Minimally invasive and ablative therapies for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a narrative review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Tim Szilagyi Gemesi, Deirdre Lum, Diana Atashroo, Lisa Chao
{"title":"Minimally invasive and ablative therapies for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a narrative review.","authors":"Tim Szilagyi Gemesi, Deirdre Lum, Diana Atashroo, Lisa Chao","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Uterine fibroids are benign smooth muscle growths that can cause abnormal uterine bleeding, bulk symptoms, and infertility. Traditional treatments include medical therapy and surgical interventions such as hysterectomy and myomectomy. In the past three decades, minimally invasive, uterus-sparing alternatives - namely, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), uterine artery embolization (UAE), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) - have revolutionized the management of symptomatic fibroids. Although early studies suggest these modalities are effective, high-quality data on their long-term efficacy, safety profiles, and reproductive outcomes are limited.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This paper presents a literature review on HIFU, UAE, and RFA for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Studies report improvements in symptom severity and quality of life, with low complication rates. Optimal outcomes depend on careful patient selection, as certain factors increase the risk of treatment failure and the need for reintervention. Furthermore, little is known about pregnancy outcomes following these interventions, as studies are sparse and heterogenous.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>HIFU, UAE, and RFA are safe and effective options for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term effectiveness, fertility and pregnancy outcomes, and comparisons between treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"346-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Uterine fibroids are benign smooth muscle growths that can cause abnormal uterine bleeding, bulk symptoms, and infertility. Traditional treatments include medical therapy and surgical interventions such as hysterectomy and myomectomy. In the past three decades, minimally invasive, uterus-sparing alternatives - namely, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), uterine artery embolization (UAE), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) - have revolutionized the management of symptomatic fibroids. Although early studies suggest these modalities are effective, high-quality data on their long-term efficacy, safety profiles, and reproductive outcomes are limited.

Recent findings: This paper presents a literature review on HIFU, UAE, and RFA for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Studies report improvements in symptom severity and quality of life, with low complication rates. Optimal outcomes depend on careful patient selection, as certain factors increase the risk of treatment failure and the need for reintervention. Furthermore, little is known about pregnancy outcomes following these interventions, as studies are sparse and heterogenous.

Summary: HIFU, UAE, and RFA are safe and effective options for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term effectiveness, fertility and pregnancy outcomes, and comparisons between treatment modalities.

微创和消融治疗症状性子宫肌瘤:叙述回顾。
综述目的:子宫肌瘤是良性平滑肌增生,可引起子宫异常出血、肿块症状和不孕。传统的治疗方法包括药物治疗和手术干预,如子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术。在过去的三十年中,微创,保留子宫的替代方法-即高强度聚焦超声(HIFU),子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)和射频消融(RFA) -已经彻底改变了症状性肌瘤的治疗。尽管早期研究表明这些方式是有效的,但关于其长期疗效、安全性和生殖结果的高质量数据有限。最近发现:本文对HIFU、UAE和RFA治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的文献进行了综述。研究报告了症状严重程度和生活质量的改善,并发症发生率低。最佳结果取决于仔细的患者选择,因为某些因素会增加治疗失败的风险和再次干预的需要。此外,对这些干预措施后的妊娠结局知之甚少,因为研究是稀疏和异质性的。总结:HIFU, UAE和RFA是治疗症状性子宫肌瘤的安全有效的选择。需要进一步的研究来评估长期有效性、生育能力和妊娠结局,以及治疗方式之间的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信