Efficacy and social validity of intervention using speech generating device and tactile symbols to develop communication and language in a child with visual impairment and additional disability.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Vineetha Sara Philip, Suryasree P K, Kripa Elizebath Santhosh
{"title":"Efficacy and social validity of intervention using speech generating device and tactile symbols to develop communication and language in a child with visual impairment and additional disability.","authors":"Vineetha Sara Philip, Suryasree P K, Kripa Elizebath Santhosh","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2539436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visual impairment (VI) can significantly hinder language development in children. While VI alone may not drastically alter the trajectory of language acquisition, the presence of additional disabilities can pose significant challenges. Despite these difficulties, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, such as speech-generating devices (SGDs) and tactile symbols, have shown promise in supporting communication and language development in such children. This study investigated the efficacy of a targeted AAC intervention utilizing an SGD and individualized tactile symbols to enhance communication functions, receptive and expressive language skills in a non-verbal child with VI and additional disabilities. Additionally, the study explored the caregiver's satisfaction with the intervention. A longitudinal case study method was employed to meet the study purpose. A baseline assessment of communication and language skills was done prior to intervention. Intervention using SGD and tactile symbols were carried out in three phases and outcomes were measured once during the intervention phase and once again after providing intervention. The intervention, conducted over 40 sessions, yielded positive results, demonstrating a significant impact on the child's communication and language development. Notably, the child also developed meaningful speech during the intervention period. The primary caregiver rated the outcomes of the intervention as highly beneficial to the child. The study concludes that a well-structured intervention, incorporating both technological and tactile modalities, can substantially enhance the speech, language, and communication skills of children with VI and additional disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2557-2572"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2539436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visual impairment (VI) can significantly hinder language development in children. While VI alone may not drastically alter the trajectory of language acquisition, the presence of additional disabilities can pose significant challenges. Despite these difficulties, augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, such as speech-generating devices (SGDs) and tactile symbols, have shown promise in supporting communication and language development in such children. This study investigated the efficacy of a targeted AAC intervention utilizing an SGD and individualized tactile symbols to enhance communication functions, receptive and expressive language skills in a non-verbal child with VI and additional disabilities. Additionally, the study explored the caregiver's satisfaction with the intervention. A longitudinal case study method was employed to meet the study purpose. A baseline assessment of communication and language skills was done prior to intervention. Intervention using SGD and tactile symbols were carried out in three phases and outcomes were measured once during the intervention phase and once again after providing intervention. The intervention, conducted over 40 sessions, yielded positive results, demonstrating a significant impact on the child's communication and language development. Notably, the child also developed meaningful speech during the intervention period. The primary caregiver rated the outcomes of the intervention as highly beneficial to the child. The study concludes that a well-structured intervention, incorporating both technological and tactile modalities, can substantially enhance the speech, language, and communication skills of children with VI and additional disabilities.

使用语言产生装置和触觉符号干预视觉障碍和其他残疾儿童交流和语言发展的有效性和社会效度。
视觉障碍(VI)会严重阻碍儿童的语言发展。虽然VI本身可能不会彻底改变语言习得的轨迹,但其他残疾的存在可能会带来重大挑战。尽管存在这些困难,辅助和替代沟通(AAC)策略,如语音生成设备(SGDs)和触觉符号,在支持这些儿童的沟通和语言发展方面显示出了希望。本研究探讨了利用SGD和个性化触觉符号进行针对性的AAC干预的有效性,以增强患有VI和其他残疾的非语言儿童的沟通功能、接受和表达语言技能。此外,研究还探讨了照顾者对干预的满意度。为达到研究目的,本研究采用纵向个案研究方法。在干预前进行了沟通和语言技能的基线评估。使用SGD和触觉符号的干预分三个阶段进行,在干预阶段和提供干预后分别测量一次结果。这项干预进行了40多次,取得了积极的成果,对儿童的沟通和语言发展产生了重大影响。值得注意的是,在干预期间,孩子也发展了有意义的语言。主要照顾者评价干预的结果对孩子非常有益。该研究的结论是,一个结构良好的干预,结合技术和触觉的方式,可以大大提高六六级和其他残疾儿童的言语、语言和沟通技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信