Sunhyung Choi, Bombi Park, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, So-Youn Jung, Dong-Eun Lee, Jai-Hong Han
{"title":"Prediction of upstaging in DCIS: the dominant role of pathological over imaging risk factors.","authors":"Sunhyung Choi, Bombi Park, Eun-Gyeong Lee, Seeyoun Lee, Han-Sung Kang, So-Youn Jung, Dong-Eun Lee, Jai-Hong Han","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07768-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer with variable risk of upstaging to invasive carcinoma. Accurate preoperative risk stratification is critical to guide management decisions and minimize overtreatment. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological and imaging predictors of DCIS upstaging to invasive cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 701 patients diagnosed with DCIS, among whom 200 (28.5%) were upstaged to microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between upstaging and various factors, including tumor size, nuclear grade, comedo necrosis, progesterone receptor (PR) negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, and mammographic findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Tumor size > 5 cm, comedo necrosis, PR negativity, and mammographic microcalcifications were independent predictors of upstaging. While HER2 overexpression was significant in univariate analysis, it was not retained in the multivariate model. Non-mass lesions on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were not significant predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating these markers into preoperative risk stratification models may improve individualized treatment planning and reduce overtreatment in patients with DCIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"325-334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07768-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-invasive breast cancer with variable risk of upstaging to invasive carcinoma. Accurate preoperative risk stratification is critical to guide management decisions and minimize overtreatment. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological and imaging predictors of DCIS upstaging to invasive cancer.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 701 patients diagnosed with DCIS, among whom 200 (28.5%) were upstaged to microinvasive or invasive carcinoma. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between upstaging and various factors, including tumor size, nuclear grade, comedo necrosis, progesterone receptor (PR) negativity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, and mammographic findings.
Results: Tumor size > 5 cm, comedo necrosis, PR negativity, and mammographic microcalcifications were independent predictors of upstaging. While HER2 overexpression was significant in univariate analysis, it was not retained in the multivariate model. Non-mass lesions on ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were not significant predictors.
Conclusion: Integrating these markers into preoperative risk stratification models may improve individualized treatment planning and reduce overtreatment in patients with DCIS.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.