Xiao Zhang, Yubo Xiao, Junyi Wu, Scott Marshall, Xuan Zhou
{"title":"Pharmacometric Model-Based Sample Size Allocation for a Region of Interest in a Multi-Regional Phase 2 Trial: A Case Study of an Anti-Psoriatic Drug.","authors":"Xiao Zhang, Yubo Xiao, Junyi Wu, Scott Marshall, Xuan Zhou","doi":"10.1002/psp4.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Phase 2 trials have historically focused on characterizing the dose-exposure-response relationship in relatively homogeneous patient populations before proceeding to confirmatory trials. However, with the rise of multi-regional Phase 2 trials, it is important to strike a balance between this goal and the requirement to make sure that the optimal doses are chosen for patients from various geographic areas. This study uses a dose-ranging trial for an anti-psoriatic drug, featuring a typical design with a total sample size of N = 175, to highlight key considerations regarding sample size in multi-regional exploratory studies. The allocation of sample size to a region of interest (Region X) was evaluated using both a conventional statistical approach and a pharmacometric model-based (PMx) approach, predicated on the assumption of a minimum treatment improvement in Region X. Further evaluation was performed to assess the probability of reaching reliable conclusions regarding clinically relevant inter-regional differences in treatment response. The statistical approach, relying solely on end-of-trial observations from a single dose group, exhibited a maximum power of less than 40% in detecting treatment differences across regions when Region X accounts for 50% of the total sample size. In contrast, the PMx approach, employing data from multiple dose groups across trial duration, demonstrated that 26% of the total sample size yielded over 80% power to identify the inter-regional difference. The PMx approach has also been shown to offer a more efficient characterization of the clinical relevance of inter-regional differences, and has potential to improve decision-making in development progression by integrating prior knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phase 2 trials have historically focused on characterizing the dose-exposure-response relationship in relatively homogeneous patient populations before proceeding to confirmatory trials. However, with the rise of multi-regional Phase 2 trials, it is important to strike a balance between this goal and the requirement to make sure that the optimal doses are chosen for patients from various geographic areas. This study uses a dose-ranging trial for an anti-psoriatic drug, featuring a typical design with a total sample size of N = 175, to highlight key considerations regarding sample size in multi-regional exploratory studies. The allocation of sample size to a region of interest (Region X) was evaluated using both a conventional statistical approach and a pharmacometric model-based (PMx) approach, predicated on the assumption of a minimum treatment improvement in Region X. Further evaluation was performed to assess the probability of reaching reliable conclusions regarding clinically relevant inter-regional differences in treatment response. The statistical approach, relying solely on end-of-trial observations from a single dose group, exhibited a maximum power of less than 40% in detecting treatment differences across regions when Region X accounts for 50% of the total sample size. In contrast, the PMx approach, employing data from multiple dose groups across trial duration, demonstrated that 26% of the total sample size yielded over 80% power to identify the inter-regional difference. The PMx approach has also been shown to offer a more efficient characterization of the clinical relevance of inter-regional differences, and has potential to improve decision-making in development progression by integrating prior knowledge.