Apportionment methods in resource allocation

IF 7.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
László Á. Kóczy , Tamás Koltai , Balázs R. Sziklai
{"title":"Apportionment methods in resource allocation","authors":"László Á. Kóczy ,&nbsp;Tamás Koltai ,&nbsp;Balázs R. Sziklai","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficient use of resources is of paramount importance in any organization, and this is especially true of the use of human resources. We are considering an organization with a fixed number of workers over a network of subunits. The relative efficiency of these units can be uncovered using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methods. How do we overcome efficiency differences when resources are constrained? Motivated by concerns for quality assurance, we use a method that lexicographically minimizes the tasks per worker. We present a fast algorithm to calculate the optimal allocation. Connections to the apportionment literature — mostly focusing on the fair allocation of voting districts among geographical or administrative regions, — are discussed. The allocation can be validated using DEA: efficiency indicators are now levelled.</div><div>The method is illustrated using data from salary administrators at the Hungarian State Treasury’s 19 county-level subsidiaries. Knowing the number of standard administrative tasks for each subsidiary and each month, we allocate workers proportionally to the busiest months. After the reallocation, the relative efficiency of the worst-performing counties moves from about 60% to over 90%.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103403"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030504832500129X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The efficient use of resources is of paramount importance in any organization, and this is especially true of the use of human resources. We are considering an organization with a fixed number of workers over a network of subunits. The relative efficiency of these units can be uncovered using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) methods. How do we overcome efficiency differences when resources are constrained? Motivated by concerns for quality assurance, we use a method that lexicographically minimizes the tasks per worker. We present a fast algorithm to calculate the optimal allocation. Connections to the apportionment literature — mostly focusing on the fair allocation of voting districts among geographical or administrative regions, — are discussed. The allocation can be validated using DEA: efficiency indicators are now levelled.
The method is illustrated using data from salary administrators at the Hungarian State Treasury’s 19 county-level subsidiaries. Knowing the number of standard administrative tasks for each subsidiary and each month, we allocate workers proportionally to the busiest months. After the reallocation, the relative efficiency of the worst-performing counties moves from about 60% to over 90%.

Abstract Image

资源分配中的分配方法
资源的有效利用在任何组织中都是至关重要的,对人力资源的利用尤其如此。我们正在考虑一个组织,该组织在子单元网络上有固定数量的工人。这些单位的相对效率可以使用数据包络分析(DEA)方法来揭示。当资源受限时,我们如何克服效率差异?出于对质量保证的考虑,我们使用了一种按字典顺序将每个工人的任务最小化的方法。我们提出了一种快速计算最优分配的算法。讨论了与分配文献的联系,这些文献主要集中在地理或行政区域之间公平分配投票区。分配可以使用DEA进行验证:效率指标现已达到水平。该方法使用匈牙利国家财政部19个县级子公司的工资管理人员的数据进行说明。了解每个子公司和每个月的标准管理任务数量,我们根据最繁忙的月份按比例分配人员。在重新分配后,表现最差的县的相对效率从60%左右上升到90%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Omega-international Journal of Management Science
Omega-international Journal of Management Science 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
11.60%
发文量
130
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信