Differences in demographics and clinical outcomes in older, middle-aged, and younger adults with low back pain receiving chiropractic care.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
L A Hansen, J Hartvigsen, R K Jensen
{"title":"Differences in demographics and clinical outcomes in older, middle-aged, and younger adults with low back pain receiving chiropractic care.","authors":"L A Hansen, J Hartvigsen, R K Jensen","doi":"10.1186/s12998-025-00589-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The evidence on age-related differences in outcomes in patients seeking chiropractic care for low back pain is limited. The aims of this study were to (i) to explore differences in patient characteristics and symptoms between older, middle-aged and younger patients with LBP seeking chiropractic care, (ii) to investigate whether age was associated with changes in physical function at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up and (iii) to evaluate if other specific demographic variables were associated with changes in physical function over time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cohort study (November 2016 to December 2018) used data from the Danish Chiropractic Low Back Pain Cohort (ChiCo). Participants ≥ 18 years seeking chiropractic care for new onset low back pain were categorised into three age groups: young adults (< 40 years), middle-aged adults (40-59 years), and older adults (≥ 60 years). Disability was assessed at baseline and at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Associations between age groups and disability outcomes were analysed using linear regression, while associations with demographics, and social and psychological factors were examined using backward stepwise linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2777 participants were included. At baseline, there were no significant differences in disability scores between age groups. Older patients reported more non-musculoskeletal comorbidities and prescription pain medication use, compared to younger and middle-aged patients. Younger patients showed higher depression and anxiety levels compared to middle-aged and older patients. Younger and middle-aged patients more frequently reported multiple musculoskeletal comorbidities than older patients. At all follow-ups, older patients had slightly higher disability scores and showed less improvement over time compared to younger and middle-aged patients, indicating a modest association between age and poorer outcomes. Higher baseline disability, more musculoskeletal comorbidities, worse self-reported health, and higher depression scores were more consistently associated with less improvement in disability over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older chiropractic patients with low back pain had slightly higher disability scores compared to younger and middle-aged patients, but age was not the strongest factor associated with disability outcomes. Baseline disability, depression, self-perceived general health, and MSK comorbidities were more consistently linked to higher disability scores across all follow-up time points.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"33 1","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315371/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-025-00589-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evidence on age-related differences in outcomes in patients seeking chiropractic care for low back pain is limited. The aims of this study were to (i) to explore differences in patient characteristics and symptoms between older, middle-aged and younger patients with LBP seeking chiropractic care, (ii) to investigate whether age was associated with changes in physical function at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up and (iii) to evaluate if other specific demographic variables were associated with changes in physical function over time.

Methods: This observational cohort study (November 2016 to December 2018) used data from the Danish Chiropractic Low Back Pain Cohort (ChiCo). Participants ≥ 18 years seeking chiropractic care for new onset low back pain were categorised into three age groups: young adults (< 40 years), middle-aged adults (40-59 years), and older adults (≥ 60 years). Disability was assessed at baseline and at 2, 13 and 52 weeks follow-up using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Associations between age groups and disability outcomes were analysed using linear regression, while associations with demographics, and social and psychological factors were examined using backward stepwise linear regression.

Results: 2777 participants were included. At baseline, there were no significant differences in disability scores between age groups. Older patients reported more non-musculoskeletal comorbidities and prescription pain medication use, compared to younger and middle-aged patients. Younger patients showed higher depression and anxiety levels compared to middle-aged and older patients. Younger and middle-aged patients more frequently reported multiple musculoskeletal comorbidities than older patients. At all follow-ups, older patients had slightly higher disability scores and showed less improvement over time compared to younger and middle-aged patients, indicating a modest association between age and poorer outcomes. Higher baseline disability, more musculoskeletal comorbidities, worse self-reported health, and higher depression scores were more consistently associated with less improvement in disability over time.

Conclusion: Older chiropractic patients with low back pain had slightly higher disability scores compared to younger and middle-aged patients, but age was not the strongest factor associated with disability outcomes. Baseline disability, depression, self-perceived general health, and MSK comorbidities were more consistently linked to higher disability scores across all follow-up time points.

Abstract Image

老年、中年和年轻腰痛患者接受捏脊治疗的人口统计学差异和临床结果。
背景:寻求脊骨按摩治疗腰痛患者的结果与年龄相关差异的证据是有限的。本研究的目的是:(i)探索寻求脊椎指压治疗的老年、中年和年轻腰痛患者的特征和症状差异,(ii)调查年龄是否与随访2周、13周和52周时身体功能的变化有关,(iii)评估其他特定的人口统计学变量是否与身体功能随时间的变化有关。方法:这项观察性队列研究(2016年11月至2018年12月)使用了丹麦脊椎按摩下腰痛队列(ChiCo)的数据。≥18岁的参与者因新发腰痛寻求脊椎指压治疗,被分为三个年龄组:年轻人(结果:包括2777名参与者)。在基线时,各年龄组之间的残疾评分没有显著差异。与年轻和中年患者相比,老年患者报告了更多的非肌肉骨骼合并症和处方止痛药的使用。与中老年患者相比,年轻患者表现出更高的抑郁和焦虑水平。年轻和中年患者比老年患者更常报告多发性肌肉骨骼合并症。在所有的随访中,老年患者的残疾评分略高,与年轻和中年患者相比,随着时间的推移,老年患者的改善程度较低,这表明年龄与较差的预后之间存在一定的关联。随着时间的推移,更高的基线残疾、更多的肌肉骨骼合并症、更差的自我报告健康状况和更高的抑郁评分更一致地与残疾改善程度较低相关。结论:老年腰痛整脊患者的失能评分略高于年轻和中年患者,但年龄不是与失能结果相关的最强因素。在所有随访时间点上,基线残疾、抑郁、自我感知的一般健康状况和MSK合并症与较高的残疾得分更为一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信