Florence Vroman, Lisa P van der Rijst, Octavian I Bacoş-Cosma, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Marijke Kamsteeg, Paula P M van Lumig, Laura Loman, Marie-Louise L A Schuttelaar, Marjolein S de Bruin-Weller, Marlies de Graaf
{"title":"Upadacitinib in daily practice for refractory atopic dermatitis in adolescents: a case series of the BioDay registry.","authors":"Florence Vroman, Lisa P van der Rijst, Octavian I Bacoş-Cosma, Nicolaas P A Zuithoff, Marijke Kamsteeg, Paula P M van Lumig, Laura Loman, Marie-Louise L A Schuttelaar, Marjolein S de Bruin-Weller, Marlies de Graaf","doi":"10.1080/09546634.2025.2539282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Upadacitinib is approved for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) aged ≥12 years. We evaluated upadacitinib's effectiveness and safety in AD adolescents in daily practice.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen adolescent AD patients from the BioDay registry, treated with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily were evaluated at baseline and after 4, 8, 16, and 28 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score. Patient-reported outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pruritus and presence of sleep disturbance. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean EASI score significantly decreased from 13.4 (95% CI 8.5-18.3) to 7.8 (95% CI 2.4-13.3) after 28 weeks (<i>p</i> = .002). Mean NRS pruritus significantly decreased from 6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.2) to 4.8 (95% CI 3.0-6.6) after 28 weeks (<i>p</i> = .003). At week 16, 75.0% (95% CI 46.8-91.1) achieved EASI ≤7, and 50.0% (95% CI 25.4-74.6) achieved NRS pruritus ≤4. Overall, 31 AEs were reported in 10 patients (66.7%). Five patients (33.3%) discontinued treatment: two due to ineffectiveness, two due to AEs, and one due to laboratory monitoring problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that upadacitinib is effective and relatively safe for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD; however, 33.3% discontinued treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":94235,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","volume":"36 1","pages":"2539282"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of dermatological treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546634.2025.2539282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Upadacitinib is approved for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) aged ≥12 years. We evaluated upadacitinib's effectiveness and safety in AD adolescents in daily practice.
Materials and methods: Fifteen adolescent AD patients from the BioDay registry, treated with upadacitinib 15 mg once daily were evaluated at baseline and after 4, 8, 16, and 28 weeks. Effectiveness was assessed using Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score. Patient-reported outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pruritus and presence of sleep disturbance. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated at each visit.
Results: Mean EASI score significantly decreased from 13.4 (95% CI 8.5-18.3) to 7.8 (95% CI 2.4-13.3) after 28 weeks (p = .002). Mean NRS pruritus significantly decreased from 6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.2) to 4.8 (95% CI 3.0-6.6) after 28 weeks (p = .003). At week 16, 75.0% (95% CI 46.8-91.1) achieved EASI ≤7, and 50.0% (95% CI 25.4-74.6) achieved NRS pruritus ≤4. Overall, 31 AEs were reported in 10 patients (66.7%). Five patients (33.3%) discontinued treatment: two due to ineffectiveness, two due to AEs, and one due to laboratory monitoring problems.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that upadacitinib is effective and relatively safe for adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD; however, 33.3% discontinued treatment.
目的:Upadacitinib被批准用于治疗年龄≥12岁的中重度特应性皮炎(AD)。我们在日常实践中评估了upadacitinib在AD青少年中的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:来自BioDay注册的15例青少年AD患者接受每日一次的upadacitinib 15mg治疗,分别在基线和4、8、16和28周后进行评估。采用湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分和研究者整体评估(IGA)评分评估疗效。患者报告的结果包括瘙痒的数值评定量表(NRS)和睡眠障碍的存在。在每次访问时评估不良事件(ae)。结果:28周后平均EASI评分从13.4 (95% CI 8.5-18.3)显著下降到7.8 (95% CI 2.4-13.3) (p = 0.002)。28周后,平均NRS瘙痒从6.5 (95% CI 4.9-8.2)显著降低到4.8 (95% CI 3.0-6.6) (p = 0.003)。第16周,75.0% (95% CI 46.8 ~ 91.1)患者的EASI≤7,50.0% (95% CI 25.4 ~ 74.6)患者的NRS瘙痒≤4。总体而言,10例患者报告了31例ae(66.7%)。5例患者(33.3%)停止治疗:2例因无效,2例因不良反应,1例因实验室监测问题。结论:我们的研究结果表明,upadacitinib对中重度AD青少年患者有效且相对安全;然而,33.3%的患者停止了治疗。