How do host age and nutrition affect density regulation of obligate versus facultative bacterial symbionts? Insights from the tsetse fly.

IF 6.1 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2025-06-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycaf108
Mathilda Whittle, Antoine M G Barreaux, Lee R Haines, Michael B Bonsall, Sinead English, Fleur Ponton
{"title":"How do host age and nutrition affect density regulation of obligate versus facultative bacterial symbionts? Insights from the tsetse fly.","authors":"Mathilda Whittle, Antoine M G Barreaux, Lee R Haines, Michael B Bonsall, Sinead English, Fleur Ponton","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycaf108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Host-symbiont relationships can vary tremendously in the extent to which hosts depend on and control their symbionts. Obligate symbionts that provide micronutrients to their host are often compartmentalised to specialised host organs and depend on their hosts for survival, whereas facultative symbionts retain the ability to survive outside of their hosts. Few studies compare the extent to which a host controls and adjusts the density of obligate and facultative symbionts directly. We used tsetse as a model for teasing apart the relationships between a host (<i>Glossina morsitans morsitans</i>) and obligate (<i>Wigglesworthia glossinidia</i>) and facultative (<i>Sodalis glossinidius</i>) symbionts. We hypothesised that tsetse actively regulate the density of <i>Wigglesworthia</i> according to the host's requirements, depending on their current nutritional state and developmental age. In contrast, we postulated that <i>Sodalis</i> retains some independence from host control and that the growth of this symbiont is dependent on the conditions of the immediate environment, such as nutrient availability. Using qPCR, we examined how symbiont densities change across host age and the hunger cycle. Additionally, we investigated how host nutrition influences symbiont density, by comparing tsetse that were fed nutrient-poor or vitamin enriched diets. We found that the density of <i>Wigglesworthia</i> was not influenced by the nutritional status of the host but reflected long-term host nutritional needs. In contrast, the density of facultative <i>Sodalis</i> depended on the nutrient availability. We propose that tsetse tightly regulate <i>Wigglesworthia</i> but exert only partial control over <i>Sodalis</i> growth due to the relatively recent transition of this symbiont to host-associated living.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"5 1","pages":"ycaf108"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12309370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycaf108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Host-symbiont relationships can vary tremendously in the extent to which hosts depend on and control their symbionts. Obligate symbionts that provide micronutrients to their host are often compartmentalised to specialised host organs and depend on their hosts for survival, whereas facultative symbionts retain the ability to survive outside of their hosts. Few studies compare the extent to which a host controls and adjusts the density of obligate and facultative symbionts directly. We used tsetse as a model for teasing apart the relationships between a host (Glossina morsitans morsitans) and obligate (Wigglesworthia glossinidia) and facultative (Sodalis glossinidius) symbionts. We hypothesised that tsetse actively regulate the density of Wigglesworthia according to the host's requirements, depending on their current nutritional state and developmental age. In contrast, we postulated that Sodalis retains some independence from host control and that the growth of this symbiont is dependent on the conditions of the immediate environment, such as nutrient availability. Using qPCR, we examined how symbiont densities change across host age and the hunger cycle. Additionally, we investigated how host nutrition influences symbiont density, by comparing tsetse that were fed nutrient-poor or vitamin enriched diets. We found that the density of Wigglesworthia was not influenced by the nutritional status of the host but reflected long-term host nutritional needs. In contrast, the density of facultative Sodalis depended on the nutrient availability. We propose that tsetse tightly regulate Wigglesworthia but exert only partial control over Sodalis growth due to the relatively recent transition of this symbiont to host-associated living.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

宿主年龄和营养如何影响专性和兼性细菌共生体的密度调节?来自采采蝇的见解。
寄主-共生体关系在寄主依赖和控制其共生体的程度上可能有很大差异。专性共生体为其宿主提供微量营养素,通常被划分为专门的宿主器官,并依赖其宿主生存,而兼性共生体则保留在其宿主外生存的能力。很少有研究比较寄主直接控制和调节专性和兼性共生体密度的程度。我们使用采采蝇作为模型来梳理寄主(Glossina morsitans morsitans)与专性(Wigglesworthia glossary)和兼性(Sodalis glossary)共生体之间的关系。我们假设采采蝇根据宿主的需要,根据它们当前的营养状况和发育年龄,主动调节Wigglesworthia的密度。相反,我们假设Sodalis保留了一些不受宿主控制的独立性,并且这种共生体的生长依赖于直接环境的条件,例如养分的可用性。使用qPCR,我们研究了共生体密度如何在宿主年龄和饥饿周期中变化。此外,我们通过比较饲粮营养不足或维生素丰富的采采蝇,研究了宿主营养如何影响共生体密度。我们发现,Wigglesworthia的密度不受宿主营养状况的影响,而是反映了宿主长期的营养需求。与此相反,兼性小苏打的密度取决于养分的有效性。我们提出采采蝇严格调节Wigglesworthia,但对Sodalis的生长仅施加部分控制,因为这种共生体相对较近地过渡到与宿主相关的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信