Correction: Electrical impedance tomography-guided the optimal awake prone position in a moderate ARDS patient

Abstract

Correction: Crit Care (2025) 29:95 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05332-8

Following publication of the original article [1], the authors identified an error in Fig. 1F. Thinker’s position should be 320, however it appeared as 20. Both the incorrect and correct Fig. 1 is given hereafter.

The incorrect Fig. 1:

Fig. 1 Changes in lung ventilation status and S/F, RR, and ROX of the patient in different positions under EIT monitoring. A shows the EIT images from the first day to the third day. The images in each panel from top to bottom are: global impedance waveforms, tidal impedance variation distribution (RVD: region ventilation delay, in yellow), difference image (CW: compliance win, in turquoise; CL: compliance loss, in orange), and data trend chart. (I), (II), (III), and (IV) in Figure A represent the supine position, semi-recumbent position, “Thinker’s position”, and prone position respectively, and each position was maintained for 10 min. B shows the changes in the global inhomogeneity index (GI) of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the first and second days. C shows the changes in the ventilation center (CoV) of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the first and second days. D shows the changes in GI and CoV of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the third day. E shows the changes in the patient’s respiratory rate and ROX index during the 2-h maintenance of the“Thinker’s position (TP)”. F shows the changes in S/F, RR, and ROX of the patient in different positions from the first day to the third day

The correct Fig. 1:

Fig. 1

Changes in lung ventilation status and S/F, RR, and ROX of the patient in different positions under EIT monitoring. A shows the EIT images from the first day to the third day. The images in each panel from top to bottom are: global impedance waveforms, tidal impedance variation distribution (RVD: region ventilation delay, in yellow), difference image (CW: compliance win, in turquoise; CL: compliance loss, in orange), and data trend chart. (I), (II), (III), and (IV) in Figure A represent the supine position, semi-recumbent position, “Thinker’s position”, and prone position respectively, and each position was maintained for 10 min. B shows the changes in the global inhomogeneity index (GI) of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the first and second days. C shows the changes in the ventilation center (CoV) of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the first and second days. D shows the changes in GI and CoV of the lungs in different positions monitored by EIT on the third day. E shows the changes in the patient’s respiratory rate and ROX index during the 2-h maintenance of the“Thinker’s position (TP)”. F shows the changes in S/F, RR, and ROX of the patient in different positions from the first day to the third day

Full size image

Figure 1(F) has been updated in this correction article and the original article [1] has been corrected.

1. Sun Y, Tao J, Jiang J, et al. Electrical impedance tomography-guided the optimal awake prone position in a moderate ARDS patient. Crit Care. 2025;29:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05332-8.

   Article Google Scholar

Download references

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of ShaoXing University, Zhejiang, China

   Yongzhen Sun

2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China

   Yongzhen Sun, Jiale Tao, Jinjun Jiang & Shujing Chen

Authors

1. Yongzhen SunView author publications

   Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

2. Jiale TaoView author publications

   Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

3. Jinjun JiangView author publications

   Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

4. Shujing ChenView author publications

   Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujing Chen.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Tao, J., Jiang, J. et al. Correction: Electrical impedance tomography-guided the optimal awake prone position in a moderate ARDS patient. Crit Care 29, 341 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05584-4

Download citation

• Published: 01 August 2025

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05584-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Get shareable link

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Copy to clipboard

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative