Estimating Nurse Workload Using a Predictive Model From Routine Hospital Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Paul Meredith, Christina Saville, Chiara Dall'Ora, Tom Weeks, Sue Wierzbicki, Peter Griffiths
{"title":"Estimating Nurse Workload Using a Predictive Model From Routine Hospital Data: Algorithm Development and Validation.","authors":"Paul Meredith, Christina Saville, Chiara Dall'Ora, Tom Weeks, Sue Wierzbicki, Peter Griffiths","doi":"10.2196/71666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Managing nurse staffing is complex due to fluctuating demand based on ward occupancy, patient acuity, and dependency. Monitoring staffing adequacy in real time has the potential to inform safe and efficient deployment of staff. Patient classification systems (PCSs) are being used for per shift workload measurement, but they add a frequent administrative task for ward nursing staff.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to explore whether an algorithm could estimate ward workload using existing routinely recorded data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anonymized admission records and assessments from a PCS supporting the safer nursing care tool were used to determine nursing care demand in medical and surgical wards in a single UK hospital between February 2017 and February 2020. Records were linked by ward and time. The data were split into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%). We built a predictive model of ward workload (as measured by the PCS) using routinely recorded administrative data and admission National Early Warning Score. The outcome variable was ward workload derived from the patient classifications, measured as the number of whole-time equivalent (WTE) nursing staff per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a test set of 11,592 ward assessments from 42 wards with a mean WTE per patient of 1.64, the model's mean absolute error was 0.078, with a mean percentage error of 4.9%. A Bland-Altman plot of the differences between the predicted values and the assessment values showed 95% of them within 0.21 WTE per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictions of nursing workload from a relatively small number of routinely collected variables showed moderate accuracy for general wards in 1 English hospital. This demonstrates the potential for automating assessments of nurse staffing requirements from routine data, reducing time spent on this nonclinical overhead, and improving monitoring of real-time staffing pressures.</p>","PeriodicalId":56334,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Informatics","volume":"13 ","pages":"e71666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/71666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Managing nurse staffing is complex due to fluctuating demand based on ward occupancy, patient acuity, and dependency. Monitoring staffing adequacy in real time has the potential to inform safe and efficient deployment of staff. Patient classification systems (PCSs) are being used for per shift workload measurement, but they add a frequent administrative task for ward nursing staff.

Objective: The objective of this study is to explore whether an algorithm could estimate ward workload using existing routinely recorded data.

Methods: Anonymized admission records and assessments from a PCS supporting the safer nursing care tool were used to determine nursing care demand in medical and surgical wards in a single UK hospital between February 2017 and February 2020. Records were linked by ward and time. The data were split into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%). We built a predictive model of ward workload (as measured by the PCS) using routinely recorded administrative data and admission National Early Warning Score. The outcome variable was ward workload derived from the patient classifications, measured as the number of whole-time equivalent (WTE) nursing staff per patient.

Results: In a test set of 11,592 ward assessments from 42 wards with a mean WTE per patient of 1.64, the model's mean absolute error was 0.078, with a mean percentage error of 4.9%. A Bland-Altman plot of the differences between the predicted values and the assessment values showed 95% of them within 0.21 WTE per patient.

Conclusions: Predictions of nursing workload from a relatively small number of routinely collected variables showed moderate accuracy for general wards in 1 English hospital. This demonstrates the potential for automating assessments of nurse staffing requirements from routine data, reducing time spent on this nonclinical overhead, and improving monitoring of real-time staffing pressures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用常规医院数据预测模型估计护士工作量:算法开发和验证。
背景:由于病房占用率、患者敏锐度和依赖性的波动需求,管理护士人员是复杂的。实时监测人员配备是否充足,有可能为安全有效地部署工作人员提供信息。患者分类系统(PCSs)被用于每班工作量测量,但它们增加了病房护理人员的频繁管理任务。目的:本研究的目的是探讨一种算法是否可以利用现有的常规记录数据来估计病房工作量。方法:使用匿名住院记录和支持更安全护理工具的PCS评估来确定2017年2月至2020年2月期间英国一家医院内科和外科病房的护理需求。记录是按病房和时间联系起来的。数据被分成训练集(75%)和测试集(25%)。我们使用常规记录的行政数据和入院国家预警评分建立了病房工作量的预测模型(由PCS测量)。结果变量是来自患者分类的病房工作量,以每位患者的全职等效(WTE)护理人员的数量来衡量。结果:在来自42个病房的11,592个病房评估的测试集中,平均每位患者WTE为1.64,该模型的平均绝对误差为0.078,平均百分比误差为4.9%。预测值与评估值之间的Bland-Altman图显示95%的差异在每例患者0.21 WTE以内。结论:从相对较少的常规收集变量中预测护理工作量对一家英国医院的普通病房显示中等准确性。这证明了根据常规数据自动评估护士人员配备需求的潜力,减少了在这种非临床开销上花费的时间,并改进了对实时人员配备压力的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Informatics
JMIR Medical Informatics Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
173
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR Medical Informatics (JMI, ISSN 2291-9694) is a top-rated, tier A journal which focuses on clinical informatics, big data in health and health care, decision support for health professionals, electronic health records, ehealth infrastructures and implementation. It has a focus on applied, translational research, with a broad readership including clinicians, CIOs, engineers, industry and health informatics professionals. Published by JMIR Publications, publisher of the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), the leading eHealth/mHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175), JMIR Med Inform has a slightly different scope (emphasizing more on applications for clinicians and health professionals rather than consumers/citizens, which is the focus of JMIR), publishes even faster, and also allows papers which are more technical or more formative than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信