Adult disability assessment in Türkiye with real-life experiences of physiatrists: A cross-sectional analytic study.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Hande Özdemir, Derya Demirbağ Kabayel, Meliha Kasapoğlu Aksoy, Erhan Arif Öztürk, Filiz Tuna, Sadiye Murat, İbrahim Gündoğdu, Sevil Okan, Nilgün Mesci, İlknur Aykurt Karlıbel, Filiz Acar Sivas, Hanife Çağlar Yağcı, Ali Sahillioğlu
{"title":"Adult disability assessment in Türkiye with real-life experiences of physiatrists: A cross-sectional analytic study.","authors":"Hande Özdemir, Derya Demirbağ Kabayel, Meliha Kasapoğlu Aksoy, Erhan Arif Öztürk, Filiz Tuna, Sadiye Murat, İbrahim Gündoğdu, Sevil Okan, Nilgün Mesci, İlknur Aykurt Karlıbel, Filiz Acar Sivas, Hanife Çağlar Yağcı, Ali Sahillioğlu","doi":"10.5606/tftrd.2025.14903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the workload and problems of physiatrists in disability assessment in Türkiye. <b>Materials and methods:</b> A 39-question electronic survey was administered between May 2023 and October 2023 to 217 physiatrists from all geographical regions of Türkiye. The survey was comprehensive in scope, encompassing a range of inquiries pertaining to demographic characteristics, time allocation for assessment, additional payment status, comprehensive training received, knowledge and skill levels, consistency of the national guideline used for disability assessment, attitudes toward decision-making, communication with other specialists, and medico-legal issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 217 physiatrists (86 males, 131 females; mean age: 41.5±8.0 years; range, 28 to 68 years), 155 (71.4%) specialists and 62 (28.6%) academics, with a mean residency experience of 11.99±8.31 years, participated in the study. The survey results showed that disability assessment was a heavy burden and a difficult task that may involve disadvantages for physiatrists, and a significant majority reported not having received comprehensive training in disability assessment during or after residency. Additionally, only 65% felt that their knowledge and skills in disability assessment were adequate. In addition, only 13.8% of physiatrists felt that the national guideline accurately reflected an individual's level of disability, with the results highlighting inadequacies and inconsistencies in the guideline. Another striking finding was that there was disagreement among clinicians regarding the rate of impairment and the determination of full dependency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiatrists, who play an important role in disability assessment, face several challenges in this process in Türkiye. The results of this study are expected to guide the implementation of effective and accurate disability assessment methods and provide sustainable solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56043,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"71 2","pages":"146-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12305682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2025.14903","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the workload and problems of physiatrists in disability assessment in Türkiye. Materials and methods: A 39-question electronic survey was administered between May 2023 and October 2023 to 217 physiatrists from all geographical regions of Türkiye. The survey was comprehensive in scope, encompassing a range of inquiries pertaining to demographic characteristics, time allocation for assessment, additional payment status, comprehensive training received, knowledge and skill levels, consistency of the national guideline used for disability assessment, attitudes toward decision-making, communication with other specialists, and medico-legal issues.

Results: A total of 217 physiatrists (86 males, 131 females; mean age: 41.5±8.0 years; range, 28 to 68 years), 155 (71.4%) specialists and 62 (28.6%) academics, with a mean residency experience of 11.99±8.31 years, participated in the study. The survey results showed that disability assessment was a heavy burden and a difficult task that may involve disadvantages for physiatrists, and a significant majority reported not having received comprehensive training in disability assessment during or after residency. Additionally, only 65% felt that their knowledge and skills in disability assessment were adequate. In addition, only 13.8% of physiatrists felt that the national guideline accurately reflected an individual's level of disability, with the results highlighting inadequacies and inconsistencies in the guideline. Another striking finding was that there was disagreement among clinicians regarding the rate of impairment and the determination of full dependency.

Conclusion: Physiatrists, who play an important role in disability assessment, face several challenges in this process in Türkiye. The results of this study are expected to guide the implementation of effective and accurate disability assessment methods and provide sustainable solutions.

成人残疾评估在 rkiye与现实生活经验的物理医生:横断面分析研究。
目的:本研究的目的是确定 rkiye伤残评估中物理医生的工作量和问题。材料和方法:在2023年5月至2023年10月期间,对来自 rkiye所有地理区域的217名物理医生进行了39个问题的电子调查。调查的范围是全面的,包括与人口特征、评估时间分配、额外支付状况、接受的综合培训、知识和技能水平、用于残疾评估的国家准则的一致性、对决策的态度、与其他专家的沟通以及医疗法律问题有关的一系列询问。结果:共217名物理医师(男86名,女131名;平均年龄:41.5±8.0岁;年龄在28 - 68岁之间),155名(71.4%)专家和62名(28.6%)学者参与了研究,平均住院经验为11.99±8.31年。调查结果显示,残疾评估是一项沉重的负担和困难的任务,可能涉及到不利的物理医师,绝大多数报告没有接受过全面的残疾评估培训在住院期间或之后。此外,只有65%的人认为他们在残疾评估方面的知识和技能是足够的。此外,只有13.8%的理疗师认为国家指南准确地反映了个人的残疾水平,结果突出了指南的不足和不一致之处。另一个惊人的发现是,临床医生对损伤率和完全依赖的确定存在分歧。结论:在残障评估中发挥重要作用的物理医师在残障评估过程中面临诸多挑战。本研究的结果有望指导有效、准确的残疾评估方法的实施,并提供可持续的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Formerly published as Türkiye Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi) is the official journal of the Turkish Society of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The journal is an international open-access, double-blind peer-reviewed periodical journal bringing the latest developments in all aspects of physical medicine and rehabilitation, and related fields. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, editorials, case reports (limited), letters to the editors. The target readership includes academic members, specialists, residents working in the fields of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. The language of the journal is English and it is published quarterly (in March, June, September, and December).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信