The family stress model during the coronavirus-19 pandemic: Identifying parental resilience factors.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Casey E Pearce, Elizabeth J Kiel
{"title":"The family stress model during the coronavirus-19 pandemic: Identifying parental resilience factors.","authors":"Casey E Pearce, Elizabeth J Kiel","doi":"10.1037/fam0001387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The family stress model provides a theoretical framework for understanding relations among economic hardship, parental distress, family relationships and behavior, and child outcomes. The present study aimed to replicate its paths with predictors and mechanisms studied before and over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and child problematic coping as the outcome. We also examined how sources of family resilience related directly to or moderated relations among family stress model variables. Participants included 170 families of predominantly non-Hispanic White background with varying socioeconomic circumstances. Assessments occurred across early childhood (age 2-4 years, prepandemic) and at two points during the pandemic (child mean ages = 7.32 and 7.80 years, respectively). Mothers completed laboratory observation (maternal warmth) and surveys prior to (income-to-needs, social support) and during (economic stress, maternal distress, negative parenting, child coping) the pandemic. Unexpectedly, higher prepandemic income-to-needs predicted greater maternal distress early in the pandemic. Prepandemic social support (inversely) and early pandemic maternal distress (positively) are related to early pandemic negative parenting. Prepandemic income-to-needs predicted early pandemic negative parenting indirectly through early pandemic maternal distress. When mothers reported a high number of positive changes during the pandemic, negative parenting predicted child involuntary engagement coping midpandemic. Social support predicted lower child involuntary engagement coping through lower negative parenting. Results replicated the risk path between parental distress and negative parenting, and extended risk to higher income families. Findings suggest that the family stress model provides a theoretical foundation from which to study risk and resilience processes in families during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12321217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The family stress model provides a theoretical framework for understanding relations among economic hardship, parental distress, family relationships and behavior, and child outcomes. The present study aimed to replicate its paths with predictors and mechanisms studied before and over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and child problematic coping as the outcome. We also examined how sources of family resilience related directly to or moderated relations among family stress model variables. Participants included 170 families of predominantly non-Hispanic White background with varying socioeconomic circumstances. Assessments occurred across early childhood (age 2-4 years, prepandemic) and at two points during the pandemic (child mean ages = 7.32 and 7.80 years, respectively). Mothers completed laboratory observation (maternal warmth) and surveys prior to (income-to-needs, social support) and during (economic stress, maternal distress, negative parenting, child coping) the pandemic. Unexpectedly, higher prepandemic income-to-needs predicted greater maternal distress early in the pandemic. Prepandemic social support (inversely) and early pandemic maternal distress (positively) are related to early pandemic negative parenting. Prepandemic income-to-needs predicted early pandemic negative parenting indirectly through early pandemic maternal distress. When mothers reported a high number of positive changes during the pandemic, negative parenting predicted child involuntary engagement coping midpandemic. Social support predicted lower child involuntary engagement coping through lower negative parenting. Results replicated the risk path between parental distress and negative parenting, and extended risk to higher income families. Findings suggest that the family stress model provides a theoretical foundation from which to study risk and resilience processes in families during the COVID-19 pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

冠状病毒-19大流行期间的家庭压力模型:确定父母的恢复力因素。
家庭压力模型为理解经济困难、父母痛苦、家庭关系和行为与儿童结局之间的关系提供了一个理论框架。本研究旨在通过在COVID-19大流行之前和过程中研究的预测因素和机制来复制其路径,并将儿童问题应对作为结果。我们还研究了家庭弹性的来源如何直接与家庭压力模型变量之间的关系相关或调节关系。参与者包括170个以非西班牙裔白人为主的家庭,他们的社会经济环境各不相同。评估在儿童早期(大流行前2-4岁)和大流行期间的两个时间点进行(儿童平均年龄分别为7.32岁和7.80岁)。母亲们在大流行之前(从收入到需求、社会支持)和期间(经济压力、产妇痛苦、消极养育、儿童应对)完成了实验室观察(产妇温暖)和调查。出乎意料的是,大流行前较高的收入与需求比预示着大流行早期孕产妇的痛苦更大。大流行前的社会支持(负相关)和大流行早期的孕产妇痛苦(正相关)与大流行早期的消极养育有关。大流行前的收入与需求相匹配,通过大流行早期的产妇痛苦间接预测了大流行早期的消极养育。当母亲报告在大流行期间发生了大量积极变化时,消极的养育方式预示着儿童在大流行中期会非自愿地参与应对。社会支持预测通过较低的消极父母方式降低儿童非自愿参与应对。结果重复了父母痛苦和消极养育之间的风险路径,并将风险扩展到高收入家庭。研究结果表明,家庭压力模型为研究COVID-19大流行期间家庭的风险和复原力过程提供了理论基础。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信