Evolution of an Electronic Health Record-Based Alert to Optimize Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1055/a-2672-8358
Mikhail Y Akbashev, Alyssa Utz, Phillip Anjum, Stacey Watkins, Michael Mattaliano, Palak Patel, Debbie Vigliotti, Mara L Schenker, Bhavin B Adhyaru
{"title":"Evolution of an Electronic Health Record-Based Alert to Optimize Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.","authors":"Mikhail Y Akbashev, Alyssa Utz, Phillip Anjum, Stacey Watkins, Michael Mattaliano, Palak Patel, Debbie Vigliotti, Mara L Schenker, Bhavin B Adhyaru","doi":"10.1055/a-2672-8358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, <i>p</i> < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, <i>p</i> < 0.01).This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"1060-1066"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12425610/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2672-8358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in hospitalized patients must balance risks of bleeding and thrombosis. Clinical changes such as bleeding or renal injury can also trigger changes or delays in thromboprophylaxis. Electronic health record alerts (EHRAs) can allow for targeted notification to providers to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and improve patient outcomes at the risk of alert fatigue if not carefully designed and implemented.This study aimed to develop and refine an EHRA that minimizes nuisance alerts while facilitating appropriate ordering of VTE prophylaxis for medical patients.A multidisciplinary group at a single large safety-net academic medical center developed an EHRA to identify patients at increased thrombosis risk, but without orders for VTE prophylaxis. This was refined over four phases: development and validation, initial monitoring and exclusion criteria adjustment, COVID-19-related modifications, and delayed surveillance and modification. Data analysis evaluated criteria including alert frequency, alert action/utilization, and alert duration.The EHRA fired an average of 33.3 times per day across all phases of the study. Phase 1 of EHRA implementation showed significantly increased alerts per patient (6.4 to 43.3 alerts per day, p < 0.01) as well as the percentage of patients with >5 alerts (2.8 to 60.0%, p < 0.01). Modifications in phase 2 and phase 3 increased alert rates without any significant effect on subsequent action taken by a provider. Phase 4 modifications led to a significant reduction in alert frequency (44.1 to 14.9 alerts per day, p < 0.01) coupled with a notable increase in provider action (0.24 to 7.73%, p < 0.01).This multidisciplinary, provider-centered, intervention improved alert appearance, and information needed to guide providers increased provider engagement 32-fold, with a 3-fold decrease in alert frequency. Despite improvements, ongoing monitoring and maintenance of this alert is important.

关于CDS失败的专题:基于电子健康记录的警报的演变,以优化静脉血栓栓塞预防。
背景:住院患者静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)预防必须平衡出血和血栓形成的风险。临床变化如出血或肾损伤也可引起血栓预防的改变或延迟。如果不仔细设计和实施,电子健康记录警报(EHRAs)可以允许有针对性地通知提供者,以改善静脉血栓栓塞的预防,并在警惕疲劳的风险下改善患者的预后。目的:开发和完善EHRA,最大限度地减少滋扰警报,同时促进适当订购静脉血栓栓塞预防医疗患者。方法:一个大型安全网学术医疗中心的多学科小组开发了EHRA,以识别血栓形成风险增加的患者,但没有静脉血栓栓塞预防的命令。经过四个阶段的完善:开发和验证、初始监测和排除标准调整、与covid -19相关的修改以及延迟监测和修改。数据分析评估标准包括警报频率、警报动作/利用率和警报持续时间。结果:在研究的所有阶段,EHRA平均每天发射33.3次。实施EHRA的第一阶段显著提高了每位患者的警报(每天6.4到43.3个警报,5个警报(2.8%到60.0%)。结论:这种多学科、以提供者为中心的干预改善了警报外观,指导提供者所需的信息使提供者参与度提高了32倍,警报频率降低了3倍。尽管有所改进,但对这一警报的持续监测和维护很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信