New prognostic score for mortality in critically ill patients. Development and validation

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
M.P. Gracia Arnillas , F. Alvarez Lerma , X. Nuvials Casals , R. Gimeno Costa , N. Mas Bilbao , J. Lobo Palanco , A. Escribá Bárcena , M. Catalán González , M. Martinez Alonso
{"title":"New prognostic score for mortality in critically ill patients. Development and validation","authors":"M.P. Gracia Arnillas ,&nbsp;F. Alvarez Lerma ,&nbsp;X. Nuvials Casals ,&nbsp;R. Gimeno Costa ,&nbsp;N. Mas Bilbao ,&nbsp;J. Lobo Palanco ,&nbsp;A. Escribá Bárcena ,&nbsp;M. Catalán González ,&nbsp;M. Martinez Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Objective: To develop and validate a novel prognostic model to predict mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. <strong>Unlike APACHE II the new model incorporates risk factors assessed throughout the entire ICU stay, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation and</strong> a better understanding of how the probability of mortality changes. Design: Post-hoc analysis of multicenter, prospective data from 167 Spanish hospitals (193 ICUs) collected over 7 years. Patients: Adults (&gt;18 years). Interventions: Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The model was developed using multivariable logistic regression in an estimation group and validated using a separate cohort. Variables of Interest: The <strong>primary outcome was ICU mortality</strong>, which was clearly defined and analyzed in both the model development and validation phases. The model incorporated APACHE II and eight additional factors <strong>evaluated across the entire ICU stay</strong>: prior antibiotic use (48 h pre-ICU), hospitalization days before ICU, hematologic diagnoses, invasive mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, shunt ventricular, renal clearance techniques, and infections associated with invasive devices leading to sepsis. Results: Of the 137,666 patients, 91,777 were assigned to the estimation group and 45,889 to validation. Mortality was 10.8 %, strongly associated with APACHE II severity. The new model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability (AUROC = 0.872) compared to APACHE II alone (AUROC = 0.826) and it improved reclassification by 52 % over APACHE II: 19.4 % of survivors and 32.75 % of non-survivors. <strong>This improvement, though numerically modest, has clinical relevance by enhancing risk stratification and guiding interventions.</strong> Conclusions: A validated NMP model was developed using nine additional risk factors alongside APACHE II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 155191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a novel prognostic model to predict mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. Unlike APACHE II the new model incorporates risk factors assessed throughout the entire ICU stay, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation and a better understanding of how the probability of mortality changes. Design: Post-hoc analysis of multicenter, prospective data from 167 Spanish hospitals (193 ICUs) collected over 7 years. Patients: Adults (>18 years). Interventions: Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The model was developed using multivariable logistic regression in an estimation group and validated using a separate cohort. Variables of Interest: The primary outcome was ICU mortality, which was clearly defined and analyzed in both the model development and validation phases. The model incorporated APACHE II and eight additional factors evaluated across the entire ICU stay: prior antibiotic use (48 h pre-ICU), hospitalization days before ICU, hematologic diagnoses, invasive mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, shunt ventricular, renal clearance techniques, and infections associated with invasive devices leading to sepsis. Results: Of the 137,666 patients, 91,777 were assigned to the estimation group and 45,889 to validation. Mortality was 10.8 %, strongly associated with APACHE II severity. The new model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability (AUROC = 0.872) compared to APACHE II alone (AUROC = 0.826) and it improved reclassification by 52 % over APACHE II: 19.4 % of survivors and 32.75 % of non-survivors. This improvement, though numerically modest, has clinical relevance by enhancing risk stratification and guiding interventions. Conclusions: A validated NMP model was developed using nine additional risk factors alongside APACHE II.
危重病人死亡率的新预后评分。开发和验证
目的:建立并验证一种新的预测ICU重症患者死亡率的预后模型。与APACHE II不同,新模型纳入了整个ICU住院期间的风险因素评估,允许更全面的评估和更好地了解死亡概率如何变化。设计:对167家西班牙医院(193个icu) 7年来收集的多中心前瞻性数据进行事后分析。患者:成人(18岁)。干预措施:分析人口统计学和临床变量。该模型在估计组中使用多变量逻辑回归建立,并使用单独的队列进行验证。感兴趣的变量:主要结局是ICU死亡率,在模型开发和验证阶段对其进行了明确定义和分析。该模型纳入了APACHE II和整个ICU住院期间评估的八个额外因素:先前使用抗生素(ICU前48小时),ICU前住院天数,血液学诊断,有创机械通气,肠外营养,分流室,肾脏清除技术,以及与侵入性设备相关的感染导致败血症。结果:在137,666例患者中,91,777例被分配到估计组,45,889例被分配到验证组。死亡率为10.8%,与APACHE II严重程度密切相关。与单独的APACHE II相比,新模型显示出更好的区分能力(AUROC = 0.872),并且比APACHE II提高了52%的再分类:19.4%的幸存者和32.75%的非幸存者。这一改善,虽然数字上不大,但通过加强风险分层和指导干预措施具有临床意义。结论:一个经过验证的NMP模型与APACHE II一起使用了9个额外的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信