Intracranial Pressure Monitor Insertion in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: Does Timing Matter?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/00031348251363504
Michael D Gaziano, Peter Aziz, Alison Muller, Anthony Martin, H Christopher Lawson, Eugene F Reilly, Christopher A Butts, Thomas A Geng, Adrian W Ong
{"title":"Intracranial Pressure Monitor Insertion in Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: Does Timing Matter?","authors":"Michael D Gaziano, Peter Aziz, Alison Muller, Anthony Martin, H Christopher Lawson, Eugene F Reilly, Christopher A Butts, Thomas A Geng, Adrian W Ong","doi":"10.1177/00031348251363504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIntracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is recommended in selected patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Optimal timing of ICPM insertion after sTBI is not well studied. We aimed to evaluate if timing of ICPM insertion would impact outcomes.Materials and MethodsWe utilized data from 2018 to 2021 from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Patients ≥16 years from level 1 and 2 trauma centers with isolated blunt sTBI were included. Nonsurvivable brain injury (AIS-head = 6) and those needing emergent open cranial (OC) procedures within 2 hours of admission were excluded. Timing of ICPM insertion was categorized as follows: no ICPM insertion, ≤4 h, >4 to ≤12 h, and >12 h. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables associated with mortality.Results17 715 patients were included. 2525 (14%) had ICPM placed, 2613 (15%) underwent open cranial surgery, and 8757 (49%) died. There was no ICPM insertion in 86% while 8%, 4%, and 2% underwent ICPM insertion ≤4 h, >4 to ≤12 h, and >12 h, respectively. Compared to no ICPM, insertion ≤4 h (odds ratio [OR] 0.94 [0.82-1.09]), >4 to ≤12 h (OR 1.18 [0.97-1.43]), and >12 h (OR 1.02 [0.81-1.31]), respectively, were not associated with mortality. Open cranial procedure was associated with reduced risk of death (OR 0.40 [0.36-0.45]).DiscussionFor blunt isolated sTBI, Timing of ICPM insertion was not associated with mortality reduction. Early ICPM insertion may be less important than expeditious OC.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1845-1850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251363504","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIntracranial pressure monitoring (ICPM) is recommended in selected patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). Optimal timing of ICPM insertion after sTBI is not well studied. We aimed to evaluate if timing of ICPM insertion would impact outcomes.Materials and MethodsWe utilized data from 2018 to 2021 from the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Patients ≥16 years from level 1 and 2 trauma centers with isolated blunt sTBI were included. Nonsurvivable brain injury (AIS-head = 6) and those needing emergent open cranial (OC) procedures within 2 hours of admission were excluded. Timing of ICPM insertion was categorized as follows: no ICPM insertion, ≤4 h, >4 to ≤12 h, and >12 h. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to assess variables associated with mortality.Results17 715 patients were included. 2525 (14%) had ICPM placed, 2613 (15%) underwent open cranial surgery, and 8757 (49%) died. There was no ICPM insertion in 86% while 8%, 4%, and 2% underwent ICPM insertion ≤4 h, >4 to ≤12 h, and >12 h, respectively. Compared to no ICPM, insertion ≤4 h (odds ratio [OR] 0.94 [0.82-1.09]), >4 to ≤12 h (OR 1.18 [0.97-1.43]), and >12 h (OR 1.02 [0.81-1.31]), respectively, were not associated with mortality. Open cranial procedure was associated with reduced risk of death (OR 0.40 [0.36-0.45]).DiscussionFor blunt isolated sTBI, Timing of ICPM insertion was not associated with mortality reduction. Early ICPM insertion may be less important than expeditious OC.

颅内压监测仪在孤立性创伤性脑损伤中的植入:时机重要吗?
背景:重度创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)患者推荐采用颅内压监测(ICPM)。sTBI后ICPM的最佳插入时间尚未得到很好的研究。我们的目的是评估ICPM插入时间是否会影响结果。材料和方法我们使用了美国外科医师学会创伤质量改善计划2018年至2021年的数据。包括来自1级和2级创伤中心的孤立性钝性sTBI患者≥16年。排除不可存活的脑损伤(AIS-head = 6)和入院2小时内需要紧急开颅手术的患者。ICPM插入时间分为:无ICPM插入,≤4 h, >4 ~≤12 h, >12 h。采用二元logistic回归分析评估与死亡率相关的变量。结果共纳入17 715例患者。2525例(14%)置入ICPM, 2613例(15%)行开颅手术,8757例(49%)死亡。86%的患者未插入ICPM, 8%、4%和2%的患者分别在ICPM插入≤4 h、bbb4 ~≤12 h和>12 h。与无ICPM相比,插入≤4 h(比值比[OR] 0.94[0.82-1.09])、>4 ~≤12 h(比值比[OR] 1.18[0.97-1.43])和>12 h(比值比[OR] 1.02[0.81-1.31])与死亡率无关。开颅手术与死亡风险降低相关(OR为0.40[0.36-0.45])。对于钝性孤立性sTBI, ICPM插入时间与死亡率降低无关。早期植入术可能不如快速植入术重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信