash Mishra, Marripati Bhanumurthy Kaushik, Manish Khobragade, Sunil Kumar Singh Gaur, Ruchira Nandan
{"title":"Outcomes of Vacuum-Assisted and Conventional Wound Management in Pediatric Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Study From a Resource-Limited Setting.","authors":"Vaibhav Pandey, Shashi Prakash Mishra, Marripati Bhanumurthy Kaushik, Manish Khobragade, Sunil Kumar Singh Gaur, Ruchira Nandan","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complicated abdominal wounds following pediatric laparotomy, particularly in cases of enterocutaneous fistulae, trauma, or re-exploration, present significant management challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Despite evidence supporting vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in adults, its use in pediatric populations remains limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of vacuum-assisted and conventional wound management techniques in pediatric abdominal surgery within a resource-constrained environment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric surgical centre in Northern India from January 2016 to December 2024. A total of 43 children (0-18 years) with complicated postoperative abdominal wounds were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 19) underwent traditional wound closure, while Group 2 (n = 24) received wound management using VAC therapy or simple wound manager systems. Primary outcomes were time to wound healing and incidence of wound-related complications. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, re-exploration, and spontaneous fistula closure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The wound manager group showed a slightly longer median healing time (15 vs. 12 days) but had zero re-explorations compared to three cases in the traditional group (p = 0.0011). VAC therapy led to earlier granulation (median 6 vs. 10 days), greater complete epithelialization (80 % vs. 40 %, p = 0.04), and spontaneous closure in 20 % of enterocutaneous fistulas. Four patients continued VAC therapy at home without complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VAC and simple wound manager systems are effective in managing complex pediatric abdominal wounds, reducing the need for reoperation and enhancing healing outcomes. Their adoption in low-resource settings could significantly improve pediatric surgical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"162495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162495","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complicated abdominal wounds following pediatric laparotomy, particularly in cases of enterocutaneous fistulae, trauma, or re-exploration, present significant management challenges, especially in resource-limited settings. Despite evidence supporting vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy in adults, its use in pediatric populations remains limited.

Aim: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of vacuum-assisted and conventional wound management techniques in pediatric abdominal surgery within a resource-constrained environment.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric surgical centre in Northern India from January 2016 to December 2024. A total of 43 children (0-18 years) with complicated postoperative abdominal wounds were included. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 19) underwent traditional wound closure, while Group 2 (n = 24) received wound management using VAC therapy or simple wound manager systems. Primary outcomes were time to wound healing and incidence of wound-related complications. Secondary outcomes included hospital stay, re-exploration, and spontaneous fistula closure.

Results: The wound manager group showed a slightly longer median healing time (15 vs. 12 days) but had zero re-explorations compared to three cases in the traditional group (p = 0.0011). VAC therapy led to earlier granulation (median 6 vs. 10 days), greater complete epithelialization (80 % vs. 40 %, p = 0.04), and spontaneous closure in 20 % of enterocutaneous fistulas. Four patients continued VAC therapy at home without complications.

Conclusion: VAC and simple wound manager systems are effective in managing complex pediatric abdominal wounds, reducing the need for reoperation and enhancing healing outcomes. Their adoption in low-resource settings could significantly improve pediatric surgical care.

儿童腹部手术中真空辅助和传统伤口处理的结果:一项资源有限的回顾性研究。
背景:儿童剖腹手术后的复杂腹部伤口,特别是肠皮瘘、创伤或再探查的病例,在资源有限的情况下,提出了重大的管理挑战。尽管有证据支持成人真空辅助封闭(VAC)治疗,但其在儿科人群中的应用仍然有限。目的:本研究旨在评估和比较在资源受限的环境下,真空辅助和传统伤口管理技术在儿科腹部手术中的效果。方法:2016年1月至2024年12月在印度北部一家三级儿科外科中心进行回顾性观察研究。本研究共纳入43例0 ~ 18岁的腹部术后并发症患儿。患者分为两组:1组(n=19)采用传统的伤口闭合,2组(n=24)采用VAC治疗或简单的伤口管理系统进行伤口管理。主要结局是伤口愈合时间和伤口相关并发症的发生率。次要结局包括住院时间、再次探查和自发瘘管闭合。结果:创面管理组的中位愈合时间略长(15天vs. 12天),但与传统组的3例相比,创面管理组没有再探查(p=0.0011)。VAC治疗导致早期肉芽形成(中位6天vs. 10天),更完全的上皮化(80% vs. 40%, p=0.04), 20%的肠皮瘘自然闭合。4例患者继续在家中进行VAC治疗,无并发症。结论:VAC和简单的伤口管理系统在处理复杂的儿科腹部伤口方面是有效的,减少了再手术的需要,提高了愈合效果。在资源匮乏的环境中采用它们可以显著改善儿科外科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信