Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Methods for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Lingling Di, Hui Yong, Zhikai Wang, Yu Zhou, Huaitao Liu, Shijie Wei
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Methods for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.","authors":"Lingling Di, Hui Yong, Zhikai Wang, Yu Zhou, Huaitao Liu, Shijie Wei","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective study compared the therapeutic efficacy of Ginaton alone, Ginaton combined with glucocorticoids, or Ginaton with mouse nerve growth factor (mNGF) in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Between January 2014 and June 2015, 101 SSNHL patients, with treatment initiated 3-10 days post onset, were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 2-week regimens: Ginaton alone (n = 33), Ginaton + glucocorticoid (n = 34), or Ginaton + mNGF (n = 34). Primary outcome was overall hearing improvement. Effectiveness rates were 78.79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.8%-89.9%) for Ginaton, 79.41% (95% CI 62.9%-90.1%) for Ginaton + glucocorticoid, and 88.24% (95% CI 72.5%-95.8%) for Ginaton + mNGF; these differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). All 3 groups showed significant post-treatment reductions in whole blood viscosity (high, medium, low shear rates; all P < .01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all P < .01), and triglycerides (all P < .01). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, an inflammatory marker, significantly decreased in the Ginaton + glucocorticoid (P < .05) and Ginaton + mNGF groups (P < .01). While all regimens demonstrated positive effects on hearing and surrogate markers, and Ginaton + mNGF showed a numerically higher hearing improvement rate, no statistically superior regimen for overall hearing was identified. This study suggests these approaches improve inner ear blood rheology and inflammation. However, larger, placebo-controlled trials are crucial to confirm efficacy and elucidate the distinct pharmacological contributions of each component, considering the study's sample size and open-label design.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective study compared the therapeutic efficacy of Ginaton alone, Ginaton combined with glucocorticoids, or Ginaton with mouse nerve growth factor (mNGF) in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). Between January 2014 and June 2015, 101 SSNHL patients, with treatment initiated 3-10 days post onset, were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 2-week regimens: Ginaton alone (n = 33), Ginaton + glucocorticoid (n = 34), or Ginaton + mNGF (n = 34). Primary outcome was overall hearing improvement. Effectiveness rates were 78.79% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.8%-89.9%) for Ginaton, 79.41% (95% CI 62.9%-90.1%) for Ginaton + glucocorticoid, and 88.24% (95% CI 72.5%-95.8%) for Ginaton + mNGF; these differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). All 3 groups showed significant post-treatment reductions in whole blood viscosity (high, medium, low shear rates; all P < .01), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all P < .01), and triglycerides (all P < .01). The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, an inflammatory marker, significantly decreased in the Ginaton + glucocorticoid (P < .05) and Ginaton + mNGF groups (P < .01). While all regimens demonstrated positive effects on hearing and surrogate markers, and Ginaton + mNGF showed a numerically higher hearing improvement rate, no statistically superior regimen for overall hearing was identified. This study suggests these approaches improve inner ear blood rheology and inflammation. However, larger, placebo-controlled trials are crucial to confirm efficacy and elucidate the distinct pharmacological contributions of each component, considering the study's sample size and open-label design.

突发性感音神经性听力损失治疗方法的比较分析。
本前瞻性研究比较了银杏碱单用、银杏碱联合糖皮质激素、银杏碱联合小鼠神经生长因子(mNGF)治疗突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)患者的疗效。在2014年1月至2015年6月期间,101例SSNHL患者在发病后3-10天开始治疗,随机分配接受3个2周方案中的1个:Ginaton单独(n = 33), Ginaton +糖皮质激素(n = 34)或Ginaton + mNGF (n = 34)。主要结果是整体听力改善。Ginaton的有效率为78.79%(95%可信区间[CI] 61.8% ~ 89.9%), Ginaton +糖皮质激素的有效率为79.41% (95% CI 62.9% ~ 90.1%), Ginaton + mNGF的有效率为88.24% (95% CI 72.5% ~ 95.8%);差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。所有3组治疗后全血粘度(高、中、低剪切率;所有P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信