Comprehensive identification of pathogenic tandem repeat expansions in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: advantages of long-read vs. short-read sequencing.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Experimental Biology and Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ebm.2025.10593
Eleonora Sabetta, Karin Rallmann, Jonas Bergquist, Pille Taba, Abigail L Pfaff, Bal Hari Poudel, Davide Ferrari, Massimo Locatelli, Sulev Kõks
{"title":"Comprehensive identification of pathogenic tandem repeat expansions in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: advantages of long-read vs. short-read sequencing.","authors":"Eleonora Sabetta, Karin Rallmann, Jonas Bergquist, Pille Taba, Abigail L Pfaff, Bal Hari Poudel, Davide Ferrari, Massimo Locatelli, Sulev Kõks","doi":"10.3389/ebm.2025.10593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder presenting progressive weakness of the bulbar and extremity muscles, leading to a wide-ranging clinical phenotype. More than 30 genes have been associated to genetically inherited ALS yet, approximately 85%-90% of ALS cases are sporadic. Short tandem repeats expansions, have recently been found in clinically diagnosed ALS patients and are currently investigated as potential genetic biomarkers. In this paper we compare the investigation of pathological tandem repeat expansions on a group of ALS patients by comparing the standard short-read sequencing (SRS) technique with a long-read-sequencing (LRS) method which has recently become more accessible. Blood samples from 47 sporadic ALS cases were subjected to SRS by Illumina Whole Genome Sequencing. The genome-wide tandem repeat expansions were genotyped using GangSTR, while wANNOVAR was used for variant annotation. Uncertain cases were further explored using LRS. SRS identified pathological expansions in <i>HTT</i>, <i>ATXN2</i>, and <i>CACNA1A</i> genes in one patient, which were not confirmed with LRS. The latter identified large tandem repeat expansions in the C9orf72 gene of one patient that were missed by SRS. Our findings suggest that LRS should be preferred to SRS for accurate identification of pathological tandem repeat expansions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12163,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","volume":"250 ","pages":"10593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ebm.2025.10593","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disorder presenting progressive weakness of the bulbar and extremity muscles, leading to a wide-ranging clinical phenotype. More than 30 genes have been associated to genetically inherited ALS yet, approximately 85%-90% of ALS cases are sporadic. Short tandem repeats expansions, have recently been found in clinically diagnosed ALS patients and are currently investigated as potential genetic biomarkers. In this paper we compare the investigation of pathological tandem repeat expansions on a group of ALS patients by comparing the standard short-read sequencing (SRS) technique with a long-read-sequencing (LRS) method which has recently become more accessible. Blood samples from 47 sporadic ALS cases were subjected to SRS by Illumina Whole Genome Sequencing. The genome-wide tandem repeat expansions were genotyped using GangSTR, while wANNOVAR was used for variant annotation. Uncertain cases were further explored using LRS. SRS identified pathological expansions in HTT, ATXN2, and CACNA1A genes in one patient, which were not confirmed with LRS. The latter identified large tandem repeat expansions in the C9orf72 gene of one patient that were missed by SRS. Our findings suggest that LRS should be preferred to SRS for accurate identification of pathological tandem repeat expansions.

Abstract Image

散发性肌萎缩性侧索硬化症致病性串联重复序列扩增的综合鉴定:长读序列与短读序列测序的优势。
肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)是一种神经退行性疾病,表现为球和四肢肌肉的进行性无力,导致广泛的临床表型。目前已有30多个基因与遗传性ALS相关,大约85%-90%的ALS病例是散发的。短串联重复序列扩增最近在临床诊断的ALS患者中被发现,目前正在研究作为潜在的遗传生物标志物。在本文中,我们通过比较标准短读测序(SRS)技术和长读测序(LRS)方法对一组ALS患者病理串联重复扩增的研究进行了比较。采用Illumina全基因组测序技术对47例散发性ALS患者进行SRS检测。使用GangSTR对全基因组串联重复序列扩增进行基因分型,使用wANNOVAR进行变异注释。利用LRS进一步探讨不确定病例。SRS在1例患者中发现HTT、ATXN2和CACNA1A基因的病理扩增,但未在LRS中证实。后者在一名患者的C9orf72基因中发现了SRS未发现的大串联重复扩增。我们的研究结果表明,在准确识别病理性串联重复扩增方面,LRS优于SRS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Biology and Medicine
Experimental Biology and Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
157
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Experimental Biology and Medicine (EBM) is a global, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research in the biomedical sciences. EBM provides both research and review articles as well as meeting symposia and brief communications. Articles in EBM represent cutting edge research at the overlapping junctions of the biological, physical and engineering sciences that impact upon the health and welfare of the world''s population. Topics covered in EBM include: Anatomy/Pathology; Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Bioimaging; Biomedical Engineering; Bionanoscience; Cell and Developmental Biology; Endocrinology and Nutrition; Environmental Health/Biomarkers/Precision Medicine; Genomics, Proteomics, and Bioinformatics; Immunology/Microbiology/Virology; Mechanisms of Aging; Neuroscience; Pharmacology and Toxicology; Physiology; Stem Cell Biology; Structural Biology; Systems Biology and Microphysiological Systems; and Translational Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信