Emotion regulation and high social anxiety: spontaneous and instructed use of cognitive reappraisal to regulate anger.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Virginia Tsekova, Avideh Gharehgazlou, Naomi Koerner, Martin M Antony
{"title":"Emotion regulation and high social anxiety: spontaneous and instructed use of cognitive reappraisal to regulate anger.","authors":"Virginia Tsekova, Avideh Gharehgazlou, Naomi Koerner, Martin M Antony","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2025.2539985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Individuals with Social Anxiety Disorder and those high in social anxiety (HSA) experience greater anger difficulties compared to those with low social anxiety (LSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined trait and state anger in individuals with HSA (<i>n </i>= 46) and LSA (<i>n </i>= 45). The study also explored group differences in state and trait cognitive reappraisal and the effectiveness of instructed cognitive reappraisal to regulate state anger among participants with HSA and LSA in response to films containing rejection-salient content.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants with HSA, relative to LSA, exhibited greater trait and state anger. The HSA group reported lower trait cognitive reappraisal than the LSA group. However, results revealed no significant group differences in state cognitive reappraisal. Further, both groups exhibited a significant reduction in state anger after receiving instructions to use cognitive reappraisal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings demonstrate that when instructed to use cognitive reappraisal, individuals with HSA were able to do so effectively, and experienced a comparable magnitude in the reduction of state anger as participants with LSA. Implication of these findings are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2025.2539985","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Individuals with Social Anxiety Disorder and those high in social anxiety (HSA) experience greater anger difficulties compared to those with low social anxiety (LSA).

Methods: This study examined trait and state anger in individuals with HSA (n = 46) and LSA (n = 45). The study also explored group differences in state and trait cognitive reappraisal and the effectiveness of instructed cognitive reappraisal to regulate state anger among participants with HSA and LSA in response to films containing rejection-salient content.

Results: Participants with HSA, relative to LSA, exhibited greater trait and state anger. The HSA group reported lower trait cognitive reappraisal than the LSA group. However, results revealed no significant group differences in state cognitive reappraisal. Further, both groups exhibited a significant reduction in state anger after receiving instructions to use cognitive reappraisal.

Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that when instructed to use cognitive reappraisal, individuals with HSA were able to do so effectively, and experienced a comparable magnitude in the reduction of state anger as participants with LSA. Implication of these findings are discussed.

情绪调节和高度社交焦虑:自发和有指导地使用认知重评来调节愤怒。
背景与目的:社交焦虑障碍和高社交焦虑(HSA)个体比低社交焦虑(LSA)个体有更大的愤怒困难。方法:本研究对HSA患者(n = 46)和LSA患者(n = 45)的特质性和状态性愤怒进行了检测。本研究还探讨了状态认知重评和特质认知重评在HSA和LSA被试对含有排斥突出内容的电影的反应中的组间差异,以及指导性认知重评对状态愤怒的调节效果。结果:与LSA相比,HSA参与者表现出更大的特质性和状态性愤怒。HSA组的特质认知重评价低于LSA组。然而,结果显示状态认知重评在组间无显著差异。此外,在接受使用认知重新评估的指示后,两组都表现出状态愤怒的显著减少。结论:这些发现表明,当指示使用认知重评时,HSA个体能够有效地做到这一点,并且在状态愤怒的减少程度上与LSA参与者相当。讨论了这些发现的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信