Linkages between socioeconomic inequalities, pro-environmental behaviours, climate change concerns and experiences, and wellbeing outcomes in England.

IF 2.5 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2025.2500182
Jonathan R Olsen, Claire L Niedzwiedz, Ruth Dundas, Jala Rizeq, Gergő Baranyi, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Jill Pell
{"title":"Linkages between socioeconomic inequalities, pro-environmental behaviours, climate change concerns and experiences, and wellbeing outcomes in England.","authors":"Jonathan R Olsen, Claire L Niedzwiedz, Ruth Dundas, Jala Rizeq, Gergő Baranyi, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Jill Pell","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2025.2500182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global health community recognises climate change as a public health emergency due to its direct and indirect impacts on health and wellbeing. This study explores sociodemographic differences in climate change concern and pro-environmental behaviours by socioeconomic status, their association with wellbeing, and whether experiences of climate change (e.g. residing in flood-affected or temperature-changing areas) mediate wellbeing outcomes. Using data from Understanding Society, a national panel survey in England (2018/19, <i>n</i> = 24,950, age 16+), the study examined climate concern, 11 pro-environmental behaviours, satisfaction with these behaviours, and three wellbeing outcomes: life satisfaction, optimism, and psychological distress. Data were spatially linked with flood (2010-18) and summer temperature changes (2001-2020). Climate concern varied by sociodemographic factors, with older and disadvantaged groups most satisfied with their behaviours. Individuals satisfied with their environmental actions reported better wellbeing, while dissatisfaction was linked to distress and worse life satisfaction. However, pro-environmental behaviours themselves were not associated with wellbeing. Residing in flood-affected or temperature-changing areas also showed no link to wellbeing. Addressing wellbeing impacts related to climate concern requires targeted mitigation strategies, especially for those dissatisfied with their environmental actions. Pro-environmental behaviours could act to mitigate against the potential adverse effects of eco-anxiety.</p>","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"11 1","pages":"2500182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12306679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2025.2500182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global health community recognises climate change as a public health emergency due to its direct and indirect impacts on health and wellbeing. This study explores sociodemographic differences in climate change concern and pro-environmental behaviours by socioeconomic status, their association with wellbeing, and whether experiences of climate change (e.g. residing in flood-affected or temperature-changing areas) mediate wellbeing outcomes. Using data from Understanding Society, a national panel survey in England (2018/19, n = 24,950, age 16+), the study examined climate concern, 11 pro-environmental behaviours, satisfaction with these behaviours, and three wellbeing outcomes: life satisfaction, optimism, and psychological distress. Data were spatially linked with flood (2010-18) and summer temperature changes (2001-2020). Climate concern varied by sociodemographic factors, with older and disadvantaged groups most satisfied with their behaviours. Individuals satisfied with their environmental actions reported better wellbeing, while dissatisfaction was linked to distress and worse life satisfaction. However, pro-environmental behaviours themselves were not associated with wellbeing. Residing in flood-affected or temperature-changing areas also showed no link to wellbeing. Addressing wellbeing impacts related to climate concern requires targeted mitigation strategies, especially for those dissatisfied with their environmental actions. Pro-environmental behaviours could act to mitigate against the potential adverse effects of eco-anxiety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英国社会经济不平等、亲环境行为、气候变化关注和经历与福祉结果之间的联系。
由于气候变化对健康和福祉的直接和间接影响,全球卫生界认识到气候变化是突发公共卫生事件。本研究探讨了社会经济地位对气候变化关注和亲环境行为的社会人口差异,以及它们与幸福感的关系,以及气候变化的经历(例如居住在受洪水影响或温度变化的地区)是否会调节幸福感结果。该研究使用了英国全国小组调查“理解社会”(Understanding Society)的数据(2018/19,n = 24,950,年龄16岁以上),研究了气候问题、11种亲环境行为、对这些行为的满意度以及三种健康结果:生活满意度、乐观主义和心理困扰。数据与洪水(2010-18年)和夏季气温变化(2001-2020年)具有空间联系。气候关注因社会人口因素而异,老年人和弱势群体对自己的行为最满意。对自己的环保行动感到满意的人幸福感更高,而不满意的人则与痛苦和更低的生活满意度有关。然而,亲环境行为本身与幸福感无关。居住在受洪水影响或气温变化的地区也与幸福感没有联系。解决与气候问题有关的福祉影响需要有针对性的缓解战略,特别是针对那些对自己的环境行动不满意的人。亲环境行为可以减轻生态焦虑的潜在不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信