Osimertinib Cost Minimization in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treatment: Hypothesis Generation for a Population Pharmacokinetic Approach for Equivalent Dose Optimization of Osimertinib in Combination With Cobicistat.

IF 2.3 4区 医学
Niels Westra, Paul D Kruithof, Sander Croes, Robin M J M van Geel, Lizza E L Hendriks, Daan J Touw, Jos G W Kosterink, Jasper Stevens, Thijs H Oude Munnink, Paola Mian
{"title":"Osimertinib Cost Minimization in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treatment: Hypothesis Generation for a Population Pharmacokinetic Approach for Equivalent Dose Optimization of Osimertinib in Combination With Cobicistat.","authors":"Niels Westra, Paul D Kruithof, Sander Croes, Robin M J M van Geel, Lizza E L Hendriks, Daan J Touw, Jos G W Kosterink, Jasper Stevens, Thijs H Oude Munnink, Paola Mian","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacokinetic boosting can be a strategy to enhance osimertinib exposure and reduce treatment associated costs. The OSIBOOST trial demonstrated that it was feasible to boost low osimertinib plasma trough levels with cobicistat. The current study aims to establish the equivalent dose of cobicistat boosted osimertinib compared to osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD) by population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling. A popPK model was developed on the pharmacokinetic data from the OSIBOOST study using NONMEM 7.4.4. Simulations were performed with cobicistat boosted osimertinib dosing regimens to evaluate their equivalence to the standard of osimertinib 80 mg QD. A dose level was assumed equivalent when the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) for the area under the curve over 144 h (AUC<sub>0-144h</sub>) and maximum osimertinib concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) were in the acceptance range of 0.8-1.25. Cobicistat decreased osimertinib CL/F by 29.6% compared to osimertinib monotherapy (p < .0001). Osimertinib 80 mg 2 days on, 1 day off, boosted with cobicistat 150 mg QD was equivalent for osimertinib AUC<sub>0-144h</sub> (GMR [90% CI] = 0.96 [0.94-0.98]) and C<sub>max</sub> (GMR [90% CI] = 1.06 [1.04-1.08]) compared to osimertinib 80 mg QD monotherapy. However, this regimen was not equivalent for AZ5104 AUC<sub>0-144h</sub> (GMR [90% CI] = 0.67 [0.66-0.68]) and C<sub>max</sub> (GMR [90% CI] = 0.74 [0.73-0.76]). Theoretically, this reduced dose of cobicistat boosted osimertinib can potentially save approximately 33% in osimertinib treatment associated costs whilst maintaining adequate osimertinib exposure. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03858491.</p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.70085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic boosting can be a strategy to enhance osimertinib exposure and reduce treatment associated costs. The OSIBOOST trial demonstrated that it was feasible to boost low osimertinib plasma trough levels with cobicistat. The current study aims to establish the equivalent dose of cobicistat boosted osimertinib compared to osimertinib 80 mg once daily (QD) by population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modeling. A popPK model was developed on the pharmacokinetic data from the OSIBOOST study using NONMEM 7.4.4. Simulations were performed with cobicistat boosted osimertinib dosing regimens to evaluate their equivalence to the standard of osimertinib 80 mg QD. A dose level was assumed equivalent when the 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios (GMR) for the area under the curve over 144 h (AUC0-144h) and maximum osimertinib concentration (Cmax) were in the acceptance range of 0.8-1.25. Cobicistat decreased osimertinib CL/F by 29.6% compared to osimertinib monotherapy (p < .0001). Osimertinib 80 mg 2 days on, 1 day off, boosted with cobicistat 150 mg QD was equivalent for osimertinib AUC0-144h (GMR [90% CI] = 0.96 [0.94-0.98]) and Cmax (GMR [90% CI] = 1.06 [1.04-1.08]) compared to osimertinib 80 mg QD monotherapy. However, this regimen was not equivalent for AZ5104 AUC0-144h (GMR [90% CI] = 0.67 [0.66-0.68]) and Cmax (GMR [90% CI] = 0.74 [0.73-0.76]). Theoretically, this reduced dose of cobicistat boosted osimertinib can potentially save approximately 33% in osimertinib treatment associated costs whilst maintaining adequate osimertinib exposure. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03858491.

奥西替尼在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗中的成本最小化:奥西替尼与Cobicistat联合等效剂量优化的群体药代动力学方法的假设生成。
促进药代动力学可以是一种策略,以增加奥西替尼暴露和减少治疗相关费用。OSIBOOST试验表明,使用cobicistat提高低奥西替尼血浆低谷水平是可行的。目前的研究旨在通过群体药代动力学(popPK)模型建立cobicistat增强的奥希替尼与80mg每日一次(QD)的奥希替尼的等效剂量。利用NONMEM 7.4.4软件对OSIBOOST研究的药代动力学数据建立popPK模型。用cobicistat增加的奥西替尼给药方案进行模拟,以评估其与奥西替尼80mg QD标准的等效性。当144h (AUC0-144h)内曲线下面积的几何平均比(GMR)的90%置信区间(CI)和最大奥西替尼浓度(Cmax)在0.8-1.25的可接受范围内时,认为剂量水平是等效的。与奥希替尼80mg QD单药治疗相比,Cobicistat使奥希替尼CL/F降低29.6% (p 0 ~ 144h (GMR [90% CI] = 0.96[0.94 ~ 0.98])和Cmax (GMR [90% CI] = 1.06[1.04 ~ 1.08])。然而,该方案对AZ5104 AUC0-144h (GMR [90% CI] = 0.67[0.66-0.68])和Cmax (GMR [90% CI] = 0.74[0.73-0.76])并不等效。从理论上讲,降低可比司他的剂量增加了奥希替尼,可以在保持足够的奥希替尼暴露的同时,潜在地节省约33%的奥希替尼治疗相关费用。临床试验注册:NCT03858491。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Journal of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信