Negotiated Affordances: The Digital Sexual Safety among Gay Men on Geo-Social Apps in Taiwan.

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Yiren Lin
{"title":"Negotiated Affordances: The Digital Sexual Safety among Gay Men on Geo-Social Apps in Taiwan.","authors":"Yiren Lin","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2025.2533278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite growing discussions on digitally mediated safer sex practices, little research has examined how gay men negotiate safety and perform identity through geo-social applications (apps) in non-Western contexts. This article integrates the materiality of digital technologies with the subjectivity of users to explore how gay men navigate their sexual safety on social apps. Bridging the concept of affordance with user agency, this article proposes a framework of <i>negotiated affordances</i> to contemplate how gay men situate their sense of safety and leverage the affordances of social apps in the post-AIDS era within the sociocultural context of Taiwan. Drawing on interviews and participant observation on Grindr and Hornet, I identify relational, textual, and temporal affordances as three interrelated modalities through which user-technology interactions unfold on social apps. This article describes how \"safer sex\" is socialized, communicated, or differentiated through the sociality, textuality, and temporality woven into sexual negotiations in digital contexts. The findings demonstrate how gay men repurpose the affordances of social apps to navigate potential risks in virtual environments and call for culturally tailored digital health interventions that recognize the everyday strategies they deploy to arrange intimacy, manage digital risk, and construct sexual safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2533278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite growing discussions on digitally mediated safer sex practices, little research has examined how gay men negotiate safety and perform identity through geo-social applications (apps) in non-Western contexts. This article integrates the materiality of digital technologies with the subjectivity of users to explore how gay men navigate their sexual safety on social apps. Bridging the concept of affordance with user agency, this article proposes a framework of negotiated affordances to contemplate how gay men situate their sense of safety and leverage the affordances of social apps in the post-AIDS era within the sociocultural context of Taiwan. Drawing on interviews and participant observation on Grindr and Hornet, I identify relational, textual, and temporal affordances as three interrelated modalities through which user-technology interactions unfold on social apps. This article describes how "safer sex" is socialized, communicated, or differentiated through the sociality, textuality, and temporality woven into sexual negotiations in digital contexts. The findings demonstrate how gay men repurpose the affordances of social apps to navigate potential risks in virtual environments and call for culturally tailored digital health interventions that recognize the everyday strategies they deploy to arrange intimacy, manage digital risk, and construct sexual safety.

协商允诺:台湾地理社交应用中男同志的数位性安全。
尽管关于数字媒介安全性行为的讨论越来越多,但很少有研究调查男同性恋者如何在非西方环境下通过地理社交应用程序(app)来协商安全问题和表现身份。本文将数字技术的物质性与用户的主观性结合起来,探讨男同性恋者如何在社交应用程序上处理性安全问题。本文结合使用者代理与允诺性的概念,提出一个协商允诺性的框架,来思考台湾社会文化背景下的后艾滋病时代,男同志如何定位他们的安全感并利用社交应用的允诺性。通过对Grindr和Hornet的访谈和参与者观察,我确定了关系、文本和时间支持是社交应用中用户技术交互展开的三种相互关联的模式。这篇文章描述了“安全性行为”是如何通过社交性、文本性和时间性在数字环境下的性谈判中被社会化、沟通或区分的。研究结果表明,男同性恋者如何重新利用社交应用程序的功能,以应对虚拟环境中的潜在风险,并呼吁针对文化量身定制的数字健康干预措施,以识别他们为安排亲密关系、管理数字风险和构建性安全而部署的日常策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信