Hélène P. De Luca , Stéphanie Boudon , Alex Odermatt , Linda Schenk , Nancy B. Hopf
{"title":"Estimates of skin and blood concentrations of UV-filters: Insights from in vitro skin experiments","authors":"Hélène P. De Luca , Stéphanie Boudon , Alex Odermatt , Linda Schenk , Nancy B. Hopf","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters mitigate radiation transmission through the skin; however, uncertainties persist regarding their ability to cross the skin barrier and induce toxicity. Our aim was to use published <em>in vitro</em> skin permeation studies to predict UV-filter concentrations in blood and skin. In our review, we identified 35 papers reporting <em>in vitro</em> skin permeation of the 12 most used organic UV-filters. We estimated the UV-filters’ theoretical concentrations in blood and skin layers for two case scenarios and compared them with <em>in vivo</em> data. Five of the UV-filters penetrated skin as the parent compound, among these the highest estimated blood concentration was for benzophenone 4 (419 mg/L). These were overestimated (up to 100 times) compared to the reported <em>in vivo</em> results. Ten of the UV-filters permeated skin, among these ethylhexyl salicylate had the highest estimated skin concentration (15.99 g/cm<sup>3</sup>). Results from literature were inconsistent, likely due to different experimental <em>in vitro</em> methods. Although skin can metabolize chemicals, none of the included studies quantified potential UV-filter metabolites. We recommend future <em>in vitro</em> skin permeation studies to standardize the methods according to existing guidelines (including quantification of the metabolites) and screen UV-filters for possible skin absorption followed by a risk evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 105916"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0273230025001485","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Organic ultraviolet (UV) filters mitigate radiation transmission through the skin; however, uncertainties persist regarding their ability to cross the skin barrier and induce toxicity. Our aim was to use published in vitro skin permeation studies to predict UV-filter concentrations in blood and skin. In our review, we identified 35 papers reporting in vitro skin permeation of the 12 most used organic UV-filters. We estimated the UV-filters’ theoretical concentrations in blood and skin layers for two case scenarios and compared them with in vivo data. Five of the UV-filters penetrated skin as the parent compound, among these the highest estimated blood concentration was for benzophenone 4 (419 mg/L). These were overestimated (up to 100 times) compared to the reported in vivo results. Ten of the UV-filters permeated skin, among these ethylhexyl salicylate had the highest estimated skin concentration (15.99 g/cm3). Results from literature were inconsistent, likely due to different experimental in vitro methods. Although skin can metabolize chemicals, none of the included studies quantified potential UV-filter metabolites. We recommend future in vitro skin permeation studies to standardize the methods according to existing guidelines (including quantification of the metabolites) and screen UV-filters for possible skin absorption followed by a risk evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)