[Clinical disaster medicine: recommendations of the Surgical Working Group for Military and Emergency Surgery].

Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s00113-025-01610-w
Christian Beltzer, Wolfgang E Thasler, Jürgen Tepel, Arnulf Willms, Aliona Wöhler, Lena Heidelmann, Andreas Westerfeld, Christof Schreyer, Clemens Schafmayer, Sebastian Schaaf, Christoph Güsgen
{"title":"[Clinical disaster medicine: recommendations of the Surgical Working Group for Military and Emergency Surgery].","authors":"Christian Beltzer, Wolfgang E Thasler, Jürgen Tepel, Arnulf Willms, Aliona Wöhler, Lena Heidelmann, Andreas Westerfeld, Christof Schreyer, Clemens Schafmayer, Sebastian Schaaf, Christoph Güsgen","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01610-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In-hospital disaster medicine demands a structured, pragmatic and resource-efficient approach in the surgical treatment of patients under extreme conditions. The Surgical Working Group for Military and Emergency Surgery (CAMIN) of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) has developed guideline-based recommendations for making decisions, prioritization and management in disaster scenarios. The guidelines address the special challenges of atypical trauma patterns, as can be found in terrorist attacks or situations with mass casualties, such as gunshot or blast injuries. They highlight the use of damage control surgery (DCS), the differentiated application of laparotomy, open abdominal management and the triage of general and oncological procedures. The clinical assessment, focused diagnostics (e.g., extended focussed assessment with sonography in trauma, eFAST) and staged surgical algorithms are at the heart of this concept, aiming to ensure the highest level of patient safety and effectiveness despite critical resource limitations. The overriding principle is: \"do the most for the most.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"675-684"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01610-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In-hospital disaster medicine demands a structured, pragmatic and resource-efficient approach in the surgical treatment of patients under extreme conditions. The Surgical Working Group for Military and Emergency Surgery (CAMIN) of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery (DGAV) has developed guideline-based recommendations for making decisions, prioritization and management in disaster scenarios. The guidelines address the special challenges of atypical trauma patterns, as can be found in terrorist attacks or situations with mass casualties, such as gunshot or blast injuries. They highlight the use of damage control surgery (DCS), the differentiated application of laparotomy, open abdominal management and the triage of general and oncological procedures. The clinical assessment, focused diagnostics (e.g., extended focussed assessment with sonography in trauma, eFAST) and staged surgical algorithms are at the heart of this concept, aiming to ensure the highest level of patient safety and effectiveness despite critical resource limitations. The overriding principle is: "do the most for the most."

[临床灾害医学:军事和急诊外科手术工作组的建议]。
院内灾难医学要求在极端条件下对患者进行手术治疗时采用结构化、务实和资源高效的方法。德国普通和内脏外科学会(DGAV)的军事和急诊外科手术工作组(CAMIN)为灾害情景下的决策、优先排序和管理制定了基于指南的建议。该准则解决了非典型创伤模式的特殊挑战,例如在恐怖袭击或枪击或爆炸伤害等大规模伤亡情况下可能发现的非典型创伤模式。他们强调了损伤控制手术(DCS)的使用,剖腹手术的差异化应用,开腹治疗以及普通手术和肿瘤手术的分类。临床评估,重点诊断(例如,创伤超声扩展重点评估,eFAST)和分阶段手术算法是这一概念的核心,旨在确保在关键资源有限的情况下,最高水平的患者安全性和有效性。最重要的原则是:“为最多的人做最多的事。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信