Screening for genotoxicants in food: A data-driven approach using food composition data and machine learning based in silico models

IF 3.1 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Computational Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1016/j.comtox.2025.100370
Jakob Menz, Bernd Schäfer
{"title":"Screening for genotoxicants in food: A data-driven approach using food composition data and machine learning based in silico models","authors":"Jakob Menz,&nbsp;Bernd Schäfer","doi":"10.1016/j.comtox.2025.100370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Foods represent complex mixtures of constituents and contaminants, some of which may pose risks to health through genotoxic effects. We investigated the current capabilities and limitations of a data-driven approach for the systematic identification of genotoxic substances in food. To this end, we used machine learning to develop quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models aimed at predicting outcomes for three <em>in vitro</em> genotoxicity assays: the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), the <em>in vitro</em> chromosomal aberration test (CAvit) and the <em>in vitro</em> micronucleus test (MNvit). These models were applied to screen for putative dietary genotoxicants using the FooDB compound dataset (n = 70,477) as a case study. Overall, 6.6 % of the FooDB compounds were predicted as positive by at least one <em>in silico</em> model, while 7.1 % were predicted as negative by all three models. Depending on the predicted endpoint, between 77 % and 82 % of the FooDB compounds fell outside the model’s applicability domain or gave an equivocal prediction. Interestingly, of the 4,683 FooDB compounds predicted to be positive in at least one <em>in vitro</em> assay, only 491 could be mapped to an experimental data point. As a strategy to progress from <em>in silico</em> screening to risk assessment, we propose a tiered approach that integrates <em>in silico</em> modelling, exposure assessment and experimental testing. While it has to be acknowledged that current food composition databases and <em>in silico</em> models still have limitations, this work illustrates that data-driven approaches hold great promise for enhancing the identification of genotoxicants in foods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37651,"journal":{"name":"Computational Toxicology","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468111325000301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foods represent complex mixtures of constituents and contaminants, some of which may pose risks to health through genotoxic effects. We investigated the current capabilities and limitations of a data-driven approach for the systematic identification of genotoxic substances in food. To this end, we used machine learning to develop quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models aimed at predicting outcomes for three in vitro genotoxicity assays: the bacterial reverse mutation assay (Ames test), the in vitro chromosomal aberration test (CAvit) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNvit). These models were applied to screen for putative dietary genotoxicants using the FooDB compound dataset (n = 70,477) as a case study. Overall, 6.6 % of the FooDB compounds were predicted as positive by at least one in silico model, while 7.1 % were predicted as negative by all three models. Depending on the predicted endpoint, between 77 % and 82 % of the FooDB compounds fell outside the model’s applicability domain or gave an equivocal prediction. Interestingly, of the 4,683 FooDB compounds predicted to be positive in at least one in vitro assay, only 491 could be mapped to an experimental data point. As a strategy to progress from in silico screening to risk assessment, we propose a tiered approach that integrates in silico modelling, exposure assessment and experimental testing. While it has to be acknowledged that current food composition databases and in silico models still have limitations, this work illustrates that data-driven approaches hold great promise for enhancing the identification of genotoxicants in foods.
筛选食品中的基因毒物:使用食品成分数据和基于计算机模型的机器学习的数据驱动方法
食品是成分和污染物的复杂混合物,其中一些可能通过基因毒性作用对健康构成风险。我们调查了目前的能力和局限性的数据驱动的方法系统识别食品中的遗传毒性物质。为此,我们利用机器学习开发了定量结构-活性关系(QSAR)模型,旨在预测三种体外遗传毒性试验的结果:细菌反向突变试验(Ames试验)、体外染色体畸变试验(CAvit)和体外微核试验(MNvit)。这些模型被应用于筛选假定的膳食基因毒物,并以FooDB化合物数据集(n = 70,477)作为案例研究。总体而言,6.6%的FooDB化合物被至少一个硅模型预测为阳性,而7.1%的化合物被所有三个模型预测为阴性。根据预测端点的不同,77%到82%的FooDB化合物超出了模型的适用范围,或者给出了模棱两可的预测。有趣的是,在4683种FooDB化合物中,预计至少有一种在体外试验中呈阳性,但只有491种可以映射到实验数据点。作为一种从硅筛选到风险评估的策略,我们提出了一种集成硅建模、暴露评估和实验测试的分层方法。虽然必须承认,目前的食品成分数据库和计算机模型仍然有局限性,但这项工作表明,数据驱动的方法对加强食品中基因毒物的识别具有很大的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computational Toxicology
Computational Toxicology Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Computational Toxicology is an international journal publishing computational approaches that assist in the toxicological evaluation of new and existing chemical substances assisting in their safety assessment. -All effects relating to human health and environmental toxicity and fate -Prediction of toxicity, metabolism, fate and physico-chemical properties -The development of models from read-across, (Q)SARs, PBPK, QIVIVE, Multi-Scale Models -Big Data in toxicology: integration, management, analysis -Implementation of models through AOPs, IATA, TTC -Regulatory acceptance of models: evaluation, verification and validation -From metals, to small organic molecules to nanoparticles -Pharmaceuticals, pesticides, foods, cosmetics, fine chemicals -Bringing together the views of industry, regulators, academia, NGOs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书