{"title":"Bodies sensing air pollution in asthma research.","authors":"Emma Garnett","doi":"10.1080/09505431.2025.2491342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Air pollution knowledge practices are rapidly changing in science and policy research because of growing awareness of its harmful effects on environmental and human health. Informed by developments in environmental epigenetics and exposomics, a turn to the body is now evident, which includes generating more granular data to define individual disease risks and specify personal health interventions. By turning their attention towards the body, scientific researchers are also zeroing in on the contexts and conditions of exposure, and how living environments impact air's toxicity. Evidence shows air pollution can contribute to the development of asthma. It is not just episodes of high levels of air pollution that matter but its sources, the timing of exposure, and accumulative effects. The knowledge practices of air pollution science are therefore useful sites for exploring how air pollution is entangled within the powerful systems and political economies that enact it. The recent monitoring of asthmatic bodies (rather than environments) with wearable sensors are informing knowledge about how and when exposure happens and is particularly harmful. Yet this more contextual, practical knowledge is often disregarded because the primary focus is on generating more data. By centring the 'sensing body' - which highlights the spaces, times and social practices of exposure that contribute to and worsen asthma - scientific studies can generate more critical analyses of air pollution that are relevant for guiding actions to prevent harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":47064,"journal":{"name":"Science As Culture","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science As Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2025.2491342","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Air pollution knowledge practices are rapidly changing in science and policy research because of growing awareness of its harmful effects on environmental and human health. Informed by developments in environmental epigenetics and exposomics, a turn to the body is now evident, which includes generating more granular data to define individual disease risks and specify personal health interventions. By turning their attention towards the body, scientific researchers are also zeroing in on the contexts and conditions of exposure, and how living environments impact air's toxicity. Evidence shows air pollution can contribute to the development of asthma. It is not just episodes of high levels of air pollution that matter but its sources, the timing of exposure, and accumulative effects. The knowledge practices of air pollution science are therefore useful sites for exploring how air pollution is entangled within the powerful systems and political economies that enact it. The recent monitoring of asthmatic bodies (rather than environments) with wearable sensors are informing knowledge about how and when exposure happens and is particularly harmful. Yet this more contextual, practical knowledge is often disregarded because the primary focus is on generating more data. By centring the 'sensing body' - which highlights the spaces, times and social practices of exposure that contribute to and worsen asthma - scientific studies can generate more critical analyses of air pollution that are relevant for guiding actions to prevent harm.
期刊介绍:
Our culture is a scientific one, defining what is natural and what is rational. Its values can be seen in what are sought out as facts and made as artefacts, what are designed as processes and products, and what are forged as weapons and filmed as wonders. In our daily experience, power is exercised through expertise, e.g. in science, technology and medicine. Science as Culture explores how all these shape the values which contend for influence over the wider society. Science mediates our cultural experience. It increasingly defines what it is to be a person, through genetics, medicine and information technology. Its values get embodied and naturalized in concepts, techniques, research priorities, gadgets and advertising. Many films, artworks and novels express popular concerns about these developments. In a society where icons of progress are drawn from science, technology and medicine, they are either celebrated or demonised. Often their progress is feared as ’unnatural’, while their critics are labelled ’irrational’. Public concerns are rebuffed by ostensibly value-neutral experts and positivist polemics. Yet the culture of science is open to study like any other culture. Cultural studies analyses the role of expertise throughout society. Many journals address the history, philosophy and social studies of science, its popularisation, and the public understanding of society.