M.P. Gracia Arnillas , F. Alvarez Lerma , X. Nuvials Casals , R. Gimeno Costa , N. Mas Bilbao , J. Lobo Palanco , A. Escribá Bárcena , M. Catalán González , M. Martinez Alonso
{"title":"New prognostic score for mortality in critically ill patients. Development and validation","authors":"M.P. Gracia Arnillas , F. Alvarez Lerma , X. Nuvials Casals , R. Gimeno Costa , N. Mas Bilbao , J. Lobo Palanco , A. Escribá Bárcena , M. Catalán González , M. Martinez Alonso","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2025.155191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Objective: To develop and validate a novel prognostic model to predict mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. <strong>Unlike APACHE II the new model incorporates risk factors assessed throughout the entire ICU stay, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation and</strong> a better understanding of how the probability of mortality changes. Design: Post-hoc analysis of multicenter, prospective data from 167 Spanish hospitals (193 ICUs) collected over 7 years. Patients: Adults (>18 years). Interventions: Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The model was developed using multivariable logistic regression in an estimation group and validated using a separate cohort. Variables of Interest: The <strong>primary outcome was ICU mortality</strong>, which was clearly defined and analyzed in both the model development and validation phases. The model incorporated APACHE II and eight additional factors <strong>evaluated across the entire ICU stay</strong>: prior antibiotic use (48 h pre-ICU), hospitalization days before ICU, hematologic diagnoses, invasive mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, shunt ventricular, renal clearance techniques, and infections associated with invasive devices leading to sepsis. Results: Of the 137,666 patients, 91,777 were assigned to the estimation group and 45,889 to validation. Mortality was 10.8 %, strongly associated with APACHE II severity. The new model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability (AUROC = 0.872) compared to APACHE II alone (AUROC = 0.826) and it improved reclassification by 52 % over APACHE II: 19.4 % of survivors and 32.75 % of non-survivors. <strong>This improvement, though numerically modest, has clinical relevance by enhancing risk stratification and guiding interventions.</strong> Conclusions: A validated NMP model was developed using nine additional risk factors alongside APACHE II.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 155191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944125001789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To develop and validate a novel prognostic model to predict mortality in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. Unlike APACHE II the new model incorporates risk factors assessed throughout the entire ICU stay, allowing for a more comprehensive evaluation and a better understanding of how the probability of mortality changes. Design: Post-hoc analysis of multicenter, prospective data from 167 Spanish hospitals (193 ICUs) collected over 7 years. Patients: Adults (>18 years). Interventions: Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed. The model was developed using multivariable logistic regression in an estimation group and validated using a separate cohort. Variables of Interest: The primary outcome was ICU mortality, which was clearly defined and analyzed in both the model development and validation phases. The model incorporated APACHE II and eight additional factors evaluated across the entire ICU stay: prior antibiotic use (48 h pre-ICU), hospitalization days before ICU, hematologic diagnoses, invasive mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, shunt ventricular, renal clearance techniques, and infections associated with invasive devices leading to sepsis. Results: Of the 137,666 patients, 91,777 were assigned to the estimation group and 45,889 to validation. Mortality was 10.8 %, strongly associated with APACHE II severity. The new model demonstrated superior discriminatory ability (AUROC = 0.872) compared to APACHE II alone (AUROC = 0.826) and it improved reclassification by 52 % over APACHE II: 19.4 % of survivors and 32.75 % of non-survivors. This improvement, though numerically modest, has clinical relevance by enhancing risk stratification and guiding interventions. Conclusions: A validated NMP model was developed using nine additional risk factors alongside APACHE II.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice.
The Journal will include articles which discuss:
All aspects of health services research in critical care
System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine
The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain
Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery
Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients
The team approach in the OR and ICU
System-based research
Medical ethics
Technology in medicine
Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education
Residency Education.