Provision of follow-up services for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: A UK national survey.

IF 1.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2025-07-28 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/17511437251334354
Jin-Xi Yuan, Constance E D Osborne, Ibrahim Almafreji, Bronwen Connolly, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Brian W Johnston, Karen Williams, Christina Jones, Peter Fisher, Ingeborg D Welters, Alicia Ac Waite
{"title":"Provision of follow-up services for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness: A UK national survey.","authors":"Jin-Xi Yuan, Constance E D Osborne, Ibrahim Almafreji, Bronwen Connolly, Andrew J Boyle, Mary Gemma Cherry, Brian W Johnston, Karen Williams, Christina Jones, Peter Fisher, Ingeborg D Welters, Alicia Ac Waite","doi":"10.1177/17511437251334354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) can receive support from ICU follow-up services in their process of recovery and rehabilitation. However, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the ability of UK hospitals to provide follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the provision of follow-up services in the UK for adult survivors of COVID-19 critical illness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult National Health Service (NHS) ICUs in the UK were invited to participate. Intensive care clinicians aware of follow-up services offered at their site were invited to complete a self-administered online electronic survey. Free text answers were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>174 of 242 (71.9%) NHS hospitals responded to the survey. 140 (80.5%) of the respondent hospitals had an ICU follow-up service for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness. A new service was created at 28 (16.1%) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. ICU follow-up services were mostly delivered by nurses (125/140, 89.3%), ICU doctors (111/140, 79.3%), physiotherapists (88/140, 62.9%) and psychologists (59/140, 42.1%). Where ICU follow-up services already existed, changes were made in 111 (79.3%) hospitals during the pandemic and these were maintained in 89 (80.2%) hospitals. Funding was a commonly reported reason for whether follow-up services were offered.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was an expansion in the number of ICU follow-up clinics, and the multidisciplinary team delivering post-ICU care to patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness. Many changes to clinic operations introduced during the pandemic persisted, including the use of virtual and hybrid follow-up clinic models.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"343-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12303922/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437251334354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) survivors in the United Kingdom (UK) can receive support from ICU follow-up services in their process of recovery and rehabilitation. However, it is unclear whether the COVID-19 pandemic impacted the ability of UK hospitals to provide follow-up. The objective of this study was to evaluate the provision of follow-up services in the UK for adult survivors of COVID-19 critical illness.

Methods: All adult National Health Service (NHS) ICUs in the UK were invited to participate. Intensive care clinicians aware of follow-up services offered at their site were invited to complete a self-administered online electronic survey. Free text answers were thematically analysed.

Results: 174 of 242 (71.9%) NHS hospitals responded to the survey. 140 (80.5%) of the respondent hospitals had an ICU follow-up service for survivors of COVID-19 critical illness. A new service was created at 28 (16.1%) hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. ICU follow-up services were mostly delivered by nurses (125/140, 89.3%), ICU doctors (111/140, 79.3%), physiotherapists (88/140, 62.9%) and psychologists (59/140, 42.1%). Where ICU follow-up services already existed, changes were made in 111 (79.3%) hospitals during the pandemic and these were maintained in 89 (80.2%) hospitals. Funding was a commonly reported reason for whether follow-up services were offered.

Conclusions: There was an expansion in the number of ICU follow-up clinics, and the multidisciplinary team delivering post-ICU care to patients who survived COVID-19 critical illness. Many changes to clinic operations introduced during the pandemic persisted, including the use of virtual and hybrid follow-up clinic models.

为COVID-19危重疾病幸存者提供后续服务:一项英国全国调查。
背景:重症监护病房(ICU)幸存者在英国(UK)的恢复和康复过程中可以得到ICU随访服务的支持。然而,目前尚不清楚COVID-19大流行是否影响了英国医院提供随访的能力。本研究的目的是评估英国为COVID-19危重疾病成年幸存者提供的后续服务。方法:邀请英国所有成人国民健康服务(NHS) icu参与。了解在其网站提供的后续服务的重症监护临床医生被邀请完成一项自我管理的在线电子调查。对自由文本答案进行主题分析。结果:242家NHS医院中有174家(71.9%)回应了调查。140家(80.5%)受访医院为COVID-19危重症幸存者提供ICU随访服务。在COVID-19大流行期间,28家(16.1%)医院创建了新服务。ICU随访服务主要由护士(125/140,89.3%)、ICU医生(111/140,79.3%)、物理治疗师(88/140,62.9%)和心理医生(59/140,42.1%)提供。在已经存在ICU随访服务的地方,111家(79.3%)医院在大流行期间进行了改变,89家(80.2%)医院维持了这些服务。经费是是否提供后续服务的一个普遍报告的原因。结论:ICU随访诊所数量增加,多学科团队为COVID-19危重症存活患者提供ICU后护理。大流行期间引入的诊所业务的许多变化仍在继续,包括使用虚拟和混合后续诊所模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信