Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
BioDrugs Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y
Félix Lobo, Isabel Río-Álvarez, Ángeles Flores
{"title":"Individual Prescribing Incentives for Biosimilars in Selected European Countries and the USA: a Scoping Literature Review.","authors":"Félix Lobo, Isabel Río-Álvarez, Ángeles Flores","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"777-791"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00736-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The uptake of biosimilar medicines in Europe and the USA remains highly variable and at times slow, despite the significant potential for cost savings for both patients and healthcare systems. One of the most recommended measures to address this issue is the use of prescribing incentives. On the basis of a well-defined concept of individual prescribing incentives, we conducted a scoping literature review aimed at exploring their role in promoting the uptake of biosimilars in six countries with advanced healthcare systems (the USA, Denmark, England, Italy, France and Germany), with a particular focus on gain-sharing initiatives. Online databases and other sources were used to identify papers published between 2010 and 2023, resulting in the selection of 47 publications. The results suggest that there are few real-world programmes that use provider incentives offered by health systems to encourage prescribing of biosimilars. However, we found gain-sharing schemes of particular interest in England, Italy, France and Germany, where savings are reinvested to improve the quality of care, incentivizing physicians and raising satisfaction, but without financial rewards. In contrast, we found unplanned disincentives hindering the uptake of biosimilars in the USA, as well as very successful top-down strategies that do not rely on individual incentives, including centralized procurement in Denmark, although it remains to be seen whether the success is idiosyncratic to its specific circumstances. In addition, the hypothesis that gain-sharing initiatives with the aforementioned characteristics are more adaptable to different cultural, organizational and political settings to promote biosimilar prescribing merits further research.

在选定的欧洲国家和美国生物仿制药的个人处方激励:范围文献综述。
在欧洲和美国,生物仿制药的应用仍然变化很大,有时还很缓慢,尽管这对患者和医疗保健系统都有巨大的成本节约潜力。解决这一问题的最受建议的措施之一是使用处方激励措施。基于个人处方激励的明确概念,我们进行了一项范围界定的文献综述,旨在探索它们在六个拥有先进医疗系统的国家(美国、丹麦、英国、意大利、法国和德国)促进生物仿制药吸收方面的作用,特别关注收益分享倡议。使用在线数据库和其他来源来识别2010年至2023年之间发表的论文,最终选择了47篇出版物。结果表明,很少有现实世界的规划利用卫生系统提供的提供者激励来鼓励开具生物仿制药处方。然而,我们在英国、意大利、法国和德国发现了特别有趣的收益分享计划,在这些国家,储蓄被再投资于提高护理质量、激励医生和提高满意度,但没有经济回报。相比之下,我们发现计划外的抑制因素阻碍了美国生物仿制药的吸收,以及非常成功的自上而下的策略,这些策略不依赖于个人激励,包括丹麦的集中采购,尽管成功是否取决于其具体情况还有待观察。此外,具有上述特征的收益共享倡议更适合不同的文化、组织和政治环境,以促进生物仿制药处方,这一假设值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BioDrugs
BioDrugs 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies. BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease. BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信