Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Katherine Bailey, Elina Farahani, Sunny Raval, Ke Xin Lin, Muhammadhasan Nasser, Jonathan Hersh, Farah Khan, Shaan Chugh, Alison Freeland, Amir Ginzburg, Nazia Sharfuddin
{"title":"Evaluating the implementation of a longitudinal cocurricular experiential quality improvement training programme for undergraduate medical students.","authors":"Katherine Bailey, Elina Farahani, Sunny Raval, Ke Xin Lin, Muhammadhasan Nasser, Jonathan Hersh, Farah Khan, Shaan Chugh, Alison Freeland, Amir Ginzburg, Nazia Sharfuddin","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) is a core competency in undergraduate medical education. While didactic and experiential learning enhance QIPS knowledge and skills, there are limited experiential opportunities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a longitudinal didactic and experiential student-led programme, Quality Improvement Experiential Student Training (QuEST). QuEST was piloted during year 1, where learners completed online modules, didactic seminars, an experiential project and mentorship meetings with the programme's faculty chair (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1). We implemented a formal leadership structure, adapted the curriculum, and changed mentorship meetings to student-led in year 2 (PDSA 2). In response to reduced learner satisfaction, we reintroduced faculty-led mentorship meetings in year 3 as well as revised the experiential project screening process and decreased the cohort size to enhance programme operations. The outcome was self-reported confidence in completing a QIPS project, which we aimed to achieve at least 60% of learners reporting confidence each year. Fourteen learners were enrolled in year 1, 45 in year 2 and 18 in year 3. After year 1, 86% of learners reported confidence in completing a QIPS project (from 39% preprogramme; p<0.01), 64% in year 2 (from 16%; p<0.01) and 75% in year 3 (from 28%; p<0.01). Programme satisfaction was 4.25/5 in year 1, 4.27/5 in year 2 and 4.75/5 in year 3. Strengths included experiential learning and support from the programme. Opportunities for improvement included further check-in meetings to promote accountability and project progression. The QuEST programme equipped learners with the confidence needed to complete a QIPS project. The provision of mentorship was identified as a common driver for learner satisfaction, with the suggestion to provide further structured and unstructured mentorship opportunities embedded in the programme. Future work may consider longitudinally assessing changes to learner behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quality improvement and patient safety (QIPS) is a core competency in undergraduate medical education. While didactic and experiential learning enhance QIPS knowledge and skills, there are limited experiential opportunities. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a longitudinal didactic and experiential student-led programme, Quality Improvement Experiential Student Training (QuEST). QuEST was piloted during year 1, where learners completed online modules, didactic seminars, an experiential project and mentorship meetings with the programme's faculty chair (Plan-Do-Study-Act [PDSA] 1). We implemented a formal leadership structure, adapted the curriculum, and changed mentorship meetings to student-led in year 2 (PDSA 2). In response to reduced learner satisfaction, we reintroduced faculty-led mentorship meetings in year 3 as well as revised the experiential project screening process and decreased the cohort size to enhance programme operations. The outcome was self-reported confidence in completing a QIPS project, which we aimed to achieve at least 60% of learners reporting confidence each year. Fourteen learners were enrolled in year 1, 45 in year 2 and 18 in year 3. After year 1, 86% of learners reported confidence in completing a QIPS project (from 39% preprogramme; p<0.01), 64% in year 2 (from 16%; p<0.01) and 75% in year 3 (from 28%; p<0.01). Programme satisfaction was 4.25/5 in year 1, 4.27/5 in year 2 and 4.75/5 in year 3. Strengths included experiential learning and support from the programme. Opportunities for improvement included further check-in meetings to promote accountability and project progression. The QuEST programme equipped learners with the confidence needed to complete a QIPS project. The provision of mentorship was identified as a common driver for learner satisfaction, with the suggestion to provide further structured and unstructured mentorship opportunities embedded in the programme. Future work may consider longitudinally assessing changes to learner behaviour.

评估医科本科生纵向课程体验式素质提升训练计划的实施。
质量改进与患者安全(QIPS)是本科医学教育的核心竞争力。虽然教学和体验式学习提高了QIPS的知识和技能,但体验机会有限。本研究旨在评估以学生为主导的纵向教学与体验式课程“品质改善体验式学生训练”(QuEST)的可行性与有效性。QuEST在第一年进行了试点,学习者完成了在线模块、教学研讨会、体验项目和与课程教师主席的指导会议(计划-执行-研究-行动[PDSA] 1)。我们实施了正式的领导结构,调整了课程,并在二年级将导师会议改为学生主导(PDSA 2)。为了应对学习者满意度下降的问题,我们在第三年重新引入了教师领导的导师会议,并修订了体验式项目筛选过程,减少了队列规模,以加强项目运作。结果是完成QIPS项目的自我报告信心,我们的目标是每年至少有60%的学习者报告信心。1年级14人,2年级45人,3年级18人。第1年后,86%的学习者表示有信心完成QIPS项目(从39%的预课程;p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信