Entering a No Diaper Zone: Rethinking Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kathryn Cabral, Victoria Anderson, Isabel Allen, Dorian Hoskins, Kristen Byers, Margaret Gettis
{"title":"Entering a No Diaper Zone: Rethinking Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection.","authors":"Kathryn Cabral, Victoria Anderson, Isabel Allen, Dorian Hoskins, Kristen Byers, Margaret Gettis","doi":"10.4037/ccn2025843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are a leading hospital-acquired infection and are a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs, with 83% of pediatric cases occurring in pediatric intensive care units. Indwelling urinary catheters are widely used in adult and pediatric patients to accurately monitor urine output and manage fluid balance.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Staffing challenges and high nurse turnover in a 56-bed pediatric intensive care unit led to inconsistencies in practices to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Stool contamination from diapers used alongside indwelling urinary catheters increased the risk of infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interprofessional team designed a comprehensive catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention strategy through plan-do-study-act cycles. Compliance was tracked through electronic surveys during catheter-associated urinary tract infection huddles, bedside infection prevention rounds, and bundle audits, with statistical process control charts used to measure infection rates before and after implementation of interventions. Interventions consisted of introduction of an exploratory no-diapering protocol, use of an advanced indwelling urinary catheter drainage system, and consistent staff reeducation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection decreased from 3.13 to 0 per 1000 catheter days, with 527 event-free days (about 1.5 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of an advanced indwelling urinary catheter drainage system, elimination of diapers, and structured staff reeducation reduced the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the pediatric intensive care unit. This approach has potential for application in both pediatric and adult critical care settings to reduce infection rates and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"45 4","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2025843","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are a leading hospital-acquired infection and are a major cause of increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs, with 83% of pediatric cases occurring in pediatric intensive care units. Indwelling urinary catheters are widely used in adult and pediatric patients to accurately monitor urine output and manage fluid balance.

Local problem: Staffing challenges and high nurse turnover in a 56-bed pediatric intensive care unit led to inconsistencies in practices to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infection. Stool contamination from diapers used alongside indwelling urinary catheters increased the risk of infection.

Methods: An interprofessional team designed a comprehensive catheter-associated urinary tract infection prevention strategy through plan-do-study-act cycles. Compliance was tracked through electronic surveys during catheter-associated urinary tract infection huddles, bedside infection prevention rounds, and bundle audits, with statistical process control charts used to measure infection rates before and after implementation of interventions. Interventions consisted of introduction of an exploratory no-diapering protocol, use of an advanced indwelling urinary catheter drainage system, and consistent staff reeducation.

Results: The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection decreased from 3.13 to 0 per 1000 catheter days, with 527 event-free days (about 1.5 years).

Conclusion: The combination of an advanced indwelling urinary catheter drainage system, elimination of diapers, and structured staff reeducation reduced the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the pediatric intensive care unit. This approach has potential for application in both pediatric and adult critical care settings to reduce infection rates and improve patient outcomes.

进入无尿布区:重新思考导尿管相关尿路感染的预防。
背景:导尿管相关性尿路感染是一种主要的医院获得性感染,是发病率、死亡率和医疗费用增加的主要原因,83%的儿科病例发生在儿科重症监护病房。留置导尿管广泛应用于成人和儿童患者,以准确监测尿量和控制体液平衡。当地问题:在56张床位的儿科重症监护室,人员配置挑战和护士高流动率导致预防导尿管相关性尿路感染的实践不一致。尿不湿与留置导尿管一起使用导致的粪便污染增加了感染的风险。方法:一个跨专业团队设计了一个综合的导尿管相关尿路感染预防策略,通过计划-做-研究-行动周期。在导尿管相关尿路感染会议、床边感染预防查房和捆绑审计期间,通过电子调查跟踪依从性,并使用统计过程控制图来测量实施干预前后的感染率。干预措施包括引入探索性无尿布方案,使用先进的留置导尿管引流系统,以及持续的员工再教育。结果:导管相关性尿路感染发生率由3.13 / 1000天下降至0 / 1000天,无事件发生527天(约1.5年)。结论:采用先进的留置导尿管引流系统,取消尿不湿,并对工作人员进行有组织的再教育,可降低儿科重症监护病房导尿管相关尿路感染的发生率。这种方法有潜力应用于儿科和成人重症监护环境,以降低感染率和改善患者预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信