Associations between parenting styles and child self-regulation skills: A series of meta-analyses.

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Psychology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1037/fam0001379
Jessica Blume, Gabriella M Garcia, Marianne Garcia, Ann M Mastergeorge
{"title":"Associations between parenting styles and child self-regulation skills: A series of meta-analyses.","authors":"Jessica Blume, Gabriella M Garcia, Marianne Garcia, Ann M Mastergeorge","doi":"10.1037/fam0001379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children's self-regulation skills have important developmental implications for a variety of outcomes, and parenting practices are instrumental in shaping these self-regulatory skills. Given the variations in associations observed across different populations and inconsistencies in measurement methods, we specifically evaluate different dimensions of parenting styles regarding how behaviors promote, suppress, or passively contribute to child independence and development of self-regulation skills. We utilize a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether different types of parenting engagement predict children's self-regulation abilities and evaluate moderation effects attributed to measurement strategies, sample characteristics, study design, and publication source qualities. Random-effects models with the 62 total included studies yielded significant main effects for supportive (<i>k</i> = 42) parenting and suppressive (<i>k</i> = 50) parenting, but not passive (<i>k</i> = 10) parenting. Parenting style reporting method was confirmed to be a significant moderator for supportive parenting, suppressive parenting, and passive parenting. Findings of the present study emphasize the benefits of supportive parenting and the detriments of suppressive parenting in fostering self-regulation skills across childhood and adolescence. While the directionality of these associations was unsurprising, the alignment in magnitude and therefore near-perfectly antagonistic roles for establishing children's independent regulation is a striking new contribution to developmental science. The inclusion of passive parenting did not yield significant main effects for the child self-regulation outcome, but the positive trend observed provides a baseline for future reviews to build upon. Implications for these meta-analyses include tailoring of intervention programs to include responsive parenting practices and strategies to reduce punitive discipline approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"885-898"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children's self-regulation skills have important developmental implications for a variety of outcomes, and parenting practices are instrumental in shaping these self-regulatory skills. Given the variations in associations observed across different populations and inconsistencies in measurement methods, we specifically evaluate different dimensions of parenting styles regarding how behaviors promote, suppress, or passively contribute to child independence and development of self-regulation skills. We utilize a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether different types of parenting engagement predict children's self-regulation abilities and evaluate moderation effects attributed to measurement strategies, sample characteristics, study design, and publication source qualities. Random-effects models with the 62 total included studies yielded significant main effects for supportive (k = 42) parenting and suppressive (k = 50) parenting, but not passive (k = 10) parenting. Parenting style reporting method was confirmed to be a significant moderator for supportive parenting, suppressive parenting, and passive parenting. Findings of the present study emphasize the benefits of supportive parenting and the detriments of suppressive parenting in fostering self-regulation skills across childhood and adolescence. While the directionality of these associations was unsurprising, the alignment in magnitude and therefore near-perfectly antagonistic roles for establishing children's independent regulation is a striking new contribution to developmental science. The inclusion of passive parenting did not yield significant main effects for the child self-regulation outcome, but the positive trend observed provides a baseline for future reviews to build upon. Implications for these meta-analyses include tailoring of intervention programs to include responsive parenting practices and strategies to reduce punitive discipline approaches. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

父母教养方式与儿童自我调节能力之间的关系:一系列元分析。
儿童的自我调节技能对各种结果具有重要的发展意义,父母的做法在塑造这些自我调节技能方面起着重要的作用。鉴于在不同人群中观察到的关联差异和测量方法的不一致性,我们特别评估了父母教养方式的不同维度,即行为如何促进、抑制或被动地促进儿童独立和自我调节技能的发展。本研究采用荟萃分析方法来研究不同类型的父母参与是否能预测儿童的自我调节能力,并评估测量策略、样本特征、研究设计和出版物来源质量的调节效应。共纳入62项研究的随机效应模型显示,支持型(k = 42)和抑制性(k = 50)养育方式有显著的主效应,而被动(k = 10)养育方式没有显著的主效应。父母教养方式报告方法对支持型、压制型和被动型的教养方式有显著调节作用。本研究的结果强调了支持性父母在培养儿童和青少年的自我调节技能方面的好处和抑制性父母的害处。虽然这些关联的方向性并不令人惊讶,但在建立儿童独立调节方面的幅度和因此近乎完美的对抗作用是对发展科学的一个惊人的新贡献。包括被动养育对儿童自我调节结果没有产生显著的主要影响,但观察到的积极趋势为未来的研究提供了基础。这些荟萃分析的含义包括调整干预方案,包括响应性育儿实践和减少惩罚性纪律方法的策略。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信