Radiographic Anatomy and Clinical Value of the Modified Corner Approach in Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1111/os.70143
Sizheng Zhan, Haoning Ma, Yuming Wang, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang
{"title":"Radiographic Anatomy and Clinical Value of the Modified Corner Approach in Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy.","authors":"Sizheng Zhan, Haoning Ma, Yuming Wang, Ping Yi, Xiangsheng Tang","doi":"10.1111/os.70143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The first step of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is puncture localization, which lacks standardized protocols and requires a significant learning curve. To address this, we developed a modified corner approach targeting the junction of the S1 superior endplate and facet joint. This study aims to characterize the radiographic anatomy and assess the clinical utility of this modified approach.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 100 patients were analyzed to measure distances between the target and adjacent structures (dura sac, pedicle, L5 nerve, and S1 nerve). The learning curve of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) surgery based on the modified corner approach was determined by prospectively collecting data from 80 patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean distance between the target and the dura sac was 4.59 ± 1.74 mm. The mean distance between the target and the inferior border of the L5 nerve was 10.14 ± 1.72 mm, rang from 7.52 to 13.54 mm. The mean distance between the target and the outer edge of the S1 nerve was 0.51 ± 0.91 mm, rang from -0.12 to 2 mm. The mean distance between the target and the inner edge of the S1 pedicle was 3.77 ± 1.04 mm. The distance between the target and the dura sac and the inner edge of the pedicle is mainly affected by the patient's age.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The modified corner approach is a simple, safe, and repeatable surgical approach with the intersection of the superior endplate and facet joint as the puncture target. For patients without or with mild facet joint degeneration, the puncture target can be appropriately moved inward by 2 mm.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2640-2646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12404854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The first step of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) is puncture localization, which lacks standardized protocols and requires a significant learning curve. To address this, we developed a modified corner approach targeting the junction of the S1 superior endplate and facet joint. This study aims to characterize the radiographic anatomy and assess the clinical utility of this modified approach.

Method: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from 100 patients were analyzed to measure distances between the target and adjacent structures (dura sac, pedicle, L5 nerve, and S1 nerve). The learning curve of interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) surgery based on the modified corner approach was determined by prospectively collecting data from 80 patients.

Results: The mean distance between the target and the dura sac was 4.59 ± 1.74 mm. The mean distance between the target and the inferior border of the L5 nerve was 10.14 ± 1.72 mm, rang from 7.52 to 13.54 mm. The mean distance between the target and the outer edge of the S1 nerve was 0.51 ± 0.91 mm, rang from -0.12 to 2 mm. The mean distance between the target and the inner edge of the S1 pedicle was 3.77 ± 1.04 mm. The distance between the target and the dura sac and the inner edge of the pedicle is mainly affected by the patient's age.

Conclusion: The modified corner approach is a simple, safe, and repeatable surgical approach with the intersection of the superior endplate and facet joint as the puncture target. For patients without or with mild facet joint degeneration, the puncture target can be appropriately moved inward by 2 mm.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

改良角入路在椎板间内镜下腰椎间盘切除术中的影像学解剖及临床价值。
目的:椎板间内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(field)的第一步是穿刺定位,缺乏标准化的方案,需要大量的学习曲线。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一种针对S1上终板和小关节连接处的改良角入路。本研究旨在描述放射学解剖特征,并评估这种改良入路的临床应用。方法:分析100例患者的CT和MRI资料,测量靶与邻近结构(硬脑膜囊、椎弓根、L5神经和S1神经)之间的距离。通过前瞻性收集80例患者的数据,确定了基于改良角入路的椎板间内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(field)手术的学习曲线。结果:靶与硬脑膜囊的平均距离为4.59±1.74 mm。靶距L5神经下缘的平均距离为10.14±1.72 mm,范围为7.52 ~ 13.54 mm。靶距S1神经外缘平均距离为0.51±0.91 mm,范围为-0.12 ~ 2mm。靶距S1蒂内缘的平均距离为3.77±1.04 mm。靶距硬脑膜囊及蒂内缘的距离主要受患者年龄的影响。结论:改良角入路是一种简单、安全、可重复的手术入路,以上终板与小关节的交叉点为穿刺靶点。对于没有或有轻微小关节退变的患者,穿刺靶可适当向内移动2mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信