Diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy for breast conserving surgery.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s10549-025-07790-8
Dhurka Shanthakumar, Vadzim Chalau, Yufeng Shi, Ria Ranjitkar, Anna Silvanto, Ara Darzi, Daniel R Leff, Daniel S Elson
{"title":"Diffuse reflectance and fluorescence spectroscopy for breast conserving surgery.","authors":"Dhurka Shanthakumar, Vadzim Chalau, Yufeng Shi, Ria Ranjitkar, Anna Silvanto, Ara Darzi, Daniel R Leff, Daniel S Elson","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07790-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The major challenge in breast conserving surgery is the high rates of re-excision due to positive resection margins. This study evaluates whether a combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and laser induced intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy (IFS) technique can differentiate breast tissue sample types, towards the development of an intraoperative margin assessment tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Breast tissue samples were collected from patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. A handheld DRS-IFS probe was used on the frozen thawed ex-vivo  breast samples to acquire spectral data. Machine learning classifiers were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) against \"gold-standard\" histopathology ground truth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>181 breast tissue samples from 138 patients were interrogated using DRS-IFS. All patients were female, with median age (range) of 56.8 (20-94) years The total number of spectra acquired was 18,349. Following five-fold cross validation for normal versus cancer tissue, extreme gradient boost classifier achieved a sensitivity of 84% (SD ± 13), specificity of 61% (SD ± 16), overall diagnostic accuracy of 75% (SD ± 3), and AUC of 84%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggests that DRS-IFS can distinguish normal breast tissue from breast cancer with high diagnostic accuracy. For DRS-IFS to be translated into the operating theatre to aid a surgeon's real-time visualisation for oncologic margin control assessment of intraoperative, the in vivo diagnostic accuracy needs to be determined.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"25-36"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07790-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The major challenge in breast conserving surgery is the high rates of re-excision due to positive resection margins. This study evaluates whether a combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and laser induced intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy (IFS) technique can differentiate breast tissue sample types, towards the development of an intraoperative margin assessment tool.

Methods: Breast tissue samples were collected from patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. A handheld DRS-IFS probe was used on the frozen thawed ex-vivo  breast samples to acquire spectral data. Machine learning classifiers were used to determine sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic accuracy, and the area under the curve (AUC) against "gold-standard" histopathology ground truth.

Results: 181 breast tissue samples from 138 patients were interrogated using DRS-IFS. All patients were female, with median age (range) of 56.8 (20-94) years The total number of spectra acquired was 18,349. Following five-fold cross validation for normal versus cancer tissue, extreme gradient boost classifier achieved a sensitivity of 84% (SD ± 13), specificity of 61% (SD ± 16), overall diagnostic accuracy of 75% (SD ± 3), and AUC of 84%.

Conclusion: The results suggests that DRS-IFS can distinguish normal breast tissue from breast cancer with high diagnostic accuracy. For DRS-IFS to be translated into the operating theatre to aid a surgeon's real-time visualisation for oncologic margin control assessment of intraoperative, the in vivo diagnostic accuracy needs to be determined.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

保乳手术的漫反射和荧光光谱分析。
目的:保乳手术面临的主要挑战是由于切缘阳性导致的再切除率高。本研究评估了漫反射光谱(DRS)和激光诱导本征荧光光谱(IFS)联合技术是否可以区分乳腺组织样本类型,以开发一种术中边缘评估工具。方法:采集乳腺癌手术患者的乳腺组织标本。采用手持式dr - ifs探针对冻融离体乳腺样品进行光谱采集。使用机器学习分类器来确定灵敏度、特异性、总体诊断准确性和曲线下面积(AUC),以对抗“金标准”组织病理学基础真理。结果:采用DRS-IFS对138例患者的181份乳腺组织样本进行了分析。所有患者均为女性,年龄中位数(范围)为56.8岁(20 ~ 94岁)。获得的光谱总数为18349张。在对正常组织和癌组织进行五倍交叉验证后,极端梯度增强分类器的灵敏度为84% (SD±13),特异性为61% (SD±16),总体诊断准确率为75% (SD±3),AUC为84%。结论:DRS-IFS能够区分正常乳腺组织和乳腺癌组织,诊断准确率高。为了将DRS-IFS应用于手术室,以帮助外科医生实时可视化术中肿瘤边缘控制评估,需要确定体内诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信