Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), Andrew Jenkinson (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Steven Key (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager), Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)
{"title":"Craniofacial defect rehabilitation: long-term outcomes of implant-retained ear, nasal, and orbital prostheses – the Morriston experience","authors":"Ioan Davies (Speciality Registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery), Andrew Jenkinson (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Steven Key (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), Peter Llewelyn Evans (Maxillofacial Laboratory Services Manager), Ketan Shah (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon), M.A. Kittur (Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon)","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This retrospective study assessed the long-term outcomes of extraoral craniofacial implants used to support auricular, nasal, and orbital prosthesis in 138 patients treated at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, from 2004 to 2024. A total of 346 implants were reviewed, showing an overall implant survival rate of 91.9% and prosthesis survival rate of 89.6%. Long-term survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were highest for ear implants (100%, 90%, and 80%), respectively, followed by nasal (95.2%, 91.8%, and 91.8%) and orbital implants (89%, 86.6%, and 77%), respectively. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer implant survival, with a survival rate of 89.3% in irradiated implants compared with 97% in non-irradiated implants (p = 0.0219). Amongst the irradiated implants, those placed during ablative surgery showed a significantly improved survival rate (92.49%) than those placed following radiotherapy (68.42%, p = 0.0069). Emerging plating systems such as Epitek show promise in providing alternative nasal prosthesis retention but require further long-term follow up. The above findings underscore the necessity for careful planning alongside experienced lab technicians to optimise implant placement and enhance the long-term success of craniofacial prosthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"63 8","pages":"Pages 589-595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435625001445","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This retrospective study assessed the long-term outcomes of extraoral craniofacial implants used to support auricular, nasal, and orbital prosthesis in 138 patients treated at Morriston Hospital, Swansea, from 2004 to 2024. A total of 346 implants were reviewed, showing an overall implant survival rate of 91.9% and prosthesis survival rate of 89.6%. Long-term survival rates at 5, 10, and 20 years were highest for ear implants (100%, 90%, and 80%), respectively, followed by nasal (95.2%, 91.8%, and 91.8%) and orbital implants (89%, 86.6%, and 77%), respectively. Radiotherapy was associated with poorer implant survival, with a survival rate of 89.3% in irradiated implants compared with 97% in non-irradiated implants (p = 0.0219). Amongst the irradiated implants, those placed during ablative surgery showed a significantly improved survival rate (92.49%) than those placed following radiotherapy (68.42%, p = 0.0069). Emerging plating systems such as Epitek show promise in providing alternative nasal prosthesis retention but require further long-term follow up. The above findings underscore the necessity for careful planning alongside experienced lab technicians to optimise implant placement and enhance the long-term success of craniofacial prosthesis.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons:
• Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region
• One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field
• Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.