The impact of brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip on caregivers and families : a thematic analysis of literature review and stakeholder survey.

IF 3.1 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Joanna Craven, Olivia O'Malley, Wesley W E S Theunissen, Daniel C Perry
{"title":"The impact of brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip on caregivers and families : a thematic analysis of literature review and stakeholder survey.","authors":"Joanna Craven, Olivia O'Malley, Wesley W E S Theunissen, Daniel C Perry","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0063.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the effect on the family and/or caregivers when infants undergo brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by integrating findings from a literature review and stakeholder survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thematic analysis combining a comprehensive literature review and data from a UK-based online survey with international involvement. Identification of key themes related to the effect of brace treatment for DDH on the family/ caregivers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The literature review identified eight relevant articles for inclusion. The online survey had 131 participants. During the thematic analysis, ten key themes emerged, highlighting substantial emotional distress among parents, issues with information provision and consistency, and practical challenges related to clothing, feeding, and sleep. Additional concerns included cleanliness, equipment, child development concerns, infant discomfort, bonding, financial impact, and disruption to daily life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Brace treatment for DDH has a significant impact on various aspects of family life. Identifying the specific areas of family life affected by brace treatment enables recognition of key challenges, informing the development of robust support systems, clear communication strategies, and customized informational resources. While bracing remains the cornerstone of DDH management in infants, with proven effectiveness in achieving positive clinical outcomes, substantial uncertainties persist regarding critical aspects of treatment, including determining the severity of dysplasia that warrants brace treatment, the optimal duration of treatment, and the most effective approach to brace removal. Resolving these uncertainties requires well-designed randomized controlled trials to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines. Furthermore, evaluations of brace treatments should explicitly incorporate family-centred outcomes. Developing a core outcome set focused on family-relevant measures would significantly enhance the design, comparability, and quality of future DDH research.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"6 8","pages":"851-858"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313359/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0063.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To identify the effect on the family and/or caregivers when infants undergo brace treatment for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) by integrating findings from a literature review and stakeholder survey.

Methods: Thematic analysis combining a comprehensive literature review and data from a UK-based online survey with international involvement. Identification of key themes related to the effect of brace treatment for DDH on the family/ caregivers.

Results: The literature review identified eight relevant articles for inclusion. The online survey had 131 participants. During the thematic analysis, ten key themes emerged, highlighting substantial emotional distress among parents, issues with information provision and consistency, and practical challenges related to clothing, feeding, and sleep. Additional concerns included cleanliness, equipment, child development concerns, infant discomfort, bonding, financial impact, and disruption to daily life.

Conclusion: Brace treatment for DDH has a significant impact on various aspects of family life. Identifying the specific areas of family life affected by brace treatment enables recognition of key challenges, informing the development of robust support systems, clear communication strategies, and customized informational resources. While bracing remains the cornerstone of DDH management in infants, with proven effectiveness in achieving positive clinical outcomes, substantial uncertainties persist regarding critical aspects of treatment, including determining the severity of dysplasia that warrants brace treatment, the optimal duration of treatment, and the most effective approach to brace removal. Resolving these uncertainties requires well-designed randomized controlled trials to establish clear, evidence-based guidelines. Furthermore, evaluations of brace treatments should explicitly incorporate family-centred outcomes. Developing a core outcome set focused on family-relevant measures would significantly enhance the design, comparability, and quality of future DDH research.

Abstract Image

托具治疗髋关节发育不良对护理者和家庭的影响:文献回顾和利益相关者调查的专题分析。
目的:通过整合文献综述和利益相关者调查的结果,确定婴儿接受髋发育不良(DDH)支架治疗对家庭和/或照顾者的影响。方法:专题分析结合综合文献综述和数据来自英国的在线调查与国际参与。确定与支具治疗DDH对家庭/照顾者的影响相关的关键主题。结果:文献综述确定了8篇相关文章纳入。这项在线调查共有131名参与者。在主题分析过程中,出现了十个关键主题,突出了父母的严重情绪困扰,信息提供和一致性问题,以及与服装,饮食和睡眠相关的实际挑战。其他问题包括清洁、设备、儿童发展问题、婴儿不适、关系、经济影响以及对日常生活的干扰。结论:支具治疗DDH对家庭生活各方面均有显著影响。确定受支架治疗影响的家庭生活的具体领域,有助于认识到主要挑战,为制定健全的支持系统、明确的沟通策略和定制的信息资源提供信息。虽然支具仍然是婴儿DDH治疗的基石,在取得积极的临床结果方面证明了有效性,但在治疗的关键方面仍然存在大量的不确定性,包括确定需要支具治疗的发育不良的严重程度,最佳治疗持续时间,以及最有效的支具移除方法。解决这些不确定性需要精心设计的随机对照试验,以建立明确的循证指南。此外,支架治疗的评估应明确纳入以家庭为中心的结果。开发一个以家庭相关措施为重点的核心结果集将显著提高未来DDH研究的设计、可比性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信