Harry Gill , James Charles , Robyn Grant , James Gardiner , Karl Bates , Charlotte Brassey
{"title":"Gait tracking in dogs using DeepLabCut: A markerless machine learning approach for controlled settings","authors":"Harry Gill , James Charles , Robyn Grant , James Gardiner , Karl Bates , Charlotte Brassey","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Analysing locomotion is critical for assessing canine health and diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, yet traditional motion capture methods for dog gait analysis remain impractical in many clinical and industry settings. Markerless deep-learning approaches, such as DeepLabCut (DLC), offer a promising alternative, but their performance in gait analysis, particularly across diverse dog breeds, remains largely untested. In addition, the ability to automate aspects of gait parameter extraction from the resulting dataset, an important requirement for industry practitioners, is also widely untested. In this study, we trained a bespoke neural network on a 2100 training frames, for 2D markerless tracking on eight dog breeds and developed a scripted workflow for semi-automated gait parameter extraction. We calculated several temporal and kinematic variables, including duty factor and joint ranges of motion, comparing values of a widely studied breed (Labrador Retrievers) to literature data. Our model’s performance aligned with previous DLC studies, performing strongly on well-defined landmarks (E.g. nose, eye, carpal, tarsal), whilst struggling with less morphologically discrete locations (E.g. shoulder, hip). ANOVA results from our mixed model revealed a significant effect of body part on tracking performance (p = 0.003), yet no significant effect of breed (p = 0.828) and a small interaction effect between breed and body part (p = 0.049). Our semi-automated workflow successfully extracted gait parameters across our study breeds, though performance was highly dependent on the quality of underlying tracking data. Duty factor and stifle range of motion measures from our labradors showed good overlap with literature values, yet the broader distribution in our data highlighted important limitations in cross-study comparisons. These results suggest that a markerless deep-learning approach could provide a viable alternative to traditional motion capture for canine gait analysis, offering potential applications for both clinical and industry settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106769"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002679","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Analysing locomotion is critical for assessing canine health and diagnosing musculoskeletal conditions, yet traditional motion capture methods for dog gait analysis remain impractical in many clinical and industry settings. Markerless deep-learning approaches, such as DeepLabCut (DLC), offer a promising alternative, but their performance in gait analysis, particularly across diverse dog breeds, remains largely untested. In addition, the ability to automate aspects of gait parameter extraction from the resulting dataset, an important requirement for industry practitioners, is also widely untested. In this study, we trained a bespoke neural network on a 2100 training frames, for 2D markerless tracking on eight dog breeds and developed a scripted workflow for semi-automated gait parameter extraction. We calculated several temporal and kinematic variables, including duty factor and joint ranges of motion, comparing values of a widely studied breed (Labrador Retrievers) to literature data. Our model’s performance aligned with previous DLC studies, performing strongly on well-defined landmarks (E.g. nose, eye, carpal, tarsal), whilst struggling with less morphologically discrete locations (E.g. shoulder, hip). ANOVA results from our mixed model revealed a significant effect of body part on tracking performance (p = 0.003), yet no significant effect of breed (p = 0.828) and a small interaction effect between breed and body part (p = 0.049). Our semi-automated workflow successfully extracted gait parameters across our study breeds, though performance was highly dependent on the quality of underlying tracking data. Duty factor and stifle range of motion measures from our labradors showed good overlap with literature values, yet the broader distribution in our data highlighted important limitations in cross-study comparisons. These results suggest that a markerless deep-learning approach could provide a viable alternative to traditional motion capture for canine gait analysis, offering potential applications for both clinical and industry settings.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals.
Topics covered include:
-Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare
-Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems
-Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation
-Methodological studies within relevant fields
The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects:
-Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals
-Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display
-Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage
-Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances
-Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements