Visioning future treescapes in upland landscapes: using deliberative processes to understand values and land-use preferences of local stakeholders.

IF 3.7 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England) Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/26395916.2025.2497823
Alix Syder, Susan Baker, Euan Bowditch, Sheena Carlisle, Tom Finch, Melissa Minter, Natasha Constant
{"title":"Visioning future treescapes in upland landscapes: using deliberative processes to understand values and land-use preferences of local stakeholders.","authors":"Alix Syder, Susan Baker, Euan Bowditch, Sheena Carlisle, Tom Finch, Melissa Minter, Natasha Constant","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2025.2497823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>UK environmental policy places an increasing emphasis on large-scale land-use change, with tree-planting objectives set to contribute towards meeting legislated climate and environmental targets. Upland landscapes might expect to see disproportionate change because of the perception that opportunity costs (e.g. from foregone agricultural activities) are low. However, without considering the preferences of local stakeholders, delivery may be misaligned, underlying conflicts not considered and local actors alienated. Land-use preferences are shaped by the values stakeholders attribute to landscapes, and broader contextual factors, both biophysical (i.e. climate change) or institutional (i.e. land-use policy and financial instruments). This paper explores the relationship between values, contextual factors, and land-use preferences, by applying Participatory Scenario Planning (PSP) to design future land-use visions of local stakeholders in two upland landscapes in England (North Pennines and Dales) and Wales (Elenydd). The paper address two overarching research questions (1) How do different stakeholders value upland landscapes? and (2) How does context shape stakeholders' decisions regarding future land-use? Whilst our results show a greater potential for treescape expansion in the uplands than expected, underlying nuances of land-use preferences demonstrate challenges to treescape expansion here. Our approach also highlights the importance of taking into account contextual factors when examining land-use preferences, for example climate change as a positive driver for on-farm treescape measures, whereas regulatory context limit stakeholders' ambition for change. Only by understanding these complexities through deliberative processes can future treescape expansion at local scales achieve the best outcomes for people and nature.</p>","PeriodicalId":72869,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","volume":"21 1","pages":"2497823"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312000/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and people (Abingdon, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2025.2497823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

UK environmental policy places an increasing emphasis on large-scale land-use change, with tree-planting objectives set to contribute towards meeting legislated climate and environmental targets. Upland landscapes might expect to see disproportionate change because of the perception that opportunity costs (e.g. from foregone agricultural activities) are low. However, without considering the preferences of local stakeholders, delivery may be misaligned, underlying conflicts not considered and local actors alienated. Land-use preferences are shaped by the values stakeholders attribute to landscapes, and broader contextual factors, both biophysical (i.e. climate change) or institutional (i.e. land-use policy and financial instruments). This paper explores the relationship between values, contextual factors, and land-use preferences, by applying Participatory Scenario Planning (PSP) to design future land-use visions of local stakeholders in two upland landscapes in England (North Pennines and Dales) and Wales (Elenydd). The paper address two overarching research questions (1) How do different stakeholders value upland landscapes? and (2) How does context shape stakeholders' decisions regarding future land-use? Whilst our results show a greater potential for treescape expansion in the uplands than expected, underlying nuances of land-use preferences demonstrate challenges to treescape expansion here. Our approach also highlights the importance of taking into account contextual factors when examining land-use preferences, for example climate change as a positive driver for on-farm treescape measures, whereas regulatory context limit stakeholders' ambition for change. Only by understanding these complexities through deliberative processes can future treescape expansion at local scales achieve the best outcomes for people and nature.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

展望高地景观中的未来树篱:利用审议过程了解当地利益相关者的价值和土地使用偏好。
英国的环境政策越来越强调大规模的土地利用变化,植树目标的设定有助于实现立法的气候和环境目标。高地景观可能会出现不成比例的变化,因为人们认为机会成本(例如放弃的农业活动)很低。然而,如果不考虑当地利益相关者的偏好,交付可能会不一致,潜在的冲突没有得到考虑,当地行为者也会被疏远。土地利用偏好由利益相关者赋予景观的价值和更广泛的背景因素(生物物理因素(如气候变化)或制度因素(如土地利用政策和金融工具)所决定。本文通过应用参与式情景规划(PSP)来设计英格兰(北宾宁山脉和山谷)和威尔士(Elenydd)两个高地景观的当地利益相关者的未来土地利用愿景,探讨了价值、背景因素和土地利用偏好之间的关系。本文解决了两个主要的研究问题:(1)不同的利益相关者如何评估高地景观?(2)环境如何影响利益相关者对未来土地利用的决策?虽然我们的研究结果表明,高地的树木逃逸扩展潜力比预期的要大,但土地利用偏好的潜在细微差别表明,这里的树木逃逸扩展面临挑战。我们的方法还强调了在检查土地使用偏好时考虑环境因素的重要性,例如气候变化是农场树木逃脱措施的积极驱动因素,而监管环境限制了利益相关者的变革雄心。只有通过深思熟虑的过程理解这些复杂性,未来在地方尺度上的树木逃逸扩张才能为人类和自然带来最好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信