Quality review of typical value ranges in urodynamic measurements using statistical process control: A single-center retrospective study.

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2025-03-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2024.0073
Xiao Zeng, Hong Shen, Tao Jin, Deyi Luo
{"title":"Quality review of typical value ranges in urodynamic measurements using statistical process control: A single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Xiao Zeng, Hong Shen, Tao Jin, Deyi Luo","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2024.0073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Urodynamic study (UDS) is essential for assessing lower urinary tract function, but quality control methods remain limited. Statistical process control (SPC), a tool originally developed in manufacturing, has shown promise in healthcare for improving quality and reducing variability.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study explored the application of SPC to analyze the typical value ranges (TVR) of urodynamic measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 84 urodynamic traces that met all inclusion criteria were included for analysis. We recorded the TVR for initial intravesical pressure (P<sub>ves</sub>), initial abdominal pressure (P<sub>abd</sub>), and initial detrusor pressure (P<sub>det</sub>) from each enrolled UDS trace. These data were then compared with the standard TVR. In addition, we used the X-bar and S control charts of SPC for process performance analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 20 females and 64 males, with an average age of 58.02 ± 16.09 years. Of the participants, 32 were diagnosed with neurogenic bladder dysfunction, and 52 were diagnosed with non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction. The average TVR for initial P<sub>ves</sub> was 34.81 ± 10.78 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, P<sub>abd</sub> 30.92 ± 11.14 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and P<sub>det</sub> 4.20 ± 3.73 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. We further analyzed the data using scatter plots. In the X-bar control chart, the control limit (CL) was 22.48, the upper CL (UCL) was 32.04, and the lower CL (LCL) was 12.92. In the S control chart, the CL was 15.78, the UCL was 22.57, and the LCL was 8.9. Two cases exceeded the UCL in the X-bar control chart, and one case exceeded the UCL in the S control chart.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clinical value of SPC in the quality review of UDS has been confirmed in previous studies. In this study, we preliminarily verified the use of SPC for continuous variable data, such as the TVR of UDS parameters. The results of this study need to be further validated in a larger sample size, multi-center, and prospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":"12 2","pages":"e21200040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2024.0073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Urodynamic study (UDS) is essential for assessing lower urinary tract function, but quality control methods remain limited. Statistical process control (SPC), a tool originally developed in manufacturing, has shown promise in healthcare for improving quality and reducing variability.

Objective: This study explored the application of SPC to analyze the typical value ranges (TVR) of urodynamic measurements.

Methods: A total of 84 urodynamic traces that met all inclusion criteria were included for analysis. We recorded the TVR for initial intravesical pressure (Pves), initial abdominal pressure (Pabd), and initial detrusor pressure (Pdet) from each enrolled UDS trace. These data were then compared with the standard TVR. In addition, we used the X-bar and S control charts of SPC for process performance analysis.

Results: The study included 20 females and 64 males, with an average age of 58.02 ± 16.09 years. Of the participants, 32 were diagnosed with neurogenic bladder dysfunction, and 52 were diagnosed with non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction. The average TVR for initial Pves was 34.81 ± 10.78 cmH2O, Pabd 30.92 ± 11.14 cmH2O, and Pdet 4.20 ± 3.73 cmH2O. We further analyzed the data using scatter plots. In the X-bar control chart, the control limit (CL) was 22.48, the upper CL (UCL) was 32.04, and the lower CL (LCL) was 12.92. In the S control chart, the CL was 15.78, the UCL was 22.57, and the LCL was 8.9. Two cases exceeded the UCL in the X-bar control chart, and one case exceeded the UCL in the S control chart.

Conclusion: The clinical value of SPC in the quality review of UDS has been confirmed in previous studies. In this study, we preliminarily verified the use of SPC for continuous variable data, such as the TVR of UDS parameters. The results of this study need to be further validated in a larger sample size, multi-center, and prospective study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

采用统计过程控制的尿动力学测量典型值范围的质量评价:一项单中心回顾性研究。
背景:尿动力学研究(UDS)对评估下尿路功能至关重要,但质量控制方法仍然有限。统计过程控制(SPC)是一种最初在制造业中开发的工具,在医疗保健领域显示出提高质量和减少可变性的前景。目的:探讨SPC在尿动力学测量典型值范围(TVR)分析中的应用。方法:共84例符合所有纳入标准的尿动力学痕迹进行分析。我们记录了TVR的初始膀胱压力(Pves),初始腹部压力(Pabd)和初始逼尿肌压力(Pdet)从每个登记的UDS追踪。然后将这些数据与标准TVR进行比较。此外,我们还使用了SPC的X-bar和S控制图进行过程性能分析。结果:女性20例,男性64例,平均年龄58.02±16.09岁。在参与者中,32人被诊断为神经源性膀胱功能障碍,52人被诊断为非神经源性膀胱功能障碍。初始Pves的平均TVR为34.81±10.78 cmH2O, Pabd为30.92±11.14 cmH2O, Pdet为4.20±3.73 cmH2O。我们使用散点图进一步分析数据。在x柱状控制图中,控制极限(CL)为22.48,上限(UCL)为32.04,下限(LCL)为12.92。在S控制图中,CL为15.78,UCL为22.57,LCL为8.9。2例在x柱控制图中超过UCL, 1例在S柱控制图中超过UCL。结论:SPC在UDS质量评价中的临床价值已得到前期研究的证实。在本研究中,我们初步验证了SPC对连续变量数据的使用,例如UDS参数的TVR。本研究结果需要在更大样本量、多中心、前瞻性研究中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信