Inferior versus medial approach in laparoscopic and robotic surgery with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
S Izukawa, M Numata, T Harada, Y Atsumi, K Kazama, S Sawazaki, T Godai, H Mushiake, A Higuchi, H Tamagawa, Y Suwa, J Watanabe, T Sato, A Saito
{"title":"Inferior versus medial approach in laparoscopic and robotic surgery with complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"S Izukawa, M Numata, T Harada, Y Atsumi, K Kazama, S Sawazaki, T Godai, H Mushiake, A Higuchi, H Tamagawa, Y Suwa, J Watanabe, T Sato, A Saito","doi":"10.1007/s10151-025-03199-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right-sided colon cancer surgery is a highly difficult operation, and ensuring perioperative safety is an important issue. While various approaches have been proposed for right-sided colon cancer, there are few reports comparing them. The present study compared the inferior approach (IA) and medial approach (MA) for right-sided colon cancer surgery and evaluated their safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared 528 cases of right-sided colon cancer surgery performed at our five affiliated institutions from 2017 to 2023, divided into IA and MA groups of 122 cases each using propensity score matching. Short-term outcomes of both groups were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on perioperative complications and perioperative mortality as the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, all baseline variables were well balanced. All patients underwent complete mesocolic excision. No statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, and no cases of severe complications were observed in either group. The incidence rates of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (IA/ MA): anastomotic leakage (0%/ 0.8%); intraabdominal abscess (0.8%/ 1.6%); surgical site infection (0.8%/ 3.2%); ileus (0%/ 0.8%); and anastomotic bleeding: (0%/ 0%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group. Although there was a significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes, both groups had good R0 resection rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both IA and MA represent safe and feasible approaches for right-sided colon cancer and can be selected on the basis of the surgeon's preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12310748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-025-03199-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Right-sided colon cancer surgery is a highly difficult operation, and ensuring perioperative safety is an important issue. While various approaches have been proposed for right-sided colon cancer, there are few reports comparing them. The present study compared the inferior approach (IA) and medial approach (MA) for right-sided colon cancer surgery and evaluated their safety.

Methods: We compared 528 cases of right-sided colon cancer surgery performed at our five affiliated institutions from 2017 to 2023, divided into IA and MA groups of 122 cases each using propensity score matching. Short-term outcomes of both groups were retrospectively evaluated, focusing on perioperative complications and perioperative mortality as the primary outcomes.

Results: After propensity score matching, all baseline variables were well balanced. All patients underwent complete mesocolic excision. No statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, and no cases of severe complications were observed in either group. The incidence rates of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 3 complications (IA/ MA): anastomotic leakage (0%/ 0.8%); intraabdominal abscess (0.8%/ 1.6%); surgical site infection (0.8%/ 3.2%); ileus (0%/ 0.8%); and anastomotic bleeding: (0%/ 0%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the IA group. Although there was a significant difference in the number of dissected lymph nodes, both groups had good R0 resection rates.

Conclusions: Both IA and MA represent safe and feasible approaches for right-sided colon cancer and can be selected on the basis of the surgeon's preference.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

右侧结肠癌腹腔镜和机器人手术结肠系膜完全切除的下入路与内侧入路:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:右侧结肠癌手术是一项高难度的手术,确保围手术期的安全是一个重要问题。虽然已经提出了多种治疗右侧结肠癌的方法,但很少有比较它们的报道。本研究比较了右侧结肠癌手术的下入路(IA)和内侧入路(MA),并评价了它们的安全性。方法:对2017 - 2023年我院5家附属机构528例右侧结肠癌手术患者进行比较,采用倾向评分匹配法分为IA组和MA组,每组122例。回顾性评价两组患者的短期预后,以围手术期并发症和围手术期死亡率为主要预后指标。结果:倾向评分匹配后,所有基线变量平衡良好。所有患者均行完整肠系膜切除术。结论:IA和MA均为右侧结肠癌安全可行的入路,可根据术者喜好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信