Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study.

IF 2.7 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2025-07-31 DOI:10.2196/63717
Jessica R Thompson, Keeghan Francis, Caree R McAfee, Madeline Brown, Todd Burus, Melinda Rogers, Connie L Sorrell, Elizabeth Westbrook, Lovoria B Williams, Jennifer Redmond Knight, Elaine Russell, Natalie P Wilhite, Pamela C Hull
{"title":"Capturing Community Perspectives in a Statewide Cancer Needs Assessment: Online Focus Group Study.","authors":"Jessica R Thompson, Keeghan Francis, Caree R McAfee, Madeline Brown, Todd Burus, Melinda Rogers, Connie L Sorrell, Elizabeth Westbrook, Lovoria B Williams, Jennifer Redmond Knight, Elaine Russell, Natalie P Wilhite, Pamela C Hull","doi":"10.2196/63717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kentucky has the highest all-site cancer incidence and mortality rates in the United States. Conducting needs assessments in a large geographic area, such as an entire state, poses challenges in collecting qualitative data from diverse rural and urban contexts. In 2021, a steering committee was formed to drive a multimethod, statewide cancer needs assessment (CNA) to identify the future priorities for all cancer-related care in Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to report on the online focus group component of the CNA by documenting existing community resources and perceived needs across the cancer care continuum. In addition, we aimed to explore the impacts of social determinants of health among populations experiencing health disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through existing partnerships and a national research registry, we recruited adult Kentucky residents who were not employed in health occupations to participate in 11 online 60-minute focus groups, stratified to include multiple target populations and geographic areas. We based our semistructured discussion guide on the cancer care continuum and focused on social determinants of health, health equity, and factors affecting cancer diagnoses and outcomes. We conducted a qualitative line-by-line analysis of the recorded transcripts to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants (N=51; mean 4.63, SD 2.26 per group) lived in 25 different counties, including 35% (18/51) from rural communities, 14% (7/51) from the Appalachian area of Kentucky, and 31% (16/51) who self-identified with a racial or ethnic minority group. We identified 17 primary themes representing community-perceived needs and potential solutions across the cancer care continuum, including novel approaches to make information accessible; messaging not interpreted as blaming or shaming; messaging from individuals who engender trust; screening efforts to reach individuals where they are; ways to address practical barriers to screening and treatment, such as cost and transportation; and ways to increase knowledge about insurance coverage. In addition, we found 83 emergent subthemes specific to race, ethnicity, rural and urban residence, sexual orientation and gender identity, and age. The participants described the need to promote positive, culturally sensitive patient-health care provider communication and to create safe care spaces that consider the ways in which social norms affect cancer care, fight stigma, and improve health equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>By conducting statewide qualitative data collection online, we provided valuable depth of understanding for future programs and research to address cancer incidence and mortality in Kentucky. The findings pointed to several potential actions to address community-perceived needs across the cancer care continuum, including increasing accessible risk reduction information, expanding ways to overcome challenges to screening and treatment, building patient navigation resources, and increasing positive patient-health care provider communication. The findings also suggest that online focus groups can be a valuable component of CNAs to capture cancer-related needs and solutions across large geographic areas and diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":"11 ","pages":"e63717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63717","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Kentucky has the highest all-site cancer incidence and mortality rates in the United States. Conducting needs assessments in a large geographic area, such as an entire state, poses challenges in collecting qualitative data from diverse rural and urban contexts. In 2021, a steering committee was formed to drive a multimethod, statewide cancer needs assessment (CNA) to identify the future priorities for all cancer-related care in Kentucky.

Objective: We aimed to report on the online focus group component of the CNA by documenting existing community resources and perceived needs across the cancer care continuum. In addition, we aimed to explore the impacts of social determinants of health among populations experiencing health disparities.

Methods: Through existing partnerships and a national research registry, we recruited adult Kentucky residents who were not employed in health occupations to participate in 11 online 60-minute focus groups, stratified to include multiple target populations and geographic areas. We based our semistructured discussion guide on the cancer care continuum and focused on social determinants of health, health equity, and factors affecting cancer diagnoses and outcomes. We conducted a qualitative line-by-line analysis of the recorded transcripts to identify themes.

Results: The participants (N=51; mean 4.63, SD 2.26 per group) lived in 25 different counties, including 35% (18/51) from rural communities, 14% (7/51) from the Appalachian area of Kentucky, and 31% (16/51) who self-identified with a racial or ethnic minority group. We identified 17 primary themes representing community-perceived needs and potential solutions across the cancer care continuum, including novel approaches to make information accessible; messaging not interpreted as blaming or shaming; messaging from individuals who engender trust; screening efforts to reach individuals where they are; ways to address practical barriers to screening and treatment, such as cost and transportation; and ways to increase knowledge about insurance coverage. In addition, we found 83 emergent subthemes specific to race, ethnicity, rural and urban residence, sexual orientation and gender identity, and age. The participants described the need to promote positive, culturally sensitive patient-health care provider communication and to create safe care spaces that consider the ways in which social norms affect cancer care, fight stigma, and improve health equity.

Conclusions: By conducting statewide qualitative data collection online, we provided valuable depth of understanding for future programs and research to address cancer incidence and mortality in Kentucky. The findings pointed to several potential actions to address community-perceived needs across the cancer care continuum, including increasing accessible risk reduction information, expanding ways to overcome challenges to screening and treatment, building patient navigation resources, and increasing positive patient-health care provider communication. The findings also suggest that online focus groups can be a valuable component of CNAs to capture cancer-related needs and solutions across large geographic areas and diverse populations.

在全州癌症需求评估中捕捉社区观点:在线焦点小组研究。
背景:肯塔基州是美国全部位癌症发病率和死亡率最高的州。在一个大的地理区域(如整个州)进行需求评估,对从不同的农村和城市环境中收集定性数据提出了挑战。2021年,成立了一个指导委员会,以推动多方法的全州癌症需求评估(CNA),以确定肯塔基州所有癌症相关护理的未来优先事项。目的:我们旨在通过记录现有社区资源和整个癌症护理连续体的感知需求来报告CNA的在线焦点小组组成部分。此外,我们旨在探讨健康的社会决定因素对经历健康差异的人群的影响。方法:通过现有的合作伙伴关系和国家研究登记处,我们招募了肯塔基州未从事卫生职业的成年居民参加11个在线60分钟焦点小组,分层以包括多个目标人群和地理区域。我们将半结构化的讨论指南建立在癌症护理连续体的基础上,重点关注健康的社会决定因素、健康公平以及影响癌症诊断和结果的因素。我们对记录的笔录进行了逐行定性分析,以确定主题。结果:受试者(N=51;平均4.63,每组SD 2.26)生活在25个不同的县,其中35%(18/51)来自农村社区,14%(7/51)来自肯塔基州的阿巴拉契亚地区,31%(16/51)自认为是种族或少数民族群体。我们确定了17个主要主题,代表了整个癌症治疗连续体的社区感知需求和潜在解决方案,包括使信息可访问的新方法;信息不被理解为责备或羞辱;来自产生信任的个人的信息;筛查工作,使个人能够接触到他们所在的地方;如何解决筛查和治疗方面的实际障碍,如费用和运输;以及增加保险知识的方法。此外,我们还发现了83个新兴的子主题,具体涉及种族、民族、农村和城市居住、性取向和性别认同以及年龄。与会者描述了需要促进积极的、文化上敏感的患者与卫生保健提供者之间的沟通,并创造安全的卫生保健空间,考虑到社会规范影响癌症护理的方式,消除污名,改善卫生公平。结论:通过在网上进行全州范围的定性数据收集,我们为未来的项目和研究提供了有价值的深度理解,以解决肯塔基州的癌症发病率和死亡率。研究结果指出了几个潜在的行动,以解决整个癌症护理连续体中社区感知的需求,包括增加可获得的降低风险信息,扩大克服筛查和治疗挑战的方法,建立患者导航资源,以及增加积极的患者与医疗保健提供者的沟通。研究结果还表明,在线焦点小组可以成为CNAs的一个有价值的组成部分,以捕捉大地理区域和不同人群的癌症相关需求和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信