Understanding collaborative working between GPs and community pharmacists - systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

IF 2 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-07-30 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0203
Grace Kng Li Lin, Aleema Sardar, David N Blane
{"title":"Understanding collaborative working between GPs and community pharmacists - systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.","authors":"Grace Kng Li Lin, Aleema Sardar, David N Blane","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Collaborative working between General practitioners (GPs) and Community Pharmacists (CPs) has led to improvements in management of long-term conditions, and has strong policy backing, yet such joint working remains patchy and under-developed. Understanding the perspectives of GPs and CPs regarding collaboration provides insights for more sustainable collaborative practices.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand the perspectives of GPs and community pharmacists concerning collaborative care practices, and to develop a framework of factors that influence this collaborative working relationship.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative studies.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five databases were searched from inception to the 22<sup>nd</sup> of April 2023 for qualitative studies exploring GP and CP views on collaborative care services. Articles were independently screened by two reviewers at title, abstract and full-text levels. Data extracted from eligible studies were analysed and synthesised thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Four main themes were identified: 1) How pre-existing relationships influence mutual understanding of roles, 2) the impact of location and communication on relationship building, 3) analysis of perceived costs and benefits, and 4) the motivation to develop collaborative care practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A complex interplay of factors influences GP and CP collaborative working, including pre-existing relationships, communication and mutual understanding, and the balance of costs and benefits to further develop these relationships. When planning future collaborative care practices, stakeholders must take the time and initiative to elucidate and understand these factors within their own unique healthcare setting to form lasting working relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Collaborative working between General practitioners (GPs) and Community Pharmacists (CPs) has led to improvements in management of long-term conditions, and has strong policy backing, yet such joint working remains patchy and under-developed. Understanding the perspectives of GPs and CPs regarding collaboration provides insights for more sustainable collaborative practices.

Aim: To understand the perspectives of GPs and community pharmacists concerning collaborative care practices, and to develop a framework of factors that influence this collaborative working relationship.

Design & setting: A systematic review of qualitative studies.

Method: Five databases were searched from inception to the 22nd of April 2023 for qualitative studies exploring GP and CP views on collaborative care services. Articles were independently screened by two reviewers at title, abstract and full-text levels. Data extracted from eligible studies were analysed and synthesised thematically.

Results: Thirty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. Four main themes were identified: 1) How pre-existing relationships influence mutual understanding of roles, 2) the impact of location and communication on relationship building, 3) analysis of perceived costs and benefits, and 4) the motivation to develop collaborative care practices.

Conclusion: A complex interplay of factors influences GP and CP collaborative working, including pre-existing relationships, communication and mutual understanding, and the balance of costs and benefits to further develop these relationships. When planning future collaborative care practices, stakeholders must take the time and initiative to elucidate and understand these factors within their own unique healthcare setting to form lasting working relationships.

了解全科医生和社区药剂师之间的合作工作-定性研究的系统回顾和专题综合。
背景:全科医生(gp)和社区药剂师(CPs)之间的合作工作已经导致了长期条件管理的改善,并有强有力的政策支持,但这种联合工作仍然不完整和不发达。了解全科医生和CPs关于协作的观点可以为更可持续的协作实践提供见解。目的:了解全科医生和社区药剂师对合作护理实践的看法,并制定影响这种合作工作关系的因素框架。设计与设置:对定性研究的系统回顾。方法:检索自成立至2023年4月22日的5个数据库进行定性研究,探讨全科医生和CP对协同护理服务的看法。文章由两位审稿人在标题、摘要和全文三个层面进行独立筛选。从符合条件的研究中提取的数据按主题进行分析和综合。结果:36项研究符合纳入标准。研究确定了四个主要主题:1)既存关系如何影响相互角色的理解;2)地理位置和沟通对关系建立的影响;3)感知成本和收益分析;4)发展协作护理实践的动机。结论:影响全科医生和初级医师协同工作的因素是复杂的,包括既存关系、沟通和相互理解,以及进一步发展这些关系的成本和收益平衡。在规划未来的协作护理实践时,利益相关者必须花时间和主动地在自己独特的医疗保健环境中阐明和理解这些因素,以形成持久的工作关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信