{"title":"Clinical review of laryngomalacia in a tertiary hospital.","authors":"L Ghazali, S S A Hamid, H Mohamad, A Aziz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laryngomalacia is the most common cause of stridor in infants, with severity ranging from mild to severe forms. Accurate classifications of severity is essential for guiding management and improving outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of paediatric patients under two years of age diagnosed with laryngomalacia at a tertiary referral centre between January 2010 and December 2020. Data collected included demographic details, clinical presentation, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, treatment, and follow-up duration. Severity was classified using a symptoms-based scoring system by Shah et al, while laryngomalacia types were determined according to Olney et al's endoscopic classification. Association between severity, endoscopic findings, comorbidities and treatment choice were analysed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 patients were included (59.49% male). Mild, moderate, and severe laryngomalacia were observed in 45.27%, 35.14%, and 19.59% of patients, respectively. Type 3 laryngomalacia, identified via endoscopy, was significantly associated with severe disease (p<0.001). Comorbidities, particularly gastroesophageal reflux disease, cardiac, pulmonary, syndromic, neurological conditions and synchronous airway lesions, were significantly linked to higher severity (p<0.05). A strong association was found between severity and treatment: moderate cases had 89.6 times, and severe cases 133.3 times, the odds of receiving surgical intervention compared to mild cases (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mild laryngomalacia was most prevalent, but severity increased with specific comorbidities and endoscopic findings. Objective symptom scoring and endoscopic classification are valuable for assessing severity and guiding appropriate management in laryngomalacia.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":"80 4","pages":"443-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Laryngomalacia is the most common cause of stridor in infants, with severity ranging from mild to severe forms. Accurate classifications of severity is essential for guiding management and improving outcomes.
Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study of paediatric patients under two years of age diagnosed with laryngomalacia at a tertiary referral centre between January 2010 and December 2020. Data collected included demographic details, clinical presentation, comorbidities, endoscopic findings, treatment, and follow-up duration. Severity was classified using a symptoms-based scoring system by Shah et al, while laryngomalacia types were determined according to Olney et al's endoscopic classification. Association between severity, endoscopic findings, comorbidities and treatment choice were analysed using logistic regression.
Results: A total of 148 patients were included (59.49% male). Mild, moderate, and severe laryngomalacia were observed in 45.27%, 35.14%, and 19.59% of patients, respectively. Type 3 laryngomalacia, identified via endoscopy, was significantly associated with severe disease (p<0.001). Comorbidities, particularly gastroesophageal reflux disease, cardiac, pulmonary, syndromic, neurological conditions and synchronous airway lesions, were significantly linked to higher severity (p<0.05). A strong association was found between severity and treatment: moderate cases had 89.6 times, and severe cases 133.3 times, the odds of receiving surgical intervention compared to mild cases (p<0.001).
Conclusion: Mild laryngomalacia was most prevalent, but severity increased with specific comorbidities and endoscopic findings. Objective symptom scoring and endoscopic classification are valuable for assessing severity and guiding appropriate management in laryngomalacia.
期刊介绍:
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.