Posterior Laminectomy and Lateral Mass Screw Fixation With 1-2 Levels Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chuang Li, Jingfeng Li, Qixin Zheng
{"title":"Posterior Laminectomy and Lateral Mass Screw Fixation With 1-2 Levels Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.","authors":"Chuang Li, Jingfeng Li, Qixin Zheng","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation combined with 1-2 levels of laminoplasty in patients with severe complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>In this single-center retrospective observational study, data collected from 15 patients who underwent modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (modified PLF group) were compared with those from 45 patients who underwent standard cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (PLF group) during the same period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Odom's grade, and development of C5 nerve palsy were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size required to detect clinically significant differences between the groups. Based on an expected effect size of 0.5, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 80%, the analysis indicated that a minimum of 60 patients per group would be needed. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant reduction in the extent of cervical kyphosis (P<0.05) was observed at the last follow-up in both groups. There were no significant differences in the JOA score, VAS, and NDI, all of which significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent and good Odom's grading (100% and 88.89% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) and the incidence of C5 nerve palsy (0% and 11.11% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The power analysis confirmed that the study was adequately powered to detect significant differences in cervical curvature and clinical outcomes, although the smaller sample size of the modified PLF group (n=15) may have limited the ability to detect smaller but clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation achieved improved clinical outcomes after medium-to-long-term follow-up in patients with severe and complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can stabilize the cervical spine, fully decompress the spinal canal, and prevent excessive backward drifting of the cervical spinal cord, thereby reducing cervical spinal cord injury and C5 nerve palsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective, observational study.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation combined with 1-2 levels of laminoplasty in patients with severe complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Summary of background data: In this single-center retrospective observational study, data collected from 15 patients who underwent modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (modified PLF group) were compared with those from 45 patients who underwent standard cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation (PLF group) during the same period.

Methods: The cervical curvature, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), Odom's grade, and development of C5 nerve palsy were compared preoperatively and postoperatively. A power analysis was conducted to determine the sample size required to detect clinically significant differences between the groups. Based on an expected effect size of 0.5, a significance level (α) of 0.05, and a power (1-β) of 80%, the analysis indicated that a minimum of 60 patients per group would be needed. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years.

Results: A significant reduction in the extent of cervical kyphosis (P<0.05) was observed at the last follow-up in both groups. There were no significant differences in the JOA score, VAS, and NDI, all of which significantly improved in both groups. The rates of excellent and good Odom's grading (100% and 88.89% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) and the incidence of C5 nerve palsy (0% and 11.11% in the modified PLF and PLF groups, respectively) were significantly different between the 2 groups (P<0.05). The power analysis confirmed that the study was adequately powered to detect significant differences in cervical curvature and clinical outcomes, although the smaller sample size of the modified PLF group (n=15) may have limited the ability to detect smaller but clinically meaningful differences in secondary outcomes.

Conclusions: Modified cervical posterior laminectomy with lateral mass screw internal fixation achieved improved clinical outcomes after medium-to-long-term follow-up in patients with severe and complex cervical spondylotic myelopathy. It can stabilize the cervical spine, fully decompress the spinal canal, and prevent excessive backward drifting of the cervical spinal cord, thereby reducing cervical spinal cord injury and C5 nerve palsy.

后椎板切除术+侧块螺钉固定+ 1-2节段椎板成形术治疗脊髓型颈椎病。
研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。目的:本研究旨在评价颈椎后椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉内固定联合1-2节段椎板成形术治疗重度复杂脊髓型颈椎病的临床疗效。背景资料总结:在这项单中心回顾性观察性研究中,我们收集了15例接受改良后椎板切除术合并侧块螺钉内固定的患者(改良PLF组)与同期45例接受标准后椎板切除术合并侧块螺钉内固定的患者(PLF组)的数据进行了比较。方法:比较术前、术后颈椎曲度、日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、视觉模拟量表(VAS)、颈部残疾指数(NDI)、奥多姆评分(Odom’s)及C5神经麻痹的发展情况。进行功效分析以确定检测组间临床显著差异所需的样本量。基于预期效应量为0.5,显著性水平(α)为0.05,功率(1-β)为80%,分析表明每组至少需要60名患者。平均随访时间为3.5年。结论:改良颈椎后椎板切除术联合侧块螺钉内固定对重度复杂脊髓型颈椎病患者进行中长期随访后,临床疗效得到改善。它可以稳定颈椎,充分减压椎管,防止颈脊髓过度向后漂移,从而减少颈脊髓损伤和C5神经麻痹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信